A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF GLOBAL RESEARCH OUTPUTS ON SEAFOOD AND ANTIBIOTICS (1999 – 2019)

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
O. Odeyemi, D. Stratev, J. Oko, Nurudeen Salisu
{"title":"A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF GLOBAL RESEARCH OUTPUTS ON SEAFOOD AND ANTIBIOTICS (1999 – 2019)","authors":"O. Odeyemi, D. Stratev, J. Oko, Nurudeen Salisu","doi":"10.31926/but.fwiafe.2021.14.63.1.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study is aimed at investigating the global trend in research activities involving seafood and antibiotics based on published research output articles. Peer reviewed articles published in the last two decades involving seafood and antibiotics were searched on the Scopus database using the search words “seafood” and “antibiotics’’. The retrieved data were then analyzed based on the total research outputs, countries and affiliation of authors, sources of funding, keywords used by the authors, citations and collaborations using both add-on analytical tool, Microsoft Excel and VOS viewer for data visualization. A total of 447 research outputs by 710 authors affiliated with 1173 institutions from 74 countries using 1051 keywords were obtained. Original research articles accounted for the highest percentage (87.7%) and published across 166 different peer-reviewed journals. Most of the original research articles were published in the International Journal of Food Microbiology 27(16.3%). Khan, A. A. from the Division of Microbiology; National Centre for Toxicological Research, United States, was the most productive author with 10 (2.2%) publications while the National Natural Science Foundation of China was the highest funding institution with 22 (4.9%) and the United States of America was the most productive with 91 (20.4%) research outputs followed by China with 70 (15.7%) research outputs. Over the last two decades (1999 – 2019), there has been an exponential (r2=0.91) increase in seafood and antibiotics related research activities. The majority of these research activities were from America, Asia and Europe. There is need for international scientific collaboration between the leading researchers and researchers from developing countries in seafood research to help mitigate food loss, enhance food security, and increase the productivity of early career researchers.","PeriodicalId":38505,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Brasov, Series II: Forestry, Wood Industry, Agricultural Food Engineering","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Brasov, Series II: Forestry, Wood Industry, Agricultural Food Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31926/but.fwiafe.2021.14.63.1.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study is aimed at investigating the global trend in research activities involving seafood and antibiotics based on published research output articles. Peer reviewed articles published in the last two decades involving seafood and antibiotics were searched on the Scopus database using the search words “seafood” and “antibiotics’’. The retrieved data were then analyzed based on the total research outputs, countries and affiliation of authors, sources of funding, keywords used by the authors, citations and collaborations using both add-on analytical tool, Microsoft Excel and VOS viewer for data visualization. A total of 447 research outputs by 710 authors affiliated with 1173 institutions from 74 countries using 1051 keywords were obtained. Original research articles accounted for the highest percentage (87.7%) and published across 166 different peer-reviewed journals. Most of the original research articles were published in the International Journal of Food Microbiology 27(16.3%). Khan, A. A. from the Division of Microbiology; National Centre for Toxicological Research, United States, was the most productive author with 10 (2.2%) publications while the National Natural Science Foundation of China was the highest funding institution with 22 (4.9%) and the United States of America was the most productive with 91 (20.4%) research outputs followed by China with 70 (15.7%) research outputs. Over the last two decades (1999 – 2019), there has been an exponential (r2=0.91) increase in seafood and antibiotics related research activities. The majority of these research activities were from America, Asia and Europe. There is need for international scientific collaboration between the leading researchers and researchers from developing countries in seafood research to help mitigate food loss, enhance food security, and increase the productivity of early career researchers.
1999 - 2019年全球海产品和抗生素研究成果的文献计量分析
本研究旨在根据已发表的研究成果文章,调查涉及海鲜和抗生素的研究活动的全球趋势。在Scopus数据库中搜索关键词“海鲜”和“抗生素”,检索过去20年发表的涉及海鲜和抗生素的同行评议文章。然后,检索到的数据根据研究总产出、作者所在国家和所属机构、资金来源、作者使用的关键词、引用和合作情况进行分析,使用附加分析工具Microsoft Excel和VOS查看器进行数据可视化。共获得74个国家1173个机构710位作者、1051个关键词的447篇研究成果。原创研究论文所占比例最高(87.7%),发表在166种不同的同行评审期刊上。大部分原创研究论文发表在International Journal of Food Microbiology(27)上(16.3%)。Khan, a.a.,微生物学系;美国国家毒理学研究中心发表了10篇(2.2%)论文,中国国家自然科学基金委员会发表了22篇(4.9%)论文,美国发表了91篇(20.4%)论文,中国发表了70篇(15.7%)论文。在过去的二十年(1999 - 2019)中,海产品和抗生素相关研究活动呈指数增长(r2=0.91)。这些研究活动大多来自美洲、亚洲和欧洲。有必要在主要的科学家和来自发展中国家的科学家之间开展海鲜研究方面的国际科学合作,以帮助减轻粮食损失,加强粮食安全,并提高早期职业科学家的生产力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信