Afropolitanism

IF 0.1 0 ART
Achille Mbembe, L. Chauvet
{"title":"Afropolitanism","authors":"Achille Mbembe, L. Chauvet","doi":"10.18574/nyu/9781479829682.003.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:African discourse has been dominated for almost a century by three politico-intellectual paradigms: anticolonial nationalism, various reinterpretations of Marxism, and a Pan-African sphere of influence that gave special place to two types of solidarity—a racial and transnational solidarity, and an international and anti-imperialist solidarity. In addressing the question, “Who is African and who is not?,” the author reminds readers that traces of Africa cover the face of the capitalist and Islamic worlds. The precolonial history of African societies is a history of colliding cultures and can hardly be understood outside the paradigm of itinerancy, mobility, and displacement. In addition to the forced migrations of the previous centuries, there have also been migrations driven by colonization. Today, millions of people of African origin are citizens of various countries of the world—a historical phenomenon he calls worlds in movement. Awareness of the interweaving of the here and there; embracing, with full knowledge of the facts, strangeness, foreignness, and remoteness; the ability to recognize one’s face in that of a foreigner and to make the most of the traces of remoteness in closeness; to domesticate the unfamiliar; to work with what seem to be opposites—it is this cultural, historical, and aesthetic sensitivity that underlies the term Afropolitanism—a political and cultural stance in relation to the nation, to race, and to the issue of difference in general. Today, many Africans live outside Africa or live on the continent but not necessarily in their countries of birth. They have had the opportunity to experience several worlds. They are developing a transnational culture the author calls “Afropolitan.”","PeriodicalId":41573,"journal":{"name":"Nka-Journal of Contemporary African Art","volume":"16 1","pages":"56 - 61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"70","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nka-Journal of Contemporary African Art","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9781479829682.003.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 70

Abstract

ABSTRACT:African discourse has been dominated for almost a century by three politico-intellectual paradigms: anticolonial nationalism, various reinterpretations of Marxism, and a Pan-African sphere of influence that gave special place to two types of solidarity—a racial and transnational solidarity, and an international and anti-imperialist solidarity. In addressing the question, “Who is African and who is not?,” the author reminds readers that traces of Africa cover the face of the capitalist and Islamic worlds. The precolonial history of African societies is a history of colliding cultures and can hardly be understood outside the paradigm of itinerancy, mobility, and displacement. In addition to the forced migrations of the previous centuries, there have also been migrations driven by colonization. Today, millions of people of African origin are citizens of various countries of the world—a historical phenomenon he calls worlds in movement. Awareness of the interweaving of the here and there; embracing, with full knowledge of the facts, strangeness, foreignness, and remoteness; the ability to recognize one’s face in that of a foreigner and to make the most of the traces of remoteness in closeness; to domesticate the unfamiliar; to work with what seem to be opposites—it is this cultural, historical, and aesthetic sensitivity that underlies the term Afropolitanism—a political and cultural stance in relation to the nation, to race, and to the issue of difference in general. Today, many Africans live outside Africa or live on the continent but not necessarily in their countries of birth. They have had the opportunity to experience several worlds. They are developing a transnational culture the author calls “Afropolitan.”
摘要:近一个世纪以来,非洲话语一直被三种政治-知识范式所主导:反殖民主义的民族主义,对马克思主义的各种重新解释,以及一种泛非势力范围,这种势力范围给予两种类型的团结——种族和跨国团结,以及国际和反帝国主义团结——以特殊的地位。在回答“谁是非洲人,谁不是?”,作者提醒读者,非洲的痕迹掩盖了资本主义和伊斯兰世界的面貌。非洲社会的前殖民历史是一部文化碰撞的历史,很难脱离巡回、流动和流离失所的范式来理解。除了前几个世纪的被迫移徙外,还有殖民化造成的移徙。今天,数以百万计的非洲裔是世界各国的公民——他称之为“运动中的世界”的历史现象。意识到这里和那里的交织;在充分了解事实的情况下,欣然接受陌生、异域和遥远;能够从外国人的面孔中认出自己的面孔,并在亲近中充分利用疏远的痕迹;驯化:驯化不熟悉的事物;与看似相反的事物合作——正是这种文化、历史和审美敏感性构成了“非洲政治主义”一词的基础——一种与国家、种族和普遍差异问题有关的政治和文化立场。今天,许多非洲人生活在非洲以外,或者生活在非洲大陆,但不一定生活在他们的出生国。他们有机会体验几个世界。他们正在发展一种被作者称为“非洲人文化”的跨国文化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信