Efficacy of kinesio taping versus extracorporeal shock wave therapy in the short term for the calcaneal spur

Q3 Medicine
Nurten NAS KIRDAR, Tuba Kanyılmaz
{"title":"Efficacy of kinesio taping versus extracorporeal shock wave therapy in the short term for the calcaneal spur","authors":"Nurten NAS KIRDAR, Tuba Kanyılmaz","doi":"10.52142/omujecm.40.1.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The calcaneal spur is a common cause of heel pain, and there are various approaches to its treatment. Our aim in this study is to investigate the effectiveness of kinesio taping against Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy (ESWT) in the treatment of calcaneal spur. This study was designed as a randomized controlled, prospective and single-center clinical trial. A total of 93 patients with calcaneal spur (18 men, 75 women) were included. Patients were divided into two groups (based on gender, age, BMI, and pain duration) by stratified randomization (kinesio tape group=46, ESWT group=47 patients). 3 sessions of ESWT were applied to the heels of the patients in the 1st group with an interval of 1 week. Kinesio taping was applied to the 2nd group. It was applied once a week, for 3 weeks. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Foot Function Index (FFI) scores of the patients in both groups before the treatment and 1 week after the end of the treatment were recorded. When we evaluated the pre-treatment and post-treatment parameters, we found a significant decrease in VAS, FFI-pain, FFI-disability and FFI-activity restriction scores in both groups (p=0.0001). We also found that kinesio taping was more effective than ESWT in reducing FFI-pain (for after treatment FFI-pain inter group p=0.005, for FFI-pain difference inter group p=0.002) and FFI-disability (for after treatment FFI-disability inter group p=0.023, for FFI-disability difference inter group p=0.0001) scores. To conclude, although both kinesio taping and ESWT treatments reduced patients' pain, disability and activity limitation, kinesio taping was found to be more effective in reducing pain and disability. Studies with longer follow-up are needed to clarify our results.","PeriodicalId":38819,"journal":{"name":"Tokai Journal of Experimental and Clinical Medicine","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tokai Journal of Experimental and Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52142/omujecm.40.1.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The calcaneal spur is a common cause of heel pain, and there are various approaches to its treatment. Our aim in this study is to investigate the effectiveness of kinesio taping against Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy (ESWT) in the treatment of calcaneal spur. This study was designed as a randomized controlled, prospective and single-center clinical trial. A total of 93 patients with calcaneal spur (18 men, 75 women) were included. Patients were divided into two groups (based on gender, age, BMI, and pain duration) by stratified randomization (kinesio tape group=46, ESWT group=47 patients). 3 sessions of ESWT were applied to the heels of the patients in the 1st group with an interval of 1 week. Kinesio taping was applied to the 2nd group. It was applied once a week, for 3 weeks. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Foot Function Index (FFI) scores of the patients in both groups before the treatment and 1 week after the end of the treatment were recorded. When we evaluated the pre-treatment and post-treatment parameters, we found a significant decrease in VAS, FFI-pain, FFI-disability and FFI-activity restriction scores in both groups (p=0.0001). We also found that kinesio taping was more effective than ESWT in reducing FFI-pain (for after treatment FFI-pain inter group p=0.005, for FFI-pain difference inter group p=0.002) and FFI-disability (for after treatment FFI-disability inter group p=0.023, for FFI-disability difference inter group p=0.0001) scores. To conclude, although both kinesio taping and ESWT treatments reduced patients' pain, disability and activity limitation, kinesio taping was found to be more effective in reducing pain and disability. Studies with longer follow-up are needed to clarify our results.
运动贴贴与体外冲击波治疗跟骨刺的短期疗效比较
跟骨刺是脚后跟疼痛的常见原因,有多种治疗方法。我们在这项研究的目的是探讨运动贴贴对抗体外冲击波疗法(ESWT)治疗跟骨刺的有效性。本研究设计为随机对照、前瞻性、单中心临床试验。共纳入93例跟骨刺患者(男性18例,女性75例)。采用分层随机化方法将患者分为两组(基于性别、年龄、BMI和疼痛持续时间)(肌内建磁带组=46例,ESWT组=47例)。第一组患者进行3次ESWT治疗,每次间隔1周。第二组采用肌内效贴敷。每周使用一次,持续3周。记录两组患者治疗前和治疗结束后1周的视觉模拟评分(VAS)和足功能指数(FFI)评分。当我们评估治疗前和治疗后参数时,我们发现两组患者的VAS、ffi -疼痛、ffi -残疾和ffi活动限制评分均显著降低(p=0.0001)。我们还发现,在降低ffi -疼痛(治疗后ffi -疼痛组间p=0.005, ffi -疼痛组间差异p=0.002)和ffi -残疾(治疗后ffi -残疾组间p=0.023, ffi -残疾组间差异p=0.0001)评分方面,肌内运动贴贴比ESWT更有效。综上所述,尽管肌内效贴敷和ESWT治疗都能减轻患者的疼痛、残疾和活动限制,但肌内效贴敷在减轻疼痛和残疾方面更有效。需要更长的随访研究来澄清我们的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: The Tokai Journal of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, also referred to as Tokai Journal, is an official quarterly publication of the Tokai Medical Association. Tokai Journal publishes original articles that deal with issues of clinical, experimental, socioeconomic, cultural and/or historical importance to medical science and related fields. Manuscripts may be submitted as full-length Original Articles or Brief Communications. Tokai Journal also publishes reviews and symposium proceedings. Articles accepted for publication in Tokai Journal cannot be reproduced elsewhere without written permission from the Tokai Medical Association. In addition, Tokai Journal will not be held responsible for the opinions of the authors expressed in the published articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信