Big Data Analysis Report on Trial of Obstetrics and Gynecology Medical Damage Liability Dispute Cases in China from 2017 to 2021

Yushu Wu, Jing Li, Yong Zhang, Songyue He, Zhiyong Wang, Changqing Cui
{"title":"Big Data Analysis Report on Trial of Obstetrics and Gynecology Medical Damage Liability Dispute Cases in China from 2017 to 2021","authors":"Yushu Wu, Jing Li, Yong Zhang, Songyue He, Zhiyong Wang, Changqing Cui","doi":"10.32629/jcmr.v3i4.1085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To analyze the data of the trial cases of medical damage liability disputes in obstetrics and gynecology from 2017 to 2021, with a clear understanding of Chinese medical damage liability disputes. Methods: The data of medical damage liability dispute cases in obstetrics and gynecology during 2017-2021 were collected and analyzed. The analysis directions included (1) The trial types of civil litigation cases in each year; (2) Annual distribution of civil litigation cases in obstetrics and gynecology in an annual year basis; (3) Distribution of the amount of the subject matter and the amount of civil compensation; (4) The geographical distribution of litigation cases; (5) Characteristics of the medical institution as defendant; (6) Distribution of litigation departments in medical institutions; (7) Common causes of action in obstetrics and gynecology cases; (8) Results of common injuries in obstetrics and gynecology cases; (9) Court confirmation of disputes over medical records. Results: According to the data analysis results, the distribution of litigation trial types, annual distribution, compensation amount distribution, regional distribution and other basic data were obtained, and based on the analysis of the characteristics of medical institutions, department distribution, causes of litigation, damage structure and court recognition results were systematically discussed. Conclusion: Although the liability disputes for medical damage in obstetrics and gynecology have been declining in recent years, the problems in medical treatment and management can not be ignored. Attention should be paid to them and medical problems should be avoided.","PeriodicalId":15431,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine Research","volume":"180 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32629/jcmr.v3i4.1085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the data of the trial cases of medical damage liability disputes in obstetrics and gynecology from 2017 to 2021, with a clear understanding of Chinese medical damage liability disputes. Methods: The data of medical damage liability dispute cases in obstetrics and gynecology during 2017-2021 were collected and analyzed. The analysis directions included (1) The trial types of civil litigation cases in each year; (2) Annual distribution of civil litigation cases in obstetrics and gynecology in an annual year basis; (3) Distribution of the amount of the subject matter and the amount of civil compensation; (4) The geographical distribution of litigation cases; (5) Characteristics of the medical institution as defendant; (6) Distribution of litigation departments in medical institutions; (7) Common causes of action in obstetrics and gynecology cases; (8) Results of common injuries in obstetrics and gynecology cases; (9) Court confirmation of disputes over medical records. Results: According to the data analysis results, the distribution of litigation trial types, annual distribution, compensation amount distribution, regional distribution and other basic data were obtained, and based on the analysis of the characteristics of medical institutions, department distribution, causes of litigation, damage structure and court recognition results were systematically discussed. Conclusion: Although the liability disputes for medical damage in obstetrics and gynecology have been declining in recent years, the problems in medical treatment and management can not be ignored. Attention should be paid to them and medical problems should be avoided.
2017 - 2021年中国妇产科医疗损害责任纠纷案件审判大数据分析报告
目的:分析2017 - 2021年妇产科医疗损害责任纠纷案件的审判数据,对我国医疗损害责任纠纷有一个清晰的认识。方法:收集2017-2021年妇产科医疗损害责任纠纷案件数据并进行分析。分析方向包括:(1)各年度民事诉讼案件的审理类型;(2)妇产科民事诉讼案件年度分布情况;(三)标的物数额和民事赔偿数额的分配;(四)诉讼案件的地域分布;(五)作为被告的医疗机构的特点;(六)医疗机构诉讼部门的布局;(7)妇产科病例常见诉因;(8)妇产科病例常见损伤结果;(九)医疗记录纠纷的法院确认。结果:根据数据分析结果,获得了诉讼审判类型分布、年度分布、赔偿金额分布、地区分布等基础数据,并在分析医疗机构特点的基础上,系统探讨了部门分布、诉讼原因、损害赔偿结构和法院认定结果。结论:近年来妇产科医疗损害责任纠纷虽呈下降趋势,但医疗管理中存在的问题也不容忽视。应引起注意,避免出现医疗问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信