Generation Of Reactive Species By Plasma Needle In Different Liquids

Q1 Medicine
Inés Hamouda , Alix Gouhier , Cédric Labay , Maria-Pau Ginebra , Cristina Canal
{"title":"Generation Of Reactive Species By Plasma Needle In Different Liquids","authors":"Inés Hamouda ,&nbsp;Alix Gouhier ,&nbsp;Cédric Labay ,&nbsp;Maria-Pau Ginebra ,&nbsp;Cristina Canal","doi":"10.1016/j.cpme.2017.12.054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Plasma activated media (PAM) is produced by exposing liquids to cold atmospheric plasmas [1,2]. PAM has gained increasing attention due to its capacity to kill cancer cells<span> as effectively as direct treatment of cells in culture by cold plasmas.</span></p><p>In previous works [3] we could show the selectivity of an atmospheric pressure plasma needle on osteosarcoma cell lines versus healthy bone cells. The cytotoxicity of the direct plasma treatment on cells was comparable to treatment with PAM, wherein in this case the liquid selected was cell culture medium.</p><p>The rationale beyond employing PAM lies in being able to avoid the effects of electrical field, or UV/VIS radiation present in plasmas, and its biological effects seem to lay in the reactive oxygen species<span> (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) generated in the aqueous state. The concentration of ROS and RNS in the PAM is directly related to its effectiveness in killing cancer cells. It is our interest to evaluate the different parameters influencing the generation of ROS and RNS.</span></p><p>In this work different liquid media (different cell culture media, aqueous solutions such as water or ringer’s saline, etc.) are compared, and the production of ROS and RNS is quantified in different conditions (volume of liquid, treatment times, distance to the nozzle). The stability of the mentioned species is evaluated with time.<span><figure><span><img><ol><li><span>Download : <span>Download high-res image (106KB)</span></span></li><li><span>Download : <span>Download full-size image</span></span></li></ol></span></figure></span></p><p>Figure 1. Production of H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> and NO<sub>2</sub><sup>-</sup> by APPJ treatment on different cell culture medium (a) McCoy and (b) AdvDMEM.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46325,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Plasma Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cpme.2017.12.054","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Plasma Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212816617300793","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Plasma activated media (PAM) is produced by exposing liquids to cold atmospheric plasmas [1,2]. PAM has gained increasing attention due to its capacity to kill cancer cells as effectively as direct treatment of cells in culture by cold plasmas.

In previous works [3] we could show the selectivity of an atmospheric pressure plasma needle on osteosarcoma cell lines versus healthy bone cells. The cytotoxicity of the direct plasma treatment on cells was comparable to treatment with PAM, wherein in this case the liquid selected was cell culture medium.

The rationale beyond employing PAM lies in being able to avoid the effects of electrical field, or UV/VIS radiation present in plasmas, and its biological effects seem to lay in the reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) generated in the aqueous state. The concentration of ROS and RNS in the PAM is directly related to its effectiveness in killing cancer cells. It is our interest to evaluate the different parameters influencing the generation of ROS and RNS.

In this work different liquid media (different cell culture media, aqueous solutions such as water or ringer’s saline, etc.) are compared, and the production of ROS and RNS is quantified in different conditions (volume of liquid, treatment times, distance to the nozzle). The stability of the mentioned species is evaluated with time.

  1. Download : Download high-res image (106KB)
  2. Download : Download full-size image

Figure 1. Production of H2O2 and NO2- by APPJ treatment on different cell culture medium (a) McCoy and (b) AdvDMEM.

血浆针在不同液体中产生反应物质
等离子体活化介质(PAM)是通过将液体暴露在低温大气等离子体中产生的[1,2]。由于PAM具有与冷等离子体直接治疗培养细胞一样有效的杀死癌细胞的能力,因此受到越来越多的关注。在之前的工作[3]中,我们可以证明常压血浆针对骨肉瘤细胞系与健康骨细胞的选择性。直接等离子体处理细胞的细胞毒性与PAM处理相当,在这种情况下,选择的液体是细胞培养基。除了使用PAM的理由,还在于能够避免等离子体中存在的电场或UV/VIS辐射的影响,其生物效应似乎在于在水溶液中产生的活性氧(ROS)和活性氮(RNS)。PAM中ROS和RNS的浓度直接关系到其杀伤癌细胞的有效性。我们感兴趣的是评估影响ROS和RNS产生的不同参数。在这项工作中,比较了不同的液体培养基(不同的细胞培养基,水或林格盐水等水溶液),并定量了不同条件(液体体积,处理次数,与喷嘴的距离)下ROS和RNS的产生。随着时间的推移,对所述物种的稳定性进行了评价。下载:下载高分辨率图像(106KB)下载:下载全尺寸图像图1不同细胞培养基(a) McCoy和(b) AdvDMEM上APPJ处理产生的H2O2和NO2-
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Plasma Medicine
Clinical Plasma Medicine MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信