Practice-based research with psychologists-in-training: presentation of a supervision model and use of routine outcome monitoring (Investigación basada en la práctica con psicólogos en formación: presentación de un modelo de supervisión y uso de la monitorización rutinaria de resultados)

IF 0.2 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Jorge Valdiviezo-Oña, Eduardo Granja, A. Cuadros-López, Grace Valdivieso-Meza, Chris Evans, Clara Paz
{"title":"Practice-based research with psychologists-in-training: presentation of a supervision model and use of routine outcome monitoring (Investigación basada en la práctica con psicólogos en formación: presentación de un modelo de supervisión y uso de la monitorización rutinaria de resultados)","authors":"Jorge Valdiviezo-Oña, Eduardo Granja, A. Cuadros-López, Grace Valdivieso-Meza, Chris Evans, Clara Paz","doi":"10.1080/02109395.2022.2132749","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Objective: To present the training and care model used in a university psychological care centre and its outcomes, framed in the Practice-Based Evidence paradigm. Methods: Naturalistic study on the results of 161 clients seen between 2018 and 2020 who completed the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation — Outcome Measure. Statistically significant change was measured using multilevel regression models and reliable and clinically significant change was measured by applying the Jacobson and Truax approach. Results: On average, clients were 29.47 years old (SD = 10.11) and the median number of sessions that they attended was five. CORE-OM scores decreased 0.05 points per session and trajectories of change were identified as diverse. Of the total number of clients, 29.4% showed reliable and clinically significant change and 45.1% showed at least reliable change. Discussion: The routine outcome monitoring results from this centre allow us to refine certain training and supervision activities to improve quality-of-care indicators.","PeriodicalId":41002,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Psychology-Psikoloji Calismalari Dergisi","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Psychology-Psikoloji Calismalari Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02109395.2022.2132749","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective: To present the training and care model used in a university psychological care centre and its outcomes, framed in the Practice-Based Evidence paradigm. Methods: Naturalistic study on the results of 161 clients seen between 2018 and 2020 who completed the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation — Outcome Measure. Statistically significant change was measured using multilevel regression models and reliable and clinically significant change was measured by applying the Jacobson and Truax approach. Results: On average, clients were 29.47 years old (SD = 10.11) and the median number of sessions that they attended was five. CORE-OM scores decreased 0.05 points per session and trajectories of change were identified as diverse. Of the total number of clients, 29.4% showed reliable and clinically significant change and 45.1% showed at least reliable change. Discussion: The routine outcome monitoring results from this centre allow us to refine certain training and supervision activities to improve quality-of-care indicators.
与训练心理学家的基于实践的研究:介绍一种监督模型和常规结果监测的使用(与训练心理学家的基于实践的研究:介绍一种监督模型和常规结果监测的使用)
摘要目的:介绍在基于实践的证据范式框架下,在大学心理护理中心使用的培训和护理模式及其结果。方法:对2018 - 2020年间完成常规评估-结果测量临床结果的161例患者的结果进行自然研究。采用多水平回归模型测量具有统计学意义的变化,采用Jacobson和Truax方法测量可靠且具有临床意义的变化。结果:客户的平均年龄为29.47岁(SD = 10.11),他们参加的会议中位数为5次。CORE-OM分数每节下降0.05分,变化轨迹是多样的。在所有患者中,29.4%的患者表现出可靠且临床显著的变化,45.1%的患者表现出至少可靠的变化。讨论:该中心的常规结果监测结果使我们能够改进某些培训和监督活动,以提高护理质量指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信