The Effects of Combined Same Session Aerobic and Resistance Training on Physical Performance in Coronary Artery Disease Patients: Protocol Comparison

P. Clavario, C. Bárbara, A. Porcile, C. Russo, T. Zappulla, E apurroa, T Cornero, C FerrariAggradi, T. Mäkikallio, Arto Hautala
{"title":"The Effects of Combined Same Session Aerobic and Resistance Training on Physical Performance in Coronary Artery Disease Patients: Protocol Comparison","authors":"P. Clavario, C. Bárbara, A. Porcile, C. Russo, T. Zappulla, E apurroa, T Cornero, C FerrariAggradi, T. Mäkikallio, Arto Hautala","doi":"10.26420/austinjclincardiolog.2021.1077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aerobic training is included to cardiac rehabilitation programs together with resistance training. The effects of combined aerobic and resistance training performed in a same session with different protocols on peak aerobic capacity (VO2peak) and maximal dynamic strength (1RM: one repetition maximum) are not well known. We compared the effectiveness of two different combined aerobic and resistance training programs for 12 weeks performed three times in a week in stable Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) patients (n=30) who had previously performed aerobic training only. The patients were randomized to High Volume- Low Intensity Group (HLG) or Low Volume-High Intensity Group (LHG). Both groups performed laboratory controlled aerobic exercise first (60min, 80% of lactate threshold) followed by six major muscle group resistance exercises (HLG: 30-35% of 1RM, 3 sets, 12 repetitions) or (LHG: 60-70% of 1RM, 3 sets, 6 repetitions). VO2peak remained at the baseline level for whole study group (23 ± 6 vs. 24 ± 7 ml·kg-1·min-1, p=0.380) and the responses did not differ between the HLG and LHG (p=0.891). Muscle strength increased when analyzed as one group for both upper (Push Up; 24 ± 8 vs. 30 ± 7 kg, p <0.0001) and lower body (Leg Extension; 20 ± 6 vs. 27 ± 6 kg, p <0.0001) with no difference between subgroups (p=0.240 and p=0.504, respectively). As conclusion, combined aerobic and resistance training in the same training session for 12 weeks improved maximal strength independently of the intensity of resistance training. These results highlight the importance of regular resistance training, even at moderate intensity, for CAD patients in terms of physical performance and independent living.","PeriodicalId":90445,"journal":{"name":"Austin journal of clinical cardiology","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Austin journal of clinical cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26420/austinjclincardiolog.2021.1077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aerobic training is included to cardiac rehabilitation programs together with resistance training. The effects of combined aerobic and resistance training performed in a same session with different protocols on peak aerobic capacity (VO2peak) and maximal dynamic strength (1RM: one repetition maximum) are not well known. We compared the effectiveness of two different combined aerobic and resistance training programs for 12 weeks performed three times in a week in stable Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) patients (n=30) who had previously performed aerobic training only. The patients were randomized to High Volume- Low Intensity Group (HLG) or Low Volume-High Intensity Group (LHG). Both groups performed laboratory controlled aerobic exercise first (60min, 80% of lactate threshold) followed by six major muscle group resistance exercises (HLG: 30-35% of 1RM, 3 sets, 12 repetitions) or (LHG: 60-70% of 1RM, 3 sets, 6 repetitions). VO2peak remained at the baseline level for whole study group (23 ± 6 vs. 24 ± 7 ml·kg-1·min-1, p=0.380) and the responses did not differ between the HLG and LHG (p=0.891). Muscle strength increased when analyzed as one group for both upper (Push Up; 24 ± 8 vs. 30 ± 7 kg, p <0.0001) and lower body (Leg Extension; 20 ± 6 vs. 27 ± 6 kg, p <0.0001) with no difference between subgroups (p=0.240 and p=0.504, respectively). As conclusion, combined aerobic and resistance training in the same training session for 12 weeks improved maximal strength independently of the intensity of resistance training. These results highlight the importance of regular resistance training, even at moderate intensity, for CAD patients in terms of physical performance and independent living.
同一次有氧和阻力训练对冠心病患者体能的影响:方案比较
有氧训练与抗阻训练一起被纳入心脏康复计划。在同一时段以不同方案进行有氧和阻力联合训练对峰值有氧能力(VO2peak)和最大动态力量(1RM:一次最大重复)的影响尚不清楚。我们比较了两种不同的有氧和阻力联合训练方案,每周三次,持续12周,对之前只进行有氧训练的稳定冠状动脉疾病(CAD)患者(n=30)的有效性。患者随机分为高容量-低强度组(HLG)和低容量-高强度组(LHG)。两组首先进行实验室控制的有氧运动(60分钟,乳酸阈值的80%),然后进行6个主要肌肉群阻力运动(HLG: 30-35%的1RM, 3组,12次重复)或(LHG: 60-70%的1RM, 3组,6次重复)。整个研究组的vo2峰值保持在基线水平(23±6 vs 24±7 ml·kg-1·min-1, p=0.380), HLG组和LHG组之间的反应无差异(p=0.891)。当分析为一组时,肌肉力量增加了(俯卧撑;24±8 vs. 30±7 kg, p <0.0001)和下体(腿部伸展;20±6 vs. 27±6 kg, p <0.0001),亚组间无差异(p分别为0.240和0.504)。综上所述,在同一训练时段内进行有氧和阻力训练相结合,连续12周提高最大力量,而不依赖于阻力训练的强度。这些结果强调了定期阻力训练的重要性,即使是中等强度的训练,对于冠心病患者的身体表现和独立生活。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信