Al-Quran Digitalization: Adolescent View on the Value of the Digital Al-Quran Application

IF 0.7 Q3 COMMUNICATION
Mahfudlah Fajrie, Dwi Agung Nugroho Arianto, Yuyun Wahyu Izzati Surya, Akhirul Aminulloh
{"title":"Al-Quran Digitalization: Adolescent View on the Value of the Digital Al-Quran Application","authors":"Mahfudlah Fajrie, Dwi Agung Nugroho Arianto, Yuyun Wahyu Izzati Surya, Akhirul Aminulloh","doi":"10.17576/jkmjc-2023-3901-06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study analyses and explains the boundaries between the sacred and profane in digital Al-Quran applications contained in smartphones. This research uses an ethnographic approach. The research study subjects were Muslim teenagers who use digital Al-Quran applications. The results showed a difference in the treatment of Muslim teenagers using digital Al-Quran with the Al-Quran in the form of manuscripts. The existence of a digital Al-Quran makes its sacred value disappear due to the rites, ethics and prohibitions attached to it. In addition, some digital Al-Quran applications bring up advertisements and notifications that interfere with the user's focus on reading them. The development and convergence of the media have made secular values into the Al-Quran and finally eliminated the sacred value of the Al-Quran itself with the loss of the rituals attached to the Al-Quran. The results of this study indicate a novelty, namely that Muslim youth simplify the use of digital Al-Quran applications compared to manuscripts considered more sacred as God's revelation. This shows that modernisation has also bulldozed sacred religious institutions. So, this study criticises the theory of Emil Durkheim and Antony Giddens regarding sacred and profane contexts. Novelty in this research, namely that Muslim youth simplify using digital Al-Quran applications compared to manuscripts considered more sacred as God's revelation. This shows that modernisation has also bulldozed sacred religious institutions. So this study criticises the theory of Emil Durkheim and Antony Giddens regarding sacred and profane contexts. Keywords: Digital Al-Quran, profane, rite, sacred, tradition.","PeriodicalId":45197,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Komunikasi-Malaysian Journal of Communication","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Komunikasi-Malaysian Journal of Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17576/jkmjc-2023-3901-06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study analyses and explains the boundaries between the sacred and profane in digital Al-Quran applications contained in smartphones. This research uses an ethnographic approach. The research study subjects were Muslim teenagers who use digital Al-Quran applications. The results showed a difference in the treatment of Muslim teenagers using digital Al-Quran with the Al-Quran in the form of manuscripts. The existence of a digital Al-Quran makes its sacred value disappear due to the rites, ethics and prohibitions attached to it. In addition, some digital Al-Quran applications bring up advertisements and notifications that interfere with the user's focus on reading them. The development and convergence of the media have made secular values into the Al-Quran and finally eliminated the sacred value of the Al-Quran itself with the loss of the rituals attached to the Al-Quran. The results of this study indicate a novelty, namely that Muslim youth simplify the use of digital Al-Quran applications compared to manuscripts considered more sacred as God's revelation. This shows that modernisation has also bulldozed sacred religious institutions. So, this study criticises the theory of Emil Durkheim and Antony Giddens regarding sacred and profane contexts. Novelty in this research, namely that Muslim youth simplify using digital Al-Quran applications compared to manuscripts considered more sacred as God's revelation. This shows that modernisation has also bulldozed sacred religious institutions. So this study criticises the theory of Emil Durkheim and Antony Giddens regarding sacred and profane contexts. Keywords: Digital Al-Quran, profane, rite, sacred, tradition.
《古兰经》数字化:青少年对《古兰经》数字化应用价值的看法
本研究分析并解释了智能手机中包含的《古兰经》数字应用程序中神圣与世俗的界限。本研究采用人种学方法。研究对象是使用数字古兰经应用程序的穆斯林青少年。结果显示,使用电子版《古兰经》和手抄本《古兰经》的穆斯林青少年受到的对待存在差异。数字化的《古兰经》的存在,使其神圣的价值消失,因为它所附带的仪式、伦理和禁令。此外,一些数字《古兰经》应用程序会弹出广告和通知,干扰用户的阅读注意力。媒介的发展和趋同使世俗的价值融入了古兰经,最终消除了古兰经本身的神圣价值,失去了古兰经所附带的仪式。这项研究的结果表明了一个新奇的现象,即与被认为是神的启示的更神圣的手稿相比,穆斯林青年简化了数字古兰经应用程序的使用。这表明现代化也推倒了神圣的宗教机构。因此,这项研究批判了迪尔凯姆和吉登斯关于神圣和世俗语境的理论。这项研究的新颖之处在于,与被认为是真主启示的更神圣的手稿相比,穆斯林青年简化了使用数字古兰经应用程序的过程。这表明现代化也推倒了神圣的宗教机构。所以这个研究批判了迪尔凯姆和吉登斯关于神圣和世俗语境的理论。关键词:数字化古兰经,亵渎,仪式,神圣,传统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
40.00%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: All scholars are invited to submit manuscripts to Jurnal Komunikasi, Malaysian Journal of Communication. This journal provides a forum for empirical inquiries on human and mass communication and welcome conceptual, philosophical and theoretical essays or debates, book reviews and essay reviews directly contributing to communication or indirectly affecting it as a discipline. We suggest the following broad areas of research: -Communication and Policies -Globalization and Social Impact -Youth and Media Globalisation -Audience Analysis -Media, Democracy and Integration -Media Literacy and Media Education -Media and Development -Health Communication -Politics, Hegemony and the Media -ICT and Power -Gender and Sexuality in The Media -Social Media and Subcultures -Media, Popular Culture and Society -Media and Religion -Media and Identity -War, Conflict and Crisis Communication -Strategic Communication and Information Management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信