{"title":"Deconstructing the interaction of glu-plasminogen with its receptor α-enolase","authors":"N. Andronicos, M. Baker, M. Lackmann, M. Ranson","doi":"10.1054/FIPR.2000.0090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objective: Plasminogen binds with apparent low affinity to cell-surface receptors via its lysine binding sites. This enhances/stabilizes the activation-susceptible conformation. However, it is not known whether this lysine-mediated conformational change of plasminogen may affect its subsequent dissociation rate and hence its stability at the cell surface. Therefore, we sought to determine the relationship between the lysine-dependent conformation of plasminogen and its dissociation rate from its receptor. Design: BIACORE experiments were used to determine the kinetics of the interaction of glu-plasminogen with its receptor α-enolase. Intrinsic and extrinsic fluorescence spectroscopy were utilized to confirm if α-enolase induced a conformational change to glu-plasminogen as predicted by analyses of the BIACORE data. Results: The dissociation of glu-plasminogen from α-enolase was mediated by at least two components with apparent dissociation rate constants of kd1= 4.7 × 10−2s−1and kd2= 1.6 × 10−3s−1. This second slower dissociation event reflects an increase in the stability of the complex. Global analysis of the interaction suggested a two-state conformational change reaction, mediated by a concentration-dependent increase in the initial association rate constant. The apparent Kdpredicted by this analysis was 1μM. Fluorescence spectroscopy confirmed that α-enolase induced a more open conformation of glu-plasminogen. Conclusions: These results provide direct evidence that the binding of glu-plasminogen to α-enolase is not simply a low-affinity interaction, but involves a multivalent, competition binding reaction that is associated with a glu-plasminogen conformational change. This mechanism is compatible with the structure of glu-plasminogen. This has implications for the stability of binding and activation of glu-plasminogen at the cell surface.","PeriodicalId":100526,"journal":{"name":"Fibrinolysis and Proteolysis","volume":"72 1","pages":"327-336"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fibrinolysis and Proteolysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1054/FIPR.2000.0090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15
Abstract
Abstract Objective: Plasminogen binds with apparent low affinity to cell-surface receptors via its lysine binding sites. This enhances/stabilizes the activation-susceptible conformation. However, it is not known whether this lysine-mediated conformational change of plasminogen may affect its subsequent dissociation rate and hence its stability at the cell surface. Therefore, we sought to determine the relationship between the lysine-dependent conformation of plasminogen and its dissociation rate from its receptor. Design: BIACORE experiments were used to determine the kinetics of the interaction of glu-plasminogen with its receptor α-enolase. Intrinsic and extrinsic fluorescence spectroscopy were utilized to confirm if α-enolase induced a conformational change to glu-plasminogen as predicted by analyses of the BIACORE data. Results: The dissociation of glu-plasminogen from α-enolase was mediated by at least two components with apparent dissociation rate constants of kd1= 4.7 × 10−2s−1and kd2= 1.6 × 10−3s−1. This second slower dissociation event reflects an increase in the stability of the complex. Global analysis of the interaction suggested a two-state conformational change reaction, mediated by a concentration-dependent increase in the initial association rate constant. The apparent Kdpredicted by this analysis was 1μM. Fluorescence spectroscopy confirmed that α-enolase induced a more open conformation of glu-plasminogen. Conclusions: These results provide direct evidence that the binding of glu-plasminogen to α-enolase is not simply a low-affinity interaction, but involves a multivalent, competition binding reaction that is associated with a glu-plasminogen conformational change. This mechanism is compatible with the structure of glu-plasminogen. This has implications for the stability of binding and activation of glu-plasminogen at the cell surface.