PELAKSANAAN DOKUMENTASI ASUHAN KEBIDANAN TERHADAP PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM PASIEN PADA BIDAN PRAKTIK MANDIRI (Studi di Kabupaten Cilacap)

Dewi Puspitasari
{"title":"PELAKSANAAN DOKUMENTASI ASUHAN KEBIDANAN TERHADAP PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM PASIEN PADA BIDAN PRAKTIK MANDIRI (Studi di Kabupaten Cilacap)","authors":"Dewi Puspitasari","doi":"10.20884/1.jih.2019.5.1.103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are still many Independent Practical Midwives in Cilacap District who have not systematically carried out midwifery documentation even though it is needed to know the progress in patient care. This is because midwives have obligations as stipulated in the Regulation of the Minister of Health No. 28 of 2017 on Article 28, namely that midwives have the obligation to systematically record documentation. Registration of midwifery care must be recorded in accordance with midwifery service standards in accordance with Kepmenkes No. 369 of 2007 concerning Midwife Professional Standards. Therefore, this study examines the implementation of midwifery care documentation on BPM and patient legal protection at BPM in Cilacap Regency. This research uses sociological juridical approach, with analytic descriptive type, and using primary data through interview and docuent study with Head of Health Service and Community Resource of Cilacap District Health Office, Head of IBI Branch of Cilacap District, each Head of Branch of Cilacap District, Practice of Midwife in Cilacap District. The results showed that the implementation of documentation on BPM was not in accordance with the Decree of the Ministry of Health 369 of 2007 because there were still midwives using the narrative model recording technique to record everything that was examined by the midwife without mentioning the patient's progress notes. Constraints to the implementation of midwifery care documentation on patient legal protection at BPM in Cilacap Regency are documentation of non-systematic documentation due to lack of awareness of midwives in carrying out systematic documentation, and monev conducted not periodically only when SIPB is extended. So what needs to be considered to solve the problem is that socialization continues to be improved regarding documentation at the BPM according to the midwife's professional standards, periodically monitoring the BPM, and giving strict sanctions to the violating midwife","PeriodicalId":31701,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Idea Hukum","volume":"158 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Idea Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jih.2019.5.1.103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

There are still many Independent Practical Midwives in Cilacap District who have not systematically carried out midwifery documentation even though it is needed to know the progress in patient care. This is because midwives have obligations as stipulated in the Regulation of the Minister of Health No. 28 of 2017 on Article 28, namely that midwives have the obligation to systematically record documentation. Registration of midwifery care must be recorded in accordance with midwifery service standards in accordance with Kepmenkes No. 369 of 2007 concerning Midwife Professional Standards. Therefore, this study examines the implementation of midwifery care documentation on BPM and patient legal protection at BPM in Cilacap Regency. This research uses sociological juridical approach, with analytic descriptive type, and using primary data through interview and docuent study with Head of Health Service and Community Resource of Cilacap District Health Office, Head of IBI Branch of Cilacap District, each Head of Branch of Cilacap District, Practice of Midwife in Cilacap District. The results showed that the implementation of documentation on BPM was not in accordance with the Decree of the Ministry of Health 369 of 2007 because there were still midwives using the narrative model recording technique to record everything that was examined by the midwife without mentioning the patient's progress notes. Constraints to the implementation of midwifery care documentation on patient legal protection at BPM in Cilacap Regency are documentation of non-systematic documentation due to lack of awareness of midwives in carrying out systematic documentation, and monev conducted not periodically only when SIPB is extended. So what needs to be considered to solve the problem is that socialization continues to be improved regarding documentation at the BPM according to the midwife's professional standards, periodically monitoring the BPM, and giving strict sanctions to the violating midwife
在自学助产士方面执行妇产科保护患者的法律文件(Cilacap区的一项研究)
Cilacap区仍有许多独立的实用助产士没有系统地进行助产记录,尽管需要了解患者护理的进展情况。这是因为,根据2017年第28号卫生部长条例第28条的规定,助产士有义务系统地记录文件。助产士护理注册必须按照2007年第369号关于助产士专业标准的接生服务标准进行记录。因此,本研究探讨了助产护理文件的实施BPM和患者的法律保护的BPM在Cilacap摄政。本研究采用社会学法学研究方法,采用分析描述性研究方法,通过访谈和文献研究,对西拉喀普区卫生厅卫生服务和社区资源负责人、西拉喀普区IBI分院院长、西拉喀普区各分院院长、西拉喀普区助产士执业情况进行了初步研究。结果表明,BPM文件的实施不符合卫生部2007年第369号法令,因为仍有助产士使用叙述模式记录技术记录助产士检查的所有内容,而不提及患者的进展记录。在Cilacap Regency的BPM实施助产护理文件对患者法律保护的限制是,由于助产士在执行系统文件方面缺乏认识,因此记录了非系统文件,并且只有在SIPB延长时才定期进行资金投入。因此,要解决这个问题,需要考虑的是根据助产士的专业标准继续改进BPM的文档社会化,定期监控BPM,并对违规的助产士进行严格的制裁
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信