The effect of staff nurse participation in a clinical nursing research project on attitude towards, access to, support of and use of research in the acute care setting.

Joan Tranmer, Jacquelyn Lochhaus, Miu Lam
{"title":"The effect of staff nurse participation in a clinical nursing research project on attitude towards, access to, support of and use of research in the acute care setting.","authors":"Joan Tranmer, Jacquelyn Lochhaus, Miu Lam","doi":"10.12927/CJNL.2002.19137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of participation in research on staff nurses' attitude towards, access to, perceived support of and reported use of research in practice. Six medical surgical units in a southeastern Ontario teaching hospital were randomly assigned to receive 3 different levels of exposure to research: high, low and usual. On the high participation units, a clinical research group consisting of the investigator and interested nurses (n = 18) critiqued research literature related to an important clinical issue (i.e., patterns of sleep) and designed and implemented a clinical research study. On the low participation units, a similar clinical research group (n = 10) met once and were involved, solely, in the design and implementation of the clinical research protocol. On the control units, there were no formalized research groups or activities. All registered nurses (n = 235), including the research group participants, on the 6 units were surveyed with a research utilization questionnaire (RUQ) pre and post participant intervention. The RUQ scores were higher on the high participation units at baseline and post intervention in comparison to the low and control units. Nurses who participated directly in the clinical research groups (high and low) reported similar RUQ scores post intervention and higher scores in comparison to all nurses. All RUQ scores were higher post intervention. Nurses with clinical expertise but minimal research expertise participated meaningfully in clinical research. While participation had an individual effect there was no unit effect, suggesting other factors, such as organizational support and culture, are important determinants of research use.","PeriodicalId":80260,"journal":{"name":"Canadian journal of nursing leadership","volume":"85 1","pages":"18-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"49","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian journal of nursing leadership","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12927/CJNL.2002.19137","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 49

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of participation in research on staff nurses' attitude towards, access to, perceived support of and reported use of research in practice. Six medical surgical units in a southeastern Ontario teaching hospital were randomly assigned to receive 3 different levels of exposure to research: high, low and usual. On the high participation units, a clinical research group consisting of the investigator and interested nurses (n = 18) critiqued research literature related to an important clinical issue (i.e., patterns of sleep) and designed and implemented a clinical research study. On the low participation units, a similar clinical research group (n = 10) met once and were involved, solely, in the design and implementation of the clinical research protocol. On the control units, there were no formalized research groups or activities. All registered nurses (n = 235), including the research group participants, on the 6 units were surveyed with a research utilization questionnaire (RUQ) pre and post participant intervention. The RUQ scores were higher on the high participation units at baseline and post intervention in comparison to the low and control units. Nurses who participated directly in the clinical research groups (high and low) reported similar RUQ scores post intervention and higher scores in comparison to all nurses. All RUQ scores were higher post intervention. Nurses with clinical expertise but minimal research expertise participated meaningfully in clinical research. While participation had an individual effect there was no unit effect, suggesting other factors, such as organizational support and culture, are important determinants of research use.
护理人员参与临床护理研究项目对急症护理研究的态度、获取、支持和使用的影响。
本研究的目的是确定参与研究对护理人员对研究的态度、获取、感知支持和在实践中报告使用的影响。安大略省东南部一所教学医院的六个外科单位被随机分配接受三种不同程度的研究:高、低和普通。在高参与单元,由研究者和感兴趣的护士组成的临床研究小组(n = 18)对与重要临床问题(即睡眠模式)相关的研究文献进行了评论,并设计和实施了一项临床研究。在低参与单位,一个类似的临床研究小组(n = 10)开会一次,单独参与临床研究方案的设计和实施。在对照组,没有正式的研究小组或活动。采用研究利用问卷(RUQ)对6个单位的所有注册护士(235名)进行干预前后调查。在基线和干预后,高参与单元的RUQ得分高于低参与单元和对照单元。直接参加临床研究组的护士(高和低)在干预后报告了相似的RUQ得分,并且与所有护士相比得分更高。干预后所有RUQ得分均较高。具有临床专业知识但缺乏研究专业知识的护士参与了有意义的临床研究。虽然参与有个人效应,但没有单位效应,这表明其他因素,如组织支持和文化,是研究使用的重要决定因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书