Understanding of Islamic Studies Through Textual and Contextual Approaches

Farabi Pub Date : 2020-06-03 DOI:10.30603/jf.v17i1.1281
Hendri Hermawan Adinugraha, A. H. A. Ulama’i
{"title":"Understanding of Islamic Studies Through Textual and Contextual Approaches","authors":"Hendri Hermawan Adinugraha, A. H. A. Ulama’i","doi":"10.30603/jf.v17i1.1281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to describe Islamic studies through two approaches both are textual and contextual approaches. The method used in this study was a literature research approach. The results of literature research was shown that at current time a religion is always used as the foundation of humanity to answer the complexity of their problems, the Qur’an is always used as the theological and praxis foundation for Muslims in answering it. The form of the Qur’an as a normative text gives rise to multiple interpretations from people who are readers, this results in the emergence of textualist and contextual groups in the scientific domain of Islamic studies. Textualist schools try to purify the practice of the Qur’an through the insider meanings and meanings of the Qur’an itself without involving understanding or reasoning with reality, whereas contextualist schools of thought seek to dialogue the Qur’anic texts with dynamic social realities. Whereas a comprehensive interpretation should be carried out by using two approaches simultaneously in order to produce actual and factual Islamic studies and to make the content of the Qur’an truly relevant to facts or phenomena that are happening anytime and anywhere.","PeriodicalId":31331,"journal":{"name":"Farabi","volume":"87 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Farabi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30603/jf.v17i1.1281","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to describe Islamic studies through two approaches both are textual and contextual approaches. The method used in this study was a literature research approach. The results of literature research was shown that at current time a religion is always used as the foundation of humanity to answer the complexity of their problems, the Qur’an is always used as the theological and praxis foundation for Muslims in answering it. The form of the Qur’an as a normative text gives rise to multiple interpretations from people who are readers, this results in the emergence of textualist and contextual groups in the scientific domain of Islamic studies. Textualist schools try to purify the practice of the Qur’an through the insider meanings and meanings of the Qur’an itself without involving understanding or reasoning with reality, whereas contextualist schools of thought seek to dialogue the Qur’anic texts with dynamic social realities. Whereas a comprehensive interpretation should be carried out by using two approaches simultaneously in order to produce actual and factual Islamic studies and to make the content of the Qur’an truly relevant to facts or phenomena that are happening anytime and anywhere.
通过文本和上下文方法理解伊斯兰研究
本研究的目的是通过两种方法来描述伊斯兰研究,这两种方法都是文本方法和上下文方法。本研究采用文献研究法。文献研究的结果表明,在当今时代,宗教总是被用作人类回答其复杂问题的基础,古兰经总是被用作穆斯林回答这些问题的神学和实践基础。《古兰经》作为一种规范文本的形式引起了读者的多种解释,这导致了伊斯兰研究科学领域中文本主义者和上下文群体的出现。文本主义学派试图通过《古兰经》本身的内在意义和意义来净化《古兰经》的实践,而不涉及对现实的理解或推理,而情境主义学派则试图将《古兰经》文本与动态的社会现实对话。然而,全面的解释应该同时使用两种方法来进行,以便产生实际的和事实性的伊斯兰研究,并使古兰经的内容真正与随时随地发生的事实或现象相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信