Effect of 0.01% Atropine on Accommodation in Myopic teenages

L. Zhen, W. Jia, Li Guanglin
{"title":"Effect of 0.01% Atropine on Accommodation in Myopic teenages","authors":"L. Zhen, W. Jia, Li Guanglin","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-845X.2019.12.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: \nTo study the effect of 0.01% atropine on accommodation in myopic teenages. \n \n \nMethods: \nA prospective non-randomized controlled study was conducted. Sixty-one children (122 eyes) with low to moderate myopia were selected at the Second People's Hospital of Liaocheng from April 2015 to June 2018. Patients (aged 13-16 years old (average age, 14.4±0.9 years) were divided into an atropine group (30 patients, 60 eyes) and a control group (31 patients, 62 eyes) according to the wishes of the guardians. Sodium hyaluronateeye drops were used once in the control group and the atropine group was treated once with 0.01% atropine eye drops. In the atropine group, near vision, accommodative amplitude and accommodative facility were measured at 2 h, 4 h and 6 h after atropine treatment, and the same parameters were measured in the control group at 2 h and 6 h after treatment with sodium hyaluronate eye drops. The data were analyzed by repeated measures analysis of variance and a t-test. \n \n \nResults: \nThe difference in near vision between the two groups and at the same time-points were not statistically significant (F=0.209, P=0.650; F=0.292, P=0.594) and there was no interaction between group and time (F=0.097, P=0.756). The accommodative amplitude of the atropine group was lower than that of the control group at 2 h after treatment and the difference was statistically significant (t=-13.09, P<0.001). The difference at 6 h after the atropine treatment was not statistically significant compared with sodium hyaluronate treatment (t=-0.26, P=0.797). In the atropine group, the accommodative amplitude at 2 h after treatment (10.09±0.69 D) was significantly lower than the baseline value (12.58±0.88 D) (P<0.001). At 4 h after treatment, the accommodative amplitude (10.98±0.77 D) was higher than that 2 h after treatment (P<0.001), and the difference between the baseline value (12.45±0.77 D) and 6 h after treatment was not statistically significant (P=0.911). The difference in accommodative facility between the two groups was not statistically significant at 2 h and 6 h after treatment. The accommodative facility at different time points in the atropine group was not statistically significant (F=0.09, P=0.965). \n \n \nConclusions: \nAfter a single treatment with 0.01% atropine eye drops, the amplitude of accommodation decreases, but sufficient residual accommodation is retained without affecting near vision or accommodative facility. \n \n \nKey words: \natropine; childhood; myopia; accommodation","PeriodicalId":10142,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Optometry & Ophthalmology","volume":"47 1","pages":"942-946"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Optometry & Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-845X.2019.12.011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To study the effect of 0.01% atropine on accommodation in myopic teenages. Methods: A prospective non-randomized controlled study was conducted. Sixty-one children (122 eyes) with low to moderate myopia were selected at the Second People's Hospital of Liaocheng from April 2015 to June 2018. Patients (aged 13-16 years old (average age, 14.4±0.9 years) were divided into an atropine group (30 patients, 60 eyes) and a control group (31 patients, 62 eyes) according to the wishes of the guardians. Sodium hyaluronateeye drops were used once in the control group and the atropine group was treated once with 0.01% atropine eye drops. In the atropine group, near vision, accommodative amplitude and accommodative facility were measured at 2 h, 4 h and 6 h after atropine treatment, and the same parameters were measured in the control group at 2 h and 6 h after treatment with sodium hyaluronate eye drops. The data were analyzed by repeated measures analysis of variance and a t-test. Results: The difference in near vision between the two groups and at the same time-points were not statistically significant (F=0.209, P=0.650; F=0.292, P=0.594) and there was no interaction between group and time (F=0.097, P=0.756). The accommodative amplitude of the atropine group was lower than that of the control group at 2 h after treatment and the difference was statistically significant (t=-13.09, P<0.001). The difference at 6 h after the atropine treatment was not statistically significant compared with sodium hyaluronate treatment (t=-0.26, P=0.797). In the atropine group, the accommodative amplitude at 2 h after treatment (10.09±0.69 D) was significantly lower than the baseline value (12.58±0.88 D) (P<0.001). At 4 h after treatment, the accommodative amplitude (10.98±0.77 D) was higher than that 2 h after treatment (P<0.001), and the difference between the baseline value (12.45±0.77 D) and 6 h after treatment was not statistically significant (P=0.911). The difference in accommodative facility between the two groups was not statistically significant at 2 h and 6 h after treatment. The accommodative facility at different time points in the atropine group was not statistically significant (F=0.09, P=0.965). Conclusions: After a single treatment with 0.01% atropine eye drops, the amplitude of accommodation decreases, but sufficient residual accommodation is retained without affecting near vision or accommodative facility. Key words: atropine; childhood; myopia; accommodation
0.01%阿托品对近视青少年适应的影响
目的:探讨0.01%阿托品对青少年近视眼的调节作用。方法:采用前瞻性非随机对照研究。选取2015年4月至2018年6月聊城市第二人民医院低中度近视患儿61例(122只眼)。患者年龄13 ~ 16岁(平均年龄14.4±0.9岁),根据监护人意愿分为阿托品组(30例,60眼)和对照组(31例,62眼)。对照组用透明质酸钠滴眼液1次,阿托品组用0.01%阿托品滴眼液1次。阿托品组在阿托品治疗后2 h、4 h、6 h测量近视力、调节幅度、调节便利度,对照组在透明质酸钠滴眼液治疗后2 h、6 h测量相同参数。数据分析采用重复测量方差分析和t检验。结果:两组及同一时间点近视力差异无统计学意义(F=0.209, P=0.650;F=0.292, P=0.594),组与时间无交互作用(F=0.097, P=0.756)。治疗后2 h,阿托品组的调节幅度低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(t=-13.09, P<0.001)。与透明质酸钠治疗相比,阿托品治疗后6 h的差异无统计学意义(t=-0.26, P=0.797)。阿托品组治疗后2 h的调节振幅(10.09±0.69 D)显著低于基线值(12.58±0.88 D) (P<0.001)。治疗后4 h调节幅度(10.98±0.77 D)高于治疗后2 h (P<0.001),治疗后6 h与基线值(12.45±0.77 D)差异无统计学意义(P=0.911)。治疗后2 h、6 h两组患者的调节设施差异无统计学意义。阿托品组不同时间点的调节设施差异无统计学意义(F=0.09, P=0.965)。结论:0.01%阿托品滴眼液单次治疗后,调节幅度减小,但保留了足够的残余调节,不影响近视力和调节功能。关键词:阿托品;童年;近视;住宿
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信