Design Students Between Traditional And Digital Learning: Usability Of Learning Management Systems And Preferences For Learning Environment Based On Course Type

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Ghada Salman Alhalasa
{"title":"Design Students Between Traditional And Digital Learning: Usability Of Learning Management Systems And Preferences For Learning Environment Based On Course Type","authors":"Ghada Salman Alhalasa","doi":"10.59670/jns.v34i.1933","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Due to the educational transformation from traditional to digital learning in Jordan, caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, the purpose of this study was to contribute to this transformation in design education. Considering the practical nature of graphic and interior design education, this study aims to evaluate the usability of the Moodle-Learning Management System based on design students' assessments. It also aims to explore design students' preferences for learning environments; (Traditional, Online, Blended) based on course types in design programs (non-design courses, theoretical design courses, and practical/ studio-based courses). A quantitative approach was employed using a designed questionnaire developed from the Shackel usability model (1991) to conduct the research study. A total of (218) undergraduate graphic and interior design students from the design department at Yarmouk University participated in this study, and all the questionnaires were collected and analyzed in SPSS. The findings of this study have indicated that both the practical nature of design education and the late adoption of digital learning affect the usability evaluation of LMS and design students’ preferences for the learning environment. It was concluded that there is a need for implementing new pedagogies to enhance design students' experience, satisfaction, and acceptance of digital learning.","PeriodicalId":37633,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Namibian Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Namibian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59670/jns.v34i.1933","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Due to the educational transformation from traditional to digital learning in Jordan, caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, the purpose of this study was to contribute to this transformation in design education. Considering the practical nature of graphic and interior design education, this study aims to evaluate the usability of the Moodle-Learning Management System based on design students' assessments. It also aims to explore design students' preferences for learning environments; (Traditional, Online, Blended) based on course types in design programs (non-design courses, theoretical design courses, and practical/ studio-based courses). A quantitative approach was employed using a designed questionnaire developed from the Shackel usability model (1991) to conduct the research study. A total of (218) undergraduate graphic and interior design students from the design department at Yarmouk University participated in this study, and all the questionnaires were collected and analyzed in SPSS. The findings of this study have indicated that both the practical nature of design education and the late adoption of digital learning affect the usability evaluation of LMS and design students’ preferences for the learning environment. It was concluded that there is a need for implementing new pedagogies to enhance design students' experience, satisfaction, and acceptance of digital learning.
在传统和数字学习之间设计学生:学习管理系统的可用性和基于课程类型的学习环境偏好
由于COVID-19大流行导致约旦的教育从传统学习向数字化学习转变,本研究的目的是为设计教育的这种转变做出贡献。考虑到平面与室内设计教育的实践性,本研究旨在基于设计专业学生的评估来评估moodle学习管理系统的可用性。它还旨在探讨设计学生对学习环境的偏好;(传统、在线、混合)基于设计课程的课程类型(非设计课程、理论设计课程和实践/工作室课程)。本研究采用定量方法,根据Shackel可用性模型(1991)设计问卷进行研究。雅尔穆克大学设计系平面与室内设计专业的218名本科生参与了本次研究,所有的问卷都通过SPSS软件进行了收集和分析。本研究的结果表明,设计教育的实践性和数字化学习的后期采用都会影响LMS的可用性评估和设计专业学生对学习环境的偏好。结论是,有必要实施新的教学方法,以提高设计专业学生对数字学习的体验、满意度和接受度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Namibian Studies
Journal of Namibian Studies Arts and Humanities-History
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: Information not localized
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信