L. Mirhadyan, H. Arasteh, H. Zeinabadi, H. Abbasian
{"title":"Open Innovation Management Model in Medical Sciences' Education:A Case Study of Guilan University of Medical Sciences","authors":"L. Mirhadyan, H. Arasteh, H. Zeinabadi, H. Abbasian","doi":"10.52547/rme.13.3.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"©2021Guilan University of Medical Sciences ABSTACT Introduction: Relying only on traditional innovations with closed borders is not enough for educating medical sciences. Open innovation requires new management methods. The purpose of this study was to provide a model for evaluating the status of open innovation management in medical education at Guilan University of Medical Sciences. Methods: This mixed research was first conducted in a qualitative stage with semistructured interviews with the managers of Guilan University of Medical Sciences by purposive sampling method until the theoretical saturation was reached. Then, by analyzing the content of the interviews, the components of open innovation management were identified and based on this, a 35-item questionnaire was designed which, after ensuring validity and reliability, was completed by 185 faculty members to determine the status of open innovation management in medical education in Guilan University of Medical Sciences. The Findings were analyzed by SPSS and one-sample t-test. Result: In the qualitative stage of the research, six components including knowledge management, strategic management, change management in organizational structure and culture, management of environmental factors, networking and management of intellectual property laws were organized and an open innovation management model in medical education was designed. Quantitative findings of the study showed that all components except strategic management and management of environmental factors with the mean and standard deviation (3.1±0.7) and (3.06± 0.9) respectively were higher than average (3) but the other components were below the average. Conclusion: Open innovation management in medical sciences education was not in good situation in the most of identified components, which requires the serious attention of the managers of Guilan University of Medical Sciences to the management of educational innovations based on the open model.","PeriodicalId":75518,"journal":{"name":"Annual Conference on Research in Medical Education. Conference on Research in Medical Education","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Conference on Research in Medical Education. Conference on Research in Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52547/rme.13.3.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
医学教育开放式创新管理模式——以桂兰医科大学为例
摘要导读:医学教育仅靠封闭的传统创新是不够的。开放式创新需要新的管理方法。摘要本研究旨在提供一个评估桂兰医科大学医学教育开放式创新管理现状的模型。方法:本混合研究首先在定性阶段进行,采用目的抽样法对贵兰医科大学管理人员进行半结构化访谈,直至理论饱和。然后,通过对访谈内容的分析,确定开放式创新管理的构成要素,并在此基础上设计了一份35题的问卷,在保证效度和信度的前提下,由185名教师完成问卷,以确定桂兰医科大学开放式创新管理在医学教育中的现状。采用SPSS统计软件和单样本t检验对结果进行分析。结果:在研究的定性阶段,组织了知识管理、战略管理、组织结构与文化变革管理、环境因素管理、网络管理和知识产权法管理六个组成部分,设计了医学教育开放式创新管理模式。定量研究结果表明,除战略管理和环境因素管理外,各成分的均值和标准差分别为(3.1±0.7)和(3.06±0.9)高于平均值(3),其余成分均低于平均值(3)。结论:医学教育开放式创新管理在大多数已识别的组成部分中情况不佳,需要桂兰医科大学管理者对基于开放式模式的教育创新管理给予高度重视。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。