Capitalism, Crisis, and Contention: Race, Racism, and Resistance

IF 0.5 Q4 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
L. Langman
{"title":"Capitalism, Crisis, and Contention: Race, Racism, and Resistance","authors":"L. Langman","doi":"10.1163/15691497-12341588","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nFor Marx, the alienation of wage labor and inherent crisis tendencies of capital would foster collective grievances and support for communist movements promising revolution and the abolition of private property, creating a society wherein “the free development of each is the condition for the free development of all.” But a combination of material factors, the rise of the welfare state, increased wages, and later consumerism as well as ideologies such as religion and/or nationalism, thwarted revolutionary fervor in industrial societies. Nevertheless, Marxist theory provides a number of important insights that help us understand contemporary social mobilizations beginning with noting how historical legacies, materials conditions, class interests, and episodic crises dispose many movements, even those that take place on cultural terrains in public spheres and spaces while political economic/historical factors may not be evident. This can clearly be shown by understanding the nature of racism and the massive protests following the murder of George Floyd. The roots of racism, qua white ‘superiority’ were rooted in the colonial era in which the settlers enslaved Africans and forcibly displaced the native populations for clear economic gains. This was ideologically ‘legitimated’ by the dehumanization of racialized Others, it also provided ‘superior’ status and identity to Christian Caucasians. Moreover, such ideologies were sustained through violence, whether armed plantation owners, slave catchers, militias, and later police. For a variety of reasons, slavery ended but racism endures to this very day. But that said, between the growing economic and educational status of Africans Americans and the more progressive cosmopolitan/inclusive values and practices of the young, racism, for many, has waned. But police violence has not. In the face of growing inequality, the pandemic crisis that led to an economic crisis, especially onerous for the young and peoples of color, the murder of George Floyd, going viral, indicated how a number of the crises of neoliberal transnational capitalism migrated to the culture and led to massive protests and resistance against racism and police brutality.","PeriodicalId":43666,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on Global Development and Technology","volume":"2 1","pages":"151-167"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives on Global Development and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15691497-12341588","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For Marx, the alienation of wage labor and inherent crisis tendencies of capital would foster collective grievances and support for communist movements promising revolution and the abolition of private property, creating a society wherein “the free development of each is the condition for the free development of all.” But a combination of material factors, the rise of the welfare state, increased wages, and later consumerism as well as ideologies such as religion and/or nationalism, thwarted revolutionary fervor in industrial societies. Nevertheless, Marxist theory provides a number of important insights that help us understand contemporary social mobilizations beginning with noting how historical legacies, materials conditions, class interests, and episodic crises dispose many movements, even those that take place on cultural terrains in public spheres and spaces while political economic/historical factors may not be evident. This can clearly be shown by understanding the nature of racism and the massive protests following the murder of George Floyd. The roots of racism, qua white ‘superiority’ were rooted in the colonial era in which the settlers enslaved Africans and forcibly displaced the native populations for clear economic gains. This was ideologically ‘legitimated’ by the dehumanization of racialized Others, it also provided ‘superior’ status and identity to Christian Caucasians. Moreover, such ideologies were sustained through violence, whether armed plantation owners, slave catchers, militias, and later police. For a variety of reasons, slavery ended but racism endures to this very day. But that said, between the growing economic and educational status of Africans Americans and the more progressive cosmopolitan/inclusive values and practices of the young, racism, for many, has waned. But police violence has not. In the face of growing inequality, the pandemic crisis that led to an economic crisis, especially onerous for the young and peoples of color, the murder of George Floyd, going viral, indicated how a number of the crises of neoliberal transnational capitalism migrated to the culture and led to massive protests and resistance against racism and police brutality.
资本主义、危机和争论:种族、种族主义和抵抗
对马克思来说,雇佣劳动的异化和资本固有的危机倾向会助长集体的不满和对共产主义运动的支持,这些运动承诺革命和废除私有财产,创造一个“每个人的自由发展是所有人自由发展的条件”的社会。但是物质因素的结合,福利国家的兴起,工资的增加,以及后来的消费主义以及宗教和/或民族主义等意识形态,挫败了工业社会的革命热情。然而,马克思主义理论提供了许多重要的见解,帮助我们理解当代社会动员,首先注意到历史遗产、物质条件、阶级利益和偶发危机如何处置许多运动,甚至是那些发生在公共领域和空间的文化领域,而政治、经济/历史因素可能并不明显的运动。通过理解种族主义的本质和乔治·弗洛伊德被谋杀后的大规模抗议活动,可以清楚地表明这一点。种族主义的根源,即白人的“优越感”,植根于殖民时代,当时殖民者为了明显的经济利益而奴役非洲人,强迫当地人口流离失所。这在意识形态上是“合法的”,因为种族化的“他者”的非人性化,它也为基督教高加索人提供了“优越”的地位和身份。此外,这种意识形态通过暴力得以维持,无论是武装种植园主、奴隶捕手、民兵,还是后来的警察。由于种种原因,奴隶制结束了,但种族主义一直延续至今。但话虽如此,在非裔美国人不断提高的经济和教育地位以及年轻人更进步的世界主义/包容性价值观和做法之间,对许多人来说,种族主义已经减弱。但警察暴力却没有。面对日益严重的不平等,流行病危机导致经济危机,对年轻人和有色人种来说尤其沉重,乔治·弗洛伊德被谋杀事件迅速传播,表明新自由主义跨国资本主义的一些危机如何转移到文化中,并导致大规模抗议和抵制种族主义和警察暴行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Perspectives on Global Development and Technology (PGDT) is a peer-reviewed journal for the discussion of current social sciences research on diverse socio-economic development issues that reflect the opportunities and threats brought about by the world order shift from bipolar to global, the present economic liberalization that constricts development options, and the new enabling technologies of the Information Age. A founding principle of PGDT is that all people are entitled to scientific and technological knowledge to promote human development. PGDT is the international forum where the questions associated with this endeavour are thoroughly examinated and clearly communicated.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信