Macroprudential Policy: A Blessing or a Curse?

Lilit Popoyan
{"title":"Macroprudential Policy: A Blessing or a Curse?","authors":"Lilit Popoyan","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2780687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After the destructive impact of the global financial crisis of 2008, many believe that pre-crisis financial market regulation did not take the \"big picture\" of the system suffciently into account and, subsequently, financial supervision mainly \"missed the forest for the trees\". As a result, the need for macroprudential aspects of regulation emerged, which has recently become the focal point of many policy debates. This has also led to intense discussion on the contours of monetary policy after the post-crisis \"new normal\". Here, I review recent progress in empirical and theoretical research on the effectiveness of macroprudential tools, as well as the current state of the debate, in order to extract common policy conclusions. The work highlights that, despite the achievements in the literature, the current experience and knowledge of how macroprudential instruments work, their calibration, and the mechanisms through which they interact with each other and with monetary policy are rather limited and conflicting. Moreover, I critically survey and note the current challenges faced by macroprudential regulation in creating stable, yet effcient financial systems. At the same time, I emphasize the importance of accepting that many risks may remain, requiring that we proceed prudently and develop better plans for future crises.","PeriodicalId":20862,"journal":{"name":"PSN: International Financial Crises (Topic)","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: International Financial Crises (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2780687","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

After the destructive impact of the global financial crisis of 2008, many believe that pre-crisis financial market regulation did not take the "big picture" of the system suffciently into account and, subsequently, financial supervision mainly "missed the forest for the trees". As a result, the need for macroprudential aspects of regulation emerged, which has recently become the focal point of many policy debates. This has also led to intense discussion on the contours of monetary policy after the post-crisis "new normal". Here, I review recent progress in empirical and theoretical research on the effectiveness of macroprudential tools, as well as the current state of the debate, in order to extract common policy conclusions. The work highlights that, despite the achievements in the literature, the current experience and knowledge of how macroprudential instruments work, their calibration, and the mechanisms through which they interact with each other and with monetary policy are rather limited and conflicting. Moreover, I critically survey and note the current challenges faced by macroprudential regulation in creating stable, yet effcient financial systems. At the same time, I emphasize the importance of accepting that many risks may remain, requiring that we proceed prudently and develop better plans for future crises.
宏观审慎政策:是福还是祸?
在2008年全球金融危机的破坏性影响之后,许多人认为,危机前的金融市场监管没有充分考虑到体系的“大局”,随后的金融监管主要是“只见树木不见森林”。因此,出现了对宏观审慎监管方面的需求,这最近已成为许多政策辩论的焦点。这也引发了关于后危机时代“新常态”后货币政策轮廓的激烈讨论。在这里,我回顾了关于宏观审慎工具有效性的实证和理论研究的最新进展,以及辩论的现状,以便得出共同的政策结论。这项工作强调,尽管在文献中取得了成就,但目前关于宏观审慎工具如何工作、它们的校准以及它们相互作用和与货币政策相互作用的机制的经验和知识相当有限和相互冲突。此外,我批判性地调查并指出当前宏观审慎监管在创建稳定而高效的金融体系方面面临的挑战。与此同时,我强调接受许多风险可能仍然存在的重要性,要求我们谨慎行事,为未来的危机制定更好的计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信