{"title":"The Law School¿s Fair Image","authors":"Abner J. Mikva","doi":"10.2307/1600557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Law School did not have an image problem when I matriculated in 1948. That is because it didn't have much of an image one way or the other. It had struggled through the war years with reduced enrollment and a very nice dean named Wilber Katz (pronounced \"Kotz\"). He taught Corporate Management and Finance, had a deep concern about the miasma of the then-existing Illinois criminal procedure (and did something about it), and was very happy to pass off the deanship to one of the Young Turks who had joined the faculty during and after the war. It was quite a group of young bloods. Edward Levi, using two huge volumes of unindexed and home-grown materials, was teaching a course called \"Elements of the Law.\" None of us quite understood it, but were fascinated with both the course and him. He was Jekyll and Hyde: In class, he was master of the universe, with a needling sense of humor, and particularly ready to take on anyone who thought he knew all the answers. (I use the male gender advisedly; there were only three women in our class, and Levi was too chivalrous to trick them into his bag). Outside of class, he was meek and self-effacing, giving no one any premonitions of where he planned to go in his career. Walter Blum already was making a name for himself in the tax field. Harry Kalven, Jr., who had trouble getting his tenure piece written because he spent so much time with his students, and Bernard D. Meltzer, who had just come back from the Nuremberg War Crime Trials, rounded out the new kids on the faculty block. They had some peerless backstopping in the likes of Malcolm Sharp, who taught contracts and never heard a question or comment in class that wasn't \"interesting\" and worth pursuing; Charles 0. Gregory who taught torts and labor law, and never seemed to have a bad day; William Winslow Crosskey, who taught constitutional law in a way that fascinated his students, but didn't square with what the Supreme Court was saying about the Constitution; Sheldon Tefft, who taught property and who some of us believed had clerked for the judge who wrote the Rule in Shelley's Case; and Max Rheinstein, who taught comparative law to those who could wade through his marvelously","PeriodicalId":51436,"journal":{"name":"University of Chicago Law Review","volume":"24 1","pages":"259-264"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2003-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Chicago Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/1600557","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The Law School did not have an image problem when I matriculated in 1948. That is because it didn't have much of an image one way or the other. It had struggled through the war years with reduced enrollment and a very nice dean named Wilber Katz (pronounced "Kotz"). He taught Corporate Management and Finance, had a deep concern about the miasma of the then-existing Illinois criminal procedure (and did something about it), and was very happy to pass off the deanship to one of the Young Turks who had joined the faculty during and after the war. It was quite a group of young bloods. Edward Levi, using two huge volumes of unindexed and home-grown materials, was teaching a course called "Elements of the Law." None of us quite understood it, but were fascinated with both the course and him. He was Jekyll and Hyde: In class, he was master of the universe, with a needling sense of humor, and particularly ready to take on anyone who thought he knew all the answers. (I use the male gender advisedly; there were only three women in our class, and Levi was too chivalrous to trick them into his bag). Outside of class, he was meek and self-effacing, giving no one any premonitions of where he planned to go in his career. Walter Blum already was making a name for himself in the tax field. Harry Kalven, Jr., who had trouble getting his tenure piece written because he spent so much time with his students, and Bernard D. Meltzer, who had just come back from the Nuremberg War Crime Trials, rounded out the new kids on the faculty block. They had some peerless backstopping in the likes of Malcolm Sharp, who taught contracts and never heard a question or comment in class that wasn't "interesting" and worth pursuing; Charles 0. Gregory who taught torts and labor law, and never seemed to have a bad day; William Winslow Crosskey, who taught constitutional law in a way that fascinated his students, but didn't square with what the Supreme Court was saying about the Constitution; Sheldon Tefft, who taught property and who some of us believed had clerked for the judge who wrote the Rule in Shelley's Case; and Max Rheinstein, who taught comparative law to those who could wade through his marvelously
我1948年入学时,法学院还没有形象问题。这是因为它没有多少形象,不管怎样。在战争年代,学校招生人数减少,院长威尔伯·卡茨(Wilber Katz,发音为“Kotz”)非常和蔼可亲。他教授企业管理和金融,对当时存在的伊利诺伊州刑事诉讼程序的瘴气深感担忧(并对此采取了一些措施),并且非常高兴地将院长职位交给了一位在战争期间和战后加入该学院的青年土耳其人。这是一群很年轻的人。爱德华·利瓦伊(Edward Levi)正在教授一门名为“法律要素”(Elements of the Law)的课程,他使用了两大卷未编入索引的自制材料。我们都不太明白,但我们都被这门课和他迷住了。他是双重人格:在课堂上,他是宇宙的主宰,有着令人兴奋的幽默感,尤其乐于挑战任何认为他无所不知的人。(我特意用了男性;我们班只有三个女生,李维很有风度,不会把她们骗进他的包里。在课堂之外,他温顺而谦逊,没有给任何人任何预感他打算在他的职业生涯中走向何方。沃尔特·布鲁姆已经在税务领域出了名。小哈里·卡尔文(Harry Kalven, Jr.)和伯纳德·d·梅尔泽(Bernard D. Meltzer)——他花了太多时间和学生在一起,所以很难完成他的终身教职论文,他们是教职员工的新成员。伯纳德·d·梅尔泽刚刚从纽伦堡战犯审判中归来。他们有马尔科姆·夏普(Malcolm Sharp)等人的支持,他教授合同,在课堂上从来没有听到过一个不“有趣”、不值得探究的问题或评论;查尔斯·0。格列高利教授侵权行为法和劳动法,似乎从来没有过糟糕的一天;威廉·温斯洛·克罗斯基,他教授宪法的方式让他的学生着迷,但与最高法院对宪法的看法不一致;教授财产学的谢尔顿·特夫特,我们有些人认为他是撰写雪莱案规则的法官的书记员;还有马克斯·莱茵斯坦,他把比较法教授给那些能读懂他的著作的人
期刊介绍:
The University of Chicago Law Review is a quarterly journal of legal scholarship. Often cited in Supreme Court and other court opinions, as well as in other scholarly works, it is among the most influential journals in the field. Students have full responsibility for editing and publishing the Law Review; they also contribute original scholarship of their own. The Law Review"s editorial board selects all pieces for publication and, with the assistance of staff members, performs substantive and technical edits on each of these pieces prior to publication.