N-body simulations of planet formation via pebble accretion. II. How to form various giant planets

IF 27.8 1区 物理与天体物理 Q1 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
S. Matsumura, R. Brasser, S. Ida
{"title":"N-body simulations of planet formation via pebble accretion. II. How to form various giant planets","authors":"S. Matsumura, R. Brasser, S. Ida","doi":"10.1051/0004-6361/202039210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims. The connection between initial disc conditions and final orbital and physical properties of planets is not well-understood. In this paper, we numerically study the formation of planetary systems via pebble accretion and investigate the effects of disc properties such as masses, dissipation timescales, and metallicities on planet formation outcomes. Methods. We improved the N-body code SyMBA that was modified for our paper I by taking account of new planet-disc interaction models and type II migration. We adopted the ‘two-α’ disc model to mimic the effects of both the standard disc turbulence and the mass accretion driven by the magnetic disc wind. Results. We successfully reproduced the overall distribution trends of semi-major axes, eccentricities, and planetary masses of extrasolar giant planets. There are two types of giant planet formation trends, depending on whether or not the disc’s dissipation timescales are comparable to the planet formation timescales. When planet formation happens fast enough, giant planets are fully grown (Jupiter mass or higher) and are distributed widely across the disc. On the other hand, when planet formation is limited by the disc’s dissipation, discs generally form low-mass cold Jupiters (CJs). Our simulations also naturally explain why hot Jupiters (HJs) tend to be alone and how the observed eccentricity-metallicity trends arise. The low-metallicity discs tend to form nearly circular and coplanar HJs in situ, because planet formation is slower than high-metallicity discs, and thus protoplanetary cores migrate significantly before gas accretion. The high-metallicity discs, on the other hand, generate HJs in situ or via tidal circularisation of eccentric orbits. Both pathways usually involve dynamical instabilities, and thus HJs tend to have broader eccentricity and inclination distributions. When giant planets with very wide orbits (’super-cold Jupiters’) are formed via pebble accretion followed by scattering, we predict that they belong to metal-rich stars, have eccentric orbits, and tend to have (∼ 80%) companions interior to their orbits.","PeriodicalId":785,"journal":{"name":"The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":27.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review","FirstCategoryId":"4","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202039210","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Aims. The connection between initial disc conditions and final orbital and physical properties of planets is not well-understood. In this paper, we numerically study the formation of planetary systems via pebble accretion and investigate the effects of disc properties such as masses, dissipation timescales, and metallicities on planet formation outcomes. Methods. We improved the N-body code SyMBA that was modified for our paper I by taking account of new planet-disc interaction models and type II migration. We adopted the ‘two-α’ disc model to mimic the effects of both the standard disc turbulence and the mass accretion driven by the magnetic disc wind. Results. We successfully reproduced the overall distribution trends of semi-major axes, eccentricities, and planetary masses of extrasolar giant planets. There are two types of giant planet formation trends, depending on whether or not the disc’s dissipation timescales are comparable to the planet formation timescales. When planet formation happens fast enough, giant planets are fully grown (Jupiter mass or higher) and are distributed widely across the disc. On the other hand, when planet formation is limited by the disc’s dissipation, discs generally form low-mass cold Jupiters (CJs). Our simulations also naturally explain why hot Jupiters (HJs) tend to be alone and how the observed eccentricity-metallicity trends arise. The low-metallicity discs tend to form nearly circular and coplanar HJs in situ, because planet formation is slower than high-metallicity discs, and thus protoplanetary cores migrate significantly before gas accretion. The high-metallicity discs, on the other hand, generate HJs in situ or via tidal circularisation of eccentric orbits. Both pathways usually involve dynamical instabilities, and thus HJs tend to have broader eccentricity and inclination distributions. When giant planets with very wide orbits (’super-cold Jupiters’) are formed via pebble accretion followed by scattering, we predict that they belong to metal-rich stars, have eccentric orbits, and tend to have (∼ 80%) companions interior to their orbits.
通过卵石吸积形成行星的n体模拟。2。如何形成各种巨行星
目标行星的初始盘面条件与最终轨道和物理性质之间的联系还没有得到很好的理解。在本文中,我们数值研究了通过鹅卵石吸积形成的行星系统,并研究了圆盘性质(如质量,耗散时间尺度和金属丰度)对行星形成结果的影响。方法。考虑到新的行星-圆盘相互作用模型和II型迁移,我们改进了为论文I修改的n体代码SyMBA。我们采用“二α”盘模型来模拟标准盘湍流和磁碟风驱动的质量吸积的影响。结果。我们成功地再现了系外巨行星的半长轴、偏心率和行星质量的总体分布趋势。有两种类型的巨行星形成趋势,这取决于盘的耗散时间尺度是否与行星形成时间尺度相当。当行星形成的速度足够快时,巨行星就会完全成熟(木星质量或更高),并广泛分布在圆盘上。另一方面,当行星的形成受到圆盘耗散的限制时,圆盘通常会形成低质量的冷木星(CJs)。我们的模拟也很自然地解释了为什么热木星(HJs)往往是孤独的,以及观察到的偏心率-金属丰度趋势是如何产生的。低金属丰度盘倾向于在原位形成近圆形和共面HJs,这是因为行星形成速度比高金属丰度盘慢,因此在气体吸积之前原行星核心迁移显著。另一方面,高金属丰度圆盘在原位或通过偏心轨道的潮汐循环产生HJs。这两种路径通常都涉及动力不稳定性,因此高温射流往往具有更宽的偏心和倾角分布。当轨道非常宽的巨行星(“超冷木星”)通过鹅卵石吸积和散射形成时,我们预测它们属于富含金属的恒星,具有偏心轨道,并且在其轨道内部往往有(~ 80%)伴星。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review
The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review 地学天文-天文与天体物理
CiteScore
45.00
自引率
0.80%
发文量
7
期刊介绍: The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review is a journal that covers all areas of astronomy and astrophysics. It includes subjects related to other fields such as laboratory or particle physics, cosmic ray physics, studies in the solar system, astrobiology, instrumentation, and computational and statistical methods with specific astronomical applications. The frequency of review articles depends on the level of activity in different areas. The journal focuses on publishing review articles that are scientifically rigorous and easily comprehensible. These articles serve as a valuable resource for scientists, students, researchers, and lecturers who want to explore new or unfamiliar fields. The journal is abstracted and indexed in various databases including the Astrophysics Data System (ADS), BFI List, CNKI, CNPIEC, Current Contents/Physical, Chemical and Earth Sciences, Dimensions, EBSCO Academic Search, EI Compendex, Japanese Science and Technology, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信