Comparison between time-correlated single photon counting and fluorescence correlation spectroscopy in single molecule identification

Jörg Enderlein, Malte Köllner
{"title":"Comparison between time-correlated single photon counting and fluorescence correlation spectroscopy in single molecule identification","authors":"Jörg Enderlein,&nbsp;Malte Köllner","doi":"10.1002/1361-6374(199803)6:1<3::AID-BIO2>3.0.CO;2-M","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Currently, two methods of detection and identification of single molecules are widely used: fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS) and time-correlated single photon counting (TCSPC). We present a thorough theoretical analysis of the error rates for identifying single molecules according to their diffusion coefficients (using FCS), and to their fluorescence lifetimes (using TCSPC). In most cases, the error rate using TCSPC is much lower. TCSPC is thus proven to be more versatile for analyzing single molecule events. The study is significant for a broad range of ultra-sensitive fluorescence detection applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":100176,"journal":{"name":"Bioimaging","volume":"6 1","pages":"3-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/1361-6374(199803)6:1<3::AID-BIO2>3.0.CO;2-M","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioimaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/1361-6374%28199803%296%3A1%3C3%3A%3AAID-BIO2%3E3.0.CO%3B2-M","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Currently, two methods of detection and identification of single molecules are widely used: fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS) and time-correlated single photon counting (TCSPC). We present a thorough theoretical analysis of the error rates for identifying single molecules according to their diffusion coefficients (using FCS), and to their fluorescence lifetimes (using TCSPC). In most cases, the error rate using TCSPC is much lower. TCSPC is thus proven to be more versatile for analyzing single molecule events. The study is significant for a broad range of ultra-sensitive fluorescence detection applications.

时间相关单光子计数与荧光相关光谱在单分子鉴定中的比较
目前广泛应用的单分子检测和鉴定方法有两种:荧光相关光谱法(FCS)和时间相关单光子计数法(TCSPC)。我们根据扩散系数(使用FCS)和荧光寿命(使用TCSPC)对识别单个分子的错误率进行了彻底的理论分析。在大多数情况下,使用TCSPC的错误率要低得多。TCSPC因此被证明是更通用的分析单分子事件。该研究对超灵敏荧光检测的广泛应用具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信