Quality of the pharmacotherapeutic recommendations for the integrated care procedures in Andalusia

Rosa María Muñoz Corte , Raúl García Estepa , Bernardo Santos Ramos , Francisco Javier Bautista Paloma
{"title":"Quality of the pharmacotherapeutic recommendations for the integrated care procedures in Andalusia","authors":"Rosa María Muñoz Corte ,&nbsp;Raúl García Estepa ,&nbsp;Bernardo Santos Ramos ,&nbsp;Francisco Javier Bautista Paloma","doi":"10.1016/S2173-5085(09)70092-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To evaluate the quality of the pharmacotherapeutic recommendations included in the Integrated Care Processes (PAIs regarding its initials in Spanish) of the Andalusian Ministry of Health, published up to March 2008, through the design and validation of a tool.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The assessment tool was designed based on similar instruments, specifically the AGREE. Other criteria included were taken from various literature sources or were devised by ourselves. The tool was validated prior to being used. After applying it to all the PAIs, we examined the degree of compliance with these pharmacotherapeutical criteria, both as a whole and by PAIs subgroups.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The developed tool is a questionnaire of 20 items, divided into 4 sections. The first section consists of the essential criteria, and the rest make reference to more specific, non essential criteria: definition of the level of evidence, thoroughness of information and definition of indicators. It was found that 4 of the 60 PAIs do not contain any type of therapeutic recommendation. No PAI fulfils all the items listed in the tool, however, 70 % of them fulfil the essential quality criteria established.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>There is a great variability in the content of pharmacotherapeutical recommendations for each PAI. Once the validity of the tool has been proved, it could be used to assess the quality of the therapeutic recommendations in clinical practice guidelines.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100521,"journal":{"name":"Farmacia Hospitalaria (English Edition)","volume":"33 5","pages":"Pages 269-280"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S2173-5085(09)70092-9","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Farmacia Hospitalaria (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173508509700929","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate the quality of the pharmacotherapeutic recommendations included in the Integrated Care Processes (PAIs regarding its initials in Spanish) of the Andalusian Ministry of Health, published up to March 2008, through the design and validation of a tool.

Methods

The assessment tool was designed based on similar instruments, specifically the AGREE. Other criteria included were taken from various literature sources or were devised by ourselves. The tool was validated prior to being used. After applying it to all the PAIs, we examined the degree of compliance with these pharmacotherapeutical criteria, both as a whole and by PAIs subgroups.

Results

The developed tool is a questionnaire of 20 items, divided into 4 sections. The first section consists of the essential criteria, and the rest make reference to more specific, non essential criteria: definition of the level of evidence, thoroughness of information and definition of indicators. It was found that 4 of the 60 PAIs do not contain any type of therapeutic recommendation. No PAI fulfils all the items listed in the tool, however, 70 % of them fulfil the essential quality criteria established.

Conclusions

There is a great variability in the content of pharmacotherapeutical recommendations for each PAI. Once the validity of the tool has been proved, it could be used to assess the quality of the therapeutic recommendations in clinical practice guidelines.

在安达卢西亚综合护理程序的药物治疗建议的质量
目的通过设计和验证一种工具,评估安达卢西亚卫生部截至2008年3月发布的综合护理流程(PAIs)中包含的药物治疗建议的质量。方法参照同类评估工具,特别是AGREE,设计评估工具。包括的其他标准取自各种文献来源或由我们自己设计。该工具在使用前进行了验证。在将其应用于所有PAIs后,我们检查了整体和PAIs亚组对这些药物治疗标准的依从程度。结果编制的问卷共20个项目,分为4个部分。第一部分包括基本标准,其余部分涉及更具体的非基本标准:证据水平的定义、信息的彻底性和指标的定义。结果发现,60个pai中有4个不包含任何类型的治疗建议。没有PAI能够满足工具中列出的所有项目,但是,其中70%能够满足所建立的基本质量标准。结论各PAI推荐的药物治疗内容存在较大差异。一旦该工具的有效性得到证实,它就可以用于评估临床实践指南中治疗建议的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信