A New Witness to the Fayyūmic Version of First Corinthians (P.MorganLib. 265). Part II: Notes on its Text-Critical Value, with an Edition of the Coptic Text

IF 0.5 2区哲学 0 RELIGION

New Testament Studies Pub Date : 2022-03-04 DOI:10.1017/S0028688521000357

I. Miroshnikov

引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract This is the second part of a two-part article focused on a fragmentary parchment codex, whose three extant leaves, designated in Leo Depuydt's catalogue as P.MorganLib. 265, are housed at the Morgan Library & Museum in New York. These fragments bear witness to 1 Cor 2.12–3.18; 7.16–30; 15.3–30 in the ‘classical’ variety of Fayyūmic Coptic (dialect F5). The first part of this article was published in NTS 68 (2022) 89–104. In the second part, I discuss the witnesses to the Fayyūmic version (fa) of First Corinthians, the relationship between fa and the Bohairic version (bo), and the text-critical value of the variant readings attested in P.MorganLib. 265. This is followed by the editio princeps of the manuscript, notes on the Coptic text, an English translation and images.

查看原文本刊更多论文

《哥林多前书》Fayyūmic版本的新见证(P.MorganLib)。265)。第二部分:对其文本关键价值的注释，与科普特文本的一个版本

这是一个两部分文章的第二部分集中在一个碎片羊皮纸手抄本，其三个现存的叶子，指定在Leo Depuydt的目录P.MorganLib。265件，收藏于纽约的摩根图书馆和博物馆。这些片段见证了哥林多前书2:12 - 3.18;7.16 -30;15.3-30的“古典”变种Fayyūmic科普特语(方言F5)。本文的第一部分发表于NTS 68(2022) 89-104。在第二部分中，我讨论了《哥林多前书》Fayyūmic版本(fa)的见证人，fa与波哈伊尔版本(bo)的关系，以及P.MorganLib中证实的变体阅读的文本批判价值。265. 接下来是手稿的编辑原则，对科普特文本的注释，英语翻译和图像。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

New Testament Studies RELIGION-

CiteScore

0.80

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： New Testament Studies is an international peer-reviewed periodical whose contributors include the leading New Testament scholars writing in the world today. The journal publishes original articles and short studies in English, French and German on a wide range of issues pertaining to the origins, history, context and theology of the New Testament and early Christianity. All contributions represent research at the cutting edge of the discipline, which has developed a wide range of methods. The journal welcomes submissions employing any such methods in recent years. The periodical embraces exegetical, historical, literary-critical, sociological, theological and other approaches to the New Testament, including studies in its history of interpretation and effects.