Free Will and Decision Making in Aesthetic and Moral Judgments.

IF 0.1 4区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY
Acta Philosophica Pub Date : 2008-01-01 DOI:10.1400/96699
F. Tempia
{"title":"Free Will and Decision Making in Aesthetic and Moral Judgments.","authors":"F. Tempia","doi":"10.1400/96699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Before simple voluntary movements, the activation of a specific region of the cerebral cortex precedes the conscious intention to move. This is currently considered as a demonstration that the decision to act is not free, but that the brain decides and thereafter generates the illusion of the will. Besides other criticisms, this type of movement is known to be mostly automatic. More complex decisions like aesthetic or moral judgments are a better paradigm to address the problem of the neural correlates for human choices and the freedom of the will. Aesthetic judgments are correlated with an activation of cerebral areas, which are connected to rational decision-making and are also involved also in other kinds of evaluations. Moreover, the timing of cortical activation shows that aesthetic judgment requires explicit and intentional reasoning. Moral judgments are correlated with the activation of cerebral areas, in which specific rational and motivational/emotional elements are processed. The subject performing such an evaluation is the conscious self, who proceeds without a predetermined time limit, until he finds a satisfactory decision. The conscious and explicit nature of the evaluation suggests that the final decision cannot be mechanistically determined by the physical laws governing brain and body function.","PeriodicalId":41562,"journal":{"name":"Acta Philosophica","volume":"138 1","pages":"1000-1018"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2008-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Philosophica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1400/96699","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Before simple voluntary movements, the activation of a specific region of the cerebral cortex precedes the conscious intention to move. This is currently considered as a demonstration that the decision to act is not free, but that the brain decides and thereafter generates the illusion of the will. Besides other criticisms, this type of movement is known to be mostly automatic. More complex decisions like aesthetic or moral judgments are a better paradigm to address the problem of the neural correlates for human choices and the freedom of the will. Aesthetic judgments are correlated with an activation of cerebral areas, which are connected to rational decision-making and are also involved also in other kinds of evaluations. Moreover, the timing of cortical activation shows that aesthetic judgment requires explicit and intentional reasoning. Moral judgments are correlated with the activation of cerebral areas, in which specific rational and motivational/emotional elements are processed. The subject performing such an evaluation is the conscious self, who proceeds without a predetermined time limit, until he finds a satisfactory decision. The conscious and explicit nature of the evaluation suggests that the final decision cannot be mechanistically determined by the physical laws governing brain and body function.
审美与道德判断中的自由意志与决策。
在简单的自主运动之前,大脑皮层的一个特定区域的激活先于有意识的运动意图。目前,这被认为是一个证明,行动的决定不是自由的,而是大脑决定的,然后产生了意志的幻觉。除了其他的批评,这种类型的运动被认为是自动的。更复杂的决策,如审美或道德判断,是解决人类选择和意志自由的神经关联问题的更好范例。审美判断与大脑区域的激活有关,大脑区域与理性决策有关,也与其他类型的评估有关。此外,皮层激活的时间表明,审美判断需要明确和有意的推理。道德判断与大脑区域的激活有关,在该区域中处理特定的理性和动机/情感元素。进行这种评估的主体是有意识的自我,他没有预先确定的时间限制,直到他找到一个满意的决定。评估的有意识和明确的性质表明,最终的决定不能由控制大脑和身体功能的物理定律机械地决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Philosophica
Acta Philosophica PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信