ASSESSING STUDENTS' CONSECUTIVE INTERPRETING QUALITY (A CASE STUDY IN ENGLISH LITERATURE STUDY PROGRAM)

Ikrima Budiawati, O. S. Djuharie, Andang Saehu
{"title":"ASSESSING STUDENTS' CONSECUTIVE INTERPRETING QUALITY (A CASE STUDY IN ENGLISH LITERATURE STUDY PROGRAM)","authors":"Ikrima Budiawati, O. S. Djuharie, Andang Saehu","doi":"10.31949/jell.v6i1.2632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aims to assess the quality of students’ consecutive interpreting in terms accuracy, fluency, and acceptability in English Literature study program, Faculty of Adab and Humanities, UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung. This research uses qualitative case study method with the results that shows 153 data from 10 students that have interpreted the messages consecutively. In terms of accuracy, there are 137 (89.56%) data were transferred accurately, 11 (7.18%) data were transferred less accurately, and 5 (3.26) data were transferred inaccurately. In terms of fluency, there are 125 (81.69%) data were transferred fluently, 25 (16.33%) data were transferred less fluently, and 3 (1.98%) data were not transferred fluently. Meanwhile, in terms of acceptability there are 128 (83.66%) data were transferred acceptable, 20 (13.07%) data were transferred less acceptable, and 5 (3.27%) data were transferred not acceptable. This research shows students are having considerable skill in interpreting the messages from source language into the target language consecutively. \nKeyword: Accuracy, Fluency, Acceptability","PeriodicalId":34871,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research on English and Language Learning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research on English and Language Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31949/jell.v6i1.2632","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research aims to assess the quality of students’ consecutive interpreting in terms accuracy, fluency, and acceptability in English Literature study program, Faculty of Adab and Humanities, UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung. This research uses qualitative case study method with the results that shows 153 data from 10 students that have interpreted the messages consecutively. In terms of accuracy, there are 137 (89.56%) data were transferred accurately, 11 (7.18%) data were transferred less accurately, and 5 (3.26) data were transferred inaccurately. In terms of fluency, there are 125 (81.69%) data were transferred fluently, 25 (16.33%) data were transferred less fluently, and 3 (1.98%) data were not transferred fluently. Meanwhile, in terms of acceptability there are 128 (83.66%) data were transferred acceptable, 20 (13.07%) data were transferred less acceptable, and 5 (3.27%) data were transferred not acceptable. This research shows students are having considerable skill in interpreting the messages from source language into the target language consecutively. Keyword: Accuracy, Fluency, Acceptability
学生交替传译质量评估(以英语文学专业为例)
本研究旨在评估苏南大学人文学院英语文学专业学生交替传译的准确性、流畅性和可接受性。本研究采用定性案例研究方法,结果显示了10名学生连续解读信息的153个数据。准确性方面,准确传输数据137例(89.56%),不准确传输数据11例(7.18%),不准确传输数据5例(3.26)。在流畅性方面,125条(81.69%)数据传输流畅,25条(16.33%)数据传输不流畅,3条(1.98%)数据传输不流畅。同时,在可接受性方面,传输可接受的数据有128条(83.66%),传输不太可接受的数据有20条(13.07%),传输不可接受的数据有5条(3.27%)。该研究表明,学生在将原语信息连续翻译成目的语方面具有相当的技能。关键词:准确性,流畅性,可接受性
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信