Diagnosis of malaria using thick bloodsmears: definition and evaluation of a faster protocol with improved readability

M. Thellier, A. Datry, O. Cissé, C. San, S. Biligui, O. Silvie, M. Daniš
{"title":"Diagnosis of malaria using thick bloodsmears: definition and evaluation of a faster protocol with improved readability","authors":"M. Thellier, A. Datry, O. Cissé, C. San, S. Biligui, O. Silvie, M. Daniš","doi":"10.1179/000349802125000691","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The value of some inexpensive modifications to the standard method of preparing thick bloodsmears, involving rapid drying, an isotonic fixative and a haemolysing solution containing saponin, was evaluated. The drying, haemolysing, fixing and staining steps, together called the fast-thick-smear method (FTS), can be completed in <10min. The FTS and a more classical thick-smear method (CTS) were both used on each of 1185 samples of venous blood samples from 1034 cases of suspected malaria (all international travellers returning to France). The results indicated that there was no statistically significant differences between the two methods in terms of their sensitivity, specificity or predictive values for parasite detection. However, estimates of the intensities of the Plasmodium falciparum infections observed, based on counts of trophozoites against 200 leucocytes, were markedly higher (37.8% higher overall) with the FTS than with the CTS (P < 0.0001). Moreover, the concordance between results obtained by inexperienced and experienced microscopists was excellent when the FTS was used, with a kappa value of 0.96 (95% confidence interval=0.93-0.98).","PeriodicalId":8038,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Tropical Medicine & Parasitology","volume":"16 1","pages":"115 - 124"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Tropical Medicine & Parasitology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1179/000349802125000691","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Abstract The value of some inexpensive modifications to the standard method of preparing thick bloodsmears, involving rapid drying, an isotonic fixative and a haemolysing solution containing saponin, was evaluated. The drying, haemolysing, fixing and staining steps, together called the fast-thick-smear method (FTS), can be completed in <10min. The FTS and a more classical thick-smear method (CTS) were both used on each of 1185 samples of venous blood samples from 1034 cases of suspected malaria (all international travellers returning to France). The results indicated that there was no statistically significant differences between the two methods in terms of their sensitivity, specificity or predictive values for parasite detection. However, estimates of the intensities of the Plasmodium falciparum infections observed, based on counts of trophozoites against 200 leucocytes, were markedly higher (37.8% higher overall) with the FTS than with the CTS (P < 0.0001). Moreover, the concordance between results obtained by inexperienced and experienced microscopists was excellent when the FTS was used, with a kappa value of 0.96 (95% confidence interval=0.93-0.98).
使用黏稠血涂片诊断疟疾:定义和评价具有改进可读性的更快方案
摘要:本文评价了几种廉价的稠血片制备方法的价值,包括快速干燥、等渗固定剂和含皂苷的溶血溶液。干燥、溶血、固定和染色步骤统称为快速厚涂片法(FTS),可在<10min内完成。对来自1034例疑似疟疾病例(所有返回法国的国际旅行者)的1185份静脉血样本均使用了FTS和更经典的厚涂片法。结果表明,两种方法在检测寄生虫的敏感性、特异性和预测值方面均无统计学差异。然而,根据对200个白细胞的滋养体计数,观察到的恶性疟原虫感染强度估计,FTS组明显高于CTS组(总体高37.8%)(P < 0.0001)。此外,当使用FTS时,无经验和有经验的显微镜所获得的结果之间的一致性非常好,kappa值为0.96(95%置信区间=0.93-0.98)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信