Inclusive learning strategies at university: the perspective of Spanish faculty members from different knowledge areas (Estrategias de aprendizaje inclusivo en la universidad: la perspectiva del profesorado español de distintas áreas de conocimiento)

IF 1.1 4区 教育学 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Anabel Moriña, Inmaculada Orozco
{"title":"Inclusive learning strategies at university: the perspective of Spanish faculty members from different knowledge areas (Estrategias de aprendizaje inclusivo en la universidad: la perspectiva del profesorado español de distintas áreas de conocimiento)","authors":"Anabel Moriña, Inmaculada Orozco","doi":"10.1080/11356405.2022.2031786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper explores the most effective methodological strategies used by inclusive faculty from different knowledge areas to ensure that all students learn and succeed in their courses. A qualitative study was carried out and interviews were held with 119 Spanish faculty members from arts and humanities, STEM, health sciences, social and legal sciences and education sciences. The results are presented by knowledge area, followed by an analysis of the differences and similarities between them. The findings reveal that, despite belonging to different disciplines, inclusive faculty members use similar methodological strategies that welcome all students and do not differentiate in their practice between students with and without disabilities. The findings also indicate that faculty use a variety of methodological strategies, with active and participatory ones being considered most effective. This study shows that the methodological strategies that are effective for students in general are also effective for those with disabilities.","PeriodicalId":51688,"journal":{"name":"Culture and Education","volume":"98 1","pages":"231 - 265"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Culture and Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/11356405.2022.2031786","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper explores the most effective methodological strategies used by inclusive faculty from different knowledge areas to ensure that all students learn and succeed in their courses. A qualitative study was carried out and interviews were held with 119 Spanish faculty members from arts and humanities, STEM, health sciences, social and legal sciences and education sciences. The results are presented by knowledge area, followed by an analysis of the differences and similarities between them. The findings reveal that, despite belonging to different disciplines, inclusive faculty members use similar methodological strategies that welcome all students and do not differentiate in their practice between students with and without disabilities. The findings also indicate that faculty use a variety of methodological strategies, with active and participatory ones being considered most effective. This study shows that the methodological strategies that are effective for students in general are also effective for those with disabilities.
大学的包容性学习策略:来自不同知识领域的西班牙教师的视角(大学的包容性学习策略:来自不同知识领域的西班牙教师的视角)
本文探讨了来自不同知识领域的包容性教师使用的最有效的方法策略,以确保所有学生在课程中学习并取得成功。进行了一项定性研究,并对来自艺术和人文学科、STEM、卫生科学、社会和法律科学以及教育科学的119名西班牙教师进行了访谈。根据知识领域给出了结果,并分析了它们之间的异同。研究结果表明,尽管属于不同的学科,包容性教师使用类似的方法策略,欢迎所有学生,并且在实践中不区分有残疾和没有残疾的学生。调查结果还表明,教师使用各种方法策略,积极和参与式被认为是最有效的。这项研究表明,对一般学生有效的方法策略对残疾学生也有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Culture and Education
Culture and Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
41
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信