CATEGORIZATION OF EVERYDAY SOUNDS BY EGYPTIAN COCHLEAR IMPLANT CHILDREN

Hasnaa Zakaria Abdelfattah, N. Kamal, Tayseer Taha Abdel, Rahman, Ghada Khalil
{"title":"CATEGORIZATION OF EVERYDAY SOUNDS BY EGYPTIAN COCHLEAR IMPLANT CHILDREN","authors":"Hasnaa Zakaria Abdelfattah, N. Kamal, Tayseer Taha Abdel, Rahman, Ghada Khalil","doi":"10.21608/asmj.2022.270236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Cochlear implantation is a common surgical procedure for children with profound hearing loss who receive minimal or no benefit from traditional hearing aids. Auditory categorization is an important process in the perception and understanding of everyday sounds. This process involves both high level cognitive processes and low-level perceptual encoding of the acoustic signal. Aim of the work : To understand the ability of a cohort of Egyptian children with Cochlear Implant to perceive everyday sounds compared to normal hearing children. Patient and Methods: Ninety subjects divided into 2 groups were included in the present study. Group I: Fifty normal hearing children (NH). Group II: Forty CI users. A set of 18 natural stimuli were studied. They were chosen to cover a broad range of everyday sounds that corresponded to four mains a priori categories: nonlinguistic human vocalizations, animal vocalizations, environmental sounds& musical instruments. Children were asked to name/identify the sounds in an open-set identification task. Results: Results showed that cochlear implant users were different from normal hearing listeners regarding the perception of individual sounds. Normal hearing children could identify sounds better than the CI children. In normal hearing children, the best identification was for human vocalizations, while in cochlear implant children the best identification was for animal vocalizations. Both groups had lower identification scores for both environmental and musical sounds. Sound identification scores increased with increasing chronological age of both groups. Conclusion: Cochlear implant children have reduced relative ability toward identification of superordinate category of nonlinguistic human vocalizations compared to age and gender matched normal hearing children.","PeriodicalId":7450,"journal":{"name":"Ain Shams Medical Journal","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ain Shams Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/asmj.2022.270236","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Cochlear implantation is a common surgical procedure for children with profound hearing loss who receive minimal or no benefit from traditional hearing aids. Auditory categorization is an important process in the perception and understanding of everyday sounds. This process involves both high level cognitive processes and low-level perceptual encoding of the acoustic signal. Aim of the work : To understand the ability of a cohort of Egyptian children with Cochlear Implant to perceive everyday sounds compared to normal hearing children. Patient and Methods: Ninety subjects divided into 2 groups were included in the present study. Group I: Fifty normal hearing children (NH). Group II: Forty CI users. A set of 18 natural stimuli were studied. They were chosen to cover a broad range of everyday sounds that corresponded to four mains a priori categories: nonlinguistic human vocalizations, animal vocalizations, environmental sounds& musical instruments. Children were asked to name/identify the sounds in an open-set identification task. Results: Results showed that cochlear implant users were different from normal hearing listeners regarding the perception of individual sounds. Normal hearing children could identify sounds better than the CI children. In normal hearing children, the best identification was for human vocalizations, while in cochlear implant children the best identification was for animal vocalizations. Both groups had lower identification scores for both environmental and musical sounds. Sound identification scores increased with increasing chronological age of both groups. Conclusion: Cochlear implant children have reduced relative ability toward identification of superordinate category of nonlinguistic human vocalizations compared to age and gender matched normal hearing children.
埃及人工耳蜗儿童日常发音的分类
背景:人工耳蜗植入术是重度听力损失儿童的常见手术,这些儿童从传统助听器中获得的益处很少或没有。听觉分类是感知和理解日常声音的重要过程。这一过程既包括高水平的认知过程,也包括低水平的声信号感知编码。这项工作的目的是:了解与正常听力的儿童相比,一组植入人工耳蜗的埃及儿童感知日常声音的能力。患者与方法:90例患者分为两组。第一组:听力正常儿童50例。组II: 40个CI用户。研究了一组18种自然刺激。他们被选为涵盖广泛的日常声音,对应于四个主要的先验类别:非语言人类发声,动物发声,环境声音和乐器。孩子们被要求在一个开放式的识别任务中说出/识别声音。结果:人工耳蜗使用者对单个声音的感知与正常听者不同。听力正常的儿童比CI儿童能更好地识别声音。正常听力儿童对人声的识别效果最好,而人工耳蜗儿童对动物声的识别效果最好。两组人对环境和音乐声音的识别得分都较低。声音识别分数随两组实足年龄的增加而增加。结论:与年龄和性别匹配的正常听力儿童相比,人工耳蜗儿童对非语言人类发声上级类别的相对识别能力有所下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信