Natalia Tanojo, I. Citrashanty, B. Utomo, Y. Listiawan, Evy Ervianti, Damayanti, Sawitri, Acta Dermatovenerologica, Adriatica Acta, D. Apa
{"title":"Oral postbiotics derived from Lactobacillus sp. in treatment of atopic dermatitis: a meta-analysis.","authors":"Natalia Tanojo, I. Citrashanty, B. Utomo, Y. Listiawan, Evy Ervianti, Damayanti, Sawitri, Acta Dermatovenerologica, Adriatica Acta, D. Apa","doi":"10.15570/actaapa.2023.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\nThe use of postbiotics, which are defined as dead microorganisms and/or their components that provide health benefits to the target host, has been shown to reduce the severity of atopic dermatitis (AD) in several studies.\n\n\nMETHODS\nA systematic literature review was conducted in Pubmed, the Cochrane Library, Science Direct, Clinicaltrials.gov, and Google Scholar, covering the period from January 2012 to July 2022 in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline. AD patients of all ages that received oral postbiotics or placebo as treatment were the focus of the study. The main study outcome was the scoring of atopic dermatitis (SCORAD) and other measures, such as extension area, disease intensity, and adverse events. The final data were pooled using a fixed-effect model.\n\n\nRESULTS\nA meta-analysis of three studies found that, compared to placebo, SCORAD was lower in subjects that were given oral postbiotics from Lactobacillus sp. (mean difference: -2.90, 95% confidence interval [CI; -4.21, -1.59], p < 0.00001). From the comparison of two studies, the differences in disease extension (mean difference: -2.40, 95% CI [-7.67, 2.81], p = 0.37) and intensity (mean difference: -0.27, 95% CI [-0.84, 0.30], p = 0.36) were not significant.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nThe administration of oral postbiotics from Lactobacillus sp. has the potential to alleviate the severity of AD as indicated by a reduction in SCORAD scores.","PeriodicalId":45914,"journal":{"name":"Acta Dermatovenerologica Alpina Pannonica et Adriatica","volume":"32 1","pages":"41-47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Dermatovenerologica Alpina Pannonica et Adriatica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15570/actaapa.2023.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
The use of postbiotics, which are defined as dead microorganisms and/or their components that provide health benefits to the target host, has been shown to reduce the severity of atopic dermatitis (AD) in several studies.
METHODS
A systematic literature review was conducted in Pubmed, the Cochrane Library, Science Direct, Clinicaltrials.gov, and Google Scholar, covering the period from January 2012 to July 2022 in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline. AD patients of all ages that received oral postbiotics or placebo as treatment were the focus of the study. The main study outcome was the scoring of atopic dermatitis (SCORAD) and other measures, such as extension area, disease intensity, and adverse events. The final data were pooled using a fixed-effect model.
RESULTS
A meta-analysis of three studies found that, compared to placebo, SCORAD was lower in subjects that were given oral postbiotics from Lactobacillus sp. (mean difference: -2.90, 95% confidence interval [CI; -4.21, -1.59], p < 0.00001). From the comparison of two studies, the differences in disease extension (mean difference: -2.40, 95% CI [-7.67, 2.81], p = 0.37) and intensity (mean difference: -0.27, 95% CI [-0.84, 0.30], p = 0.36) were not significant.
CONCLUSIONS
The administration of oral postbiotics from Lactobacillus sp. has the potential to alleviate the severity of AD as indicated by a reduction in SCORAD scores.
在一些研究中,后生物制剂被定义为为目标宿主提供健康益处的死亡微生物和/或其成分,已被证明可以降低特应性皮炎(AD)的严重程度。方法根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,在Pubmed、Cochrane图书馆、Science Direct、Clinicaltrials.gov和Google Scholar上进行系统文献综述,涵盖2012年1月至2022年7月。接受口服后生物制剂或安慰剂治疗的所有年龄的AD患者是研究的重点。主要研究结果为特应性皮炎评分(SCORAD)和其他指标,如扩展面积、疾病强度和不良事件。最后的数据是用固定效应模型汇总的。结果:三项研究的sa荟萃分析发现,与安慰剂相比,口服乳杆菌后生物制剂的受试者的SCORAD较低(平均差异:-2.90,95%可信区间[CI;-4.21, -1.59], p < 0.00001)。两项研究比较,疾病扩展(平均差异:-2.40,95% CI [-7.67, 2.81], p = 0.37)和强度(平均差异:-0.27,95% CI [-0.84, 0.30], p = 0.36)差异无统计学意义。结论口服乳酸杆菌后生制剂有可能减轻AD的严重程度,如SCORAD评分的降低所示。