Levels Protein and Fat of Yoghurt Made of Different Types and Number of Cultures

Theresia Ika Purwantiningsih, Maria Adlofina B Bria, K. W. Kia
{"title":"Levels Protein and Fat of Yoghurt Made of Different Types and Number of Cultures","authors":"Theresia Ika Purwantiningsih, Maria Adlofina B Bria, K. W. Kia","doi":"10.32938/jtast.v4i1.967","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research was carried out in June 2020 at the Chemistry Laboratory of the Faculty of Animal Husbandry, Nusa Cendana University, Kupang for testing protein and fat levels. This study aims are to determine the protein and fat content of yoghurt made from various types of milk, the protein and fat content of yoghurt made from different amount cultures, and to determine the interaction between the type of milk and the number of yoghurt cultures. Research material in the form of fresh milk, UHT milk, yoghurt cultures. The design used in this study was a completely randomized design (CRD) with a factorial pattern using 2 treatment factors, namely factor A in the form of type of milk, which consisted of: A1 = fresh milk, A2 = UHT milk (Ultra High Temperature) and factor B in the form of culture. yoghurt consisting of: B1 = Lactobacillus bulgaricus and Streptococcus thermophilus, B2 = Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus bulgaricus, and Streptococcus thermophilus, B3 = Streptococcus thermophilus, Lactobacillus adhophilus, Lactobacillus bulgaricus, and Bifidobacterium animals. From the two factors above, there were 6 treatment combinations consisting of: A1B1, A1B2, A1B3, A2B1, A2B2, A2B3, each combination consisting of 3 replications so that there were 18 experimental sample units. The results showed that the type of milk and the number of bacterial cultures affected the fat content and protein content of yoghurt and there was an interaction between the type of milk and the number of different cultures on the percentage of fat and protein content of yoghurt produced. types of milk with different culture brands had a significant effect (P<0.05) on the percentage of yoghurt fat content. The results of the follow-up test with Duncan's test showed that the combination of treatment between the type of UHT milk and the culture Lactobacillus bulgaricus had a significant effect (P<0.05) on the percentage of yoghurt protein content in all treatments. It can be concluded that fresh milk has higher protein and fat content than UHT milk. The number of cultures 2 (Lactobacillus bulgaricus and Streptococcus thermophilus) produced yoghurt with the highest fat content and protein content. \n ","PeriodicalId":17491,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Tropical Animal Science and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Tropical Animal Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32938/jtast.v4i1.967","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research was carried out in June 2020 at the Chemistry Laboratory of the Faculty of Animal Husbandry, Nusa Cendana University, Kupang for testing protein and fat levels. This study aims are to determine the protein and fat content of yoghurt made from various types of milk, the protein and fat content of yoghurt made from different amount cultures, and to determine the interaction between the type of milk and the number of yoghurt cultures. Research material in the form of fresh milk, UHT milk, yoghurt cultures. The design used in this study was a completely randomized design (CRD) with a factorial pattern using 2 treatment factors, namely factor A in the form of type of milk, which consisted of: A1 = fresh milk, A2 = UHT milk (Ultra High Temperature) and factor B in the form of culture. yoghurt consisting of: B1 = Lactobacillus bulgaricus and Streptococcus thermophilus, B2 = Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus bulgaricus, and Streptococcus thermophilus, B3 = Streptococcus thermophilus, Lactobacillus adhophilus, Lactobacillus bulgaricus, and Bifidobacterium animals. From the two factors above, there were 6 treatment combinations consisting of: A1B1, A1B2, A1B3, A2B1, A2B2, A2B3, each combination consisting of 3 replications so that there were 18 experimental sample units. The results showed that the type of milk and the number of bacterial cultures affected the fat content and protein content of yoghurt and there was an interaction between the type of milk and the number of different cultures on the percentage of fat and protein content of yoghurt produced. types of milk with different culture brands had a significant effect (P<0.05) on the percentage of yoghurt fat content. The results of the follow-up test with Duncan's test showed that the combination of treatment between the type of UHT milk and the culture Lactobacillus bulgaricus had a significant effect (P<0.05) on the percentage of yoghurt protein content in all treatments. It can be concluded that fresh milk has higher protein and fat content than UHT milk. The number of cultures 2 (Lactobacillus bulgaricus and Streptococcus thermophilus) produced yoghurt with the highest fat content and protein content.  
不同菌种和数量酸奶的蛋白质和脂肪含量
这项研究于2020年6月在古邦努沙琴达纳大学畜牧学院化学实验室进行,用于测试蛋白质和脂肪水平。本研究的目的是测定由不同种类的牛奶制成的酸奶的蛋白质和脂肪含量,以及由不同数量的培养物制成的酸奶的蛋白质和脂肪含量,并确定牛奶种类和酸奶培养物数量之间的相互作用。以鲜奶、UHT奶、酸奶培养物的形式研究材料。本研究采用完全随机设计(CRD),采用2个因子的析因模式,即以牛奶类型为形式的因子a,包括:A1 =鲜奶,A2 = UHT牛奶(超高温),以及以培养形式的因子B。酸奶由:B1 =保加利亚乳杆菌和嗜热链球菌,B2 =嗜酸乳杆菌、保加利亚乳杆菌和嗜热链球菌,B3 =嗜热链球菌、嗜热乳杆菌、保加利亚乳杆菌和双歧杆菌组成。由上述两个因素可知,共有A1B1、A1B2、A1B3、A2B1、A2B2、A2B3 6个处理组合,每个组合3个重复,共18个试验样品单元。结果表明,乳的种类和细菌培养物的数量对酸奶的脂肪和蛋白质含量有影响,乳的种类和不同培养物的数量对酸奶的脂肪和蛋白质含量有交互作用。乳种、不同培养品牌对酸奶脂肪含量有显著影响(P<0.05)。Duncan试验的后续试验结果表明,UHT乳型与培养物保加利亚乳杆菌组合处理对各处理酸奶蛋白质含量的影响均显著(P<0.05)。由此可见,鲜奶的蛋白质和脂肪含量高于UHT奶。2个培养物(保加利亚乳杆菌和嗜热链球菌)产生的酸奶脂肪和蛋白质含量最高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信