La percepción de la comunidad académica sobre el sistema de investigación y evaluación en Comunicación

IF 1.2 Q3 COMMUNICATION
Ramón Martínez García
{"title":"La percepción de la comunidad académica sobre el sistema de investigación y evaluación en Comunicación","authors":"Ramón Martínez García","doi":"10.33732/ixc/09/01laperc","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to analyze the context in which the Communication is developed as a social practice from a discursive dimension. This work is based on a qualitative perspective of an exploratory nature, so it does not have initial hypotheses. Its objective is to extract the academic community predominant opinion lines on the Communication Research and Evaluation System and its influence in the academic and scientific context. To this end, a Likert-type online survey has been launched on a census of 2,418 researchers in Communication in Spain, reaching 604 responses, representing a response rate of 24.97%. It is assumed that the research community is part of the same academic ecosystem, being all subjects closely interrelated. Therefore, the design of the survey obeys to a model based on three dimensions: knowledge production, institution management and research evaluation. Among the main conclusions stands out the generalized perception that the research and evaluation system has provoked a functionalist dynamic. It conditions the form of research, fully affecting innovation and interruption of scientific discourse. Keywords: Communication meta-research; scientific discourse; evaluation systems; context studies; Likert scale survey.","PeriodicalId":42249,"journal":{"name":"Index Comunicacion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Index Comunicacion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33732/ixc/09/01laperc","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper aims to analyze the context in which the Communication is developed as a social practice from a discursive dimension. This work is based on a qualitative perspective of an exploratory nature, so it does not have initial hypotheses. Its objective is to extract the academic community predominant opinion lines on the Communication Research and Evaluation System and its influence in the academic and scientific context. To this end, a Likert-type online survey has been launched on a census of 2,418 researchers in Communication in Spain, reaching 604 responses, representing a response rate of 24.97%. It is assumed that the research community is part of the same academic ecosystem, being all subjects closely interrelated. Therefore, the design of the survey obeys to a model based on three dimensions: knowledge production, institution management and research evaluation. Among the main conclusions stands out the generalized perception that the research and evaluation system has provoked a functionalist dynamic. It conditions the form of research, fully affecting innovation and interruption of scientific discourse. Keywords: Communication meta-research; scientific discourse; evaluation systems; context studies; Likert scale survey.
学术团体对传播研究与评价体系的看法
本文旨在从话语维度分析交际作为一种社会实践发展的语境。这项工作是基于一种探索性质的定性视角,因此它没有最初的假设。其目的是提取学术界对传播研究与评价体系及其在学术和科学背景下的影响的主要意见线。为此,在西班牙对2,418名传播学研究人员进行了一次李克特式的在线调查,得到604份回复,回复率为24.97%。假设研究社区是同一个学术生态系统的一部分,所有学科都密切相关。因此,调查设计遵循基于知识生产、机构管理和研究评价三个维度的模型。在主要结论中,有一种普遍的看法认为,研究和评价体系引发了一种功能主义的动力。它制约着研究的形式,充分影响着科学话语的创新和中断。关键词:传播学元研究;科学话语;评价系统;背景研究;李克特量表调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Index Comunicacion
Index Comunicacion COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
28
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信