Measurement of Protein Hydrophobicity

Shuryo Nakai
{"title":"Measurement of Protein Hydrophobicity","authors":"Shuryo Nakai","doi":"10.1002/0471142913.fab0502s09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Among numerous methods reported in the literature for analysis of protein hydrophobicty, the only methods of potential use for routine food analysis were chosen here. The most popular methods are probe spectrofluorometry using ANS, CPA, DPH, and Prodan. Additional methods selected were SDS binding, hydrophobic interaction chromatography, contact angle, and hydrophobic partition. All methods are relatively easy to conduct when need has arisen to confirm controversial data, such as those obtained by using probe spectrofluorometry. Advantages and disadvantages of different methods are compared. Importance of the relationships with functionality of proteins in food processing is emphasized because the true meaning of surface hydrophobicity of proteins is difficult to define.</p>","PeriodicalId":100346,"journal":{"name":"Current Protocols in Food Analytical Chemistry","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/0471142913.fab0502s09","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Protocols in Food Analytical Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/0471142913.fab0502s09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Among numerous methods reported in the literature for analysis of protein hydrophobicty, the only methods of potential use for routine food analysis were chosen here. The most popular methods are probe spectrofluorometry using ANS, CPA, DPH, and Prodan. Additional methods selected were SDS binding, hydrophobic interaction chromatography, contact angle, and hydrophobic partition. All methods are relatively easy to conduct when need has arisen to confirm controversial data, such as those obtained by using probe spectrofluorometry. Advantages and disadvantages of different methods are compared. Importance of the relationships with functionality of proteins in food processing is emphasized because the true meaning of surface hydrophobicity of proteins is difficult to define.

蛋白质疏水性的测定
在文献中报道的许多分析蛋白质疏水性的方法中,这里选择了唯一可能用于常规食品分析的方法。最常用的方法是使用ANS、CPA、DPH和Prodan的探针荧光光谱法。其他选择的方法有SDS结合、疏水相互作用色谱、接触角和疏水分割。当需要证实有争议的数据时,所有方法都相对容易进行,例如使用探针荧光光谱法获得的数据。比较了不同方法的优缺点。由于蛋白质表面疏水性的真正含义难以定义,因此强调了蛋白质在食品加工中与功能关系的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信