Surfacing the complex conceptions of equity across making and tinkering spaces

IF 1.6 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Ricarose Roque, Stephanie Hladik, Celeste Moreno, Ronni Hayden
{"title":"Surfacing the complex conceptions of equity across making and tinkering spaces","authors":"Ricarose Roque, Stephanie Hladik, Celeste Moreno, Ronni Hayden","doi":"10.1108/ils-10-2022-0115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nRelatively few studies have examined the perspectives of informal learning facilitators who play key roles in cultivating an equitable learning environment for nondominant youth and families in making and tinkering spaces. This study aims to foreground the perspectives of facilitators and highlight the complexities and tensions that influence their equity work.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nInterviews were conducted with facilitators of making and tinkering spaces across three informal learning organizations: a museum, a public library system and a network of community technology centers. This study then used a framework that examined equity along dimensions of access to what, for whom, based on whose values and toward what ends to analyze both the explicit and implicit conceptions of equity that surfaced in these interviews.\n\n\nFindings\nAcross organizations, this study identified similarities and differences in facilitators’ conceptualizations of equity that were influenced by their different contexts and had implications for practice at each organization. Highlighting the complexity of enacting equity in practice, this study found moments when dimensions of equity came together in resonant ways, while other moments showed how dimensions can be in tension with each other.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe complexity that facilitators must navigate to enact equity in their practice emphasizes the need for professional development and support for facilitators to deepen their conceptions and practices around equity beyond access – not just skill building in making and tinkering.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study recognizes the important role that facilitators play in enabling equity-oriented participation in making and tinkering spaces and contributes the “on the ground” perspectives of facilitators to highlight the complexity and tensions of enacting equity in practice.\n","PeriodicalId":44588,"journal":{"name":"Information and Learning Sciences","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information and Learning Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ils-10-2022-0115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Relatively few studies have examined the perspectives of informal learning facilitators who play key roles in cultivating an equitable learning environment for nondominant youth and families in making and tinkering spaces. This study aims to foreground the perspectives of facilitators and highlight the complexities and tensions that influence their equity work. Design/methodology/approach Interviews were conducted with facilitators of making and tinkering spaces across three informal learning organizations: a museum, a public library system and a network of community technology centers. This study then used a framework that examined equity along dimensions of access to what, for whom, based on whose values and toward what ends to analyze both the explicit and implicit conceptions of equity that surfaced in these interviews. Findings Across organizations, this study identified similarities and differences in facilitators’ conceptualizations of equity that were influenced by their different contexts and had implications for practice at each organization. Highlighting the complexity of enacting equity in practice, this study found moments when dimensions of equity came together in resonant ways, while other moments showed how dimensions can be in tension with each other. Practical implications The complexity that facilitators must navigate to enact equity in their practice emphasizes the need for professional development and support for facilitators to deepen their conceptions and practices around equity beyond access – not just skill building in making and tinkering. Originality/value This study recognizes the important role that facilitators play in enabling equity-oriented participation in making and tinkering spaces and contributes the “on the ground” perspectives of facilitators to highlight the complexity and tensions of enacting equity in practice.
在制造和修补空间中呈现公平的复杂概念
目的相对较少的研究考察了非正式学习促进者的观点,他们在为非主导青年和家庭创造公平的学习环境方面发挥了关键作用。本研究旨在突出促进者的观点,并强调影响其公平工作的复杂性和紧张关系。设计/方法/方法对三个非正式学习组织(博物馆、公共图书馆系统和社区技术中心网络)的空间制作和修补促进者进行了采访。然后,本研究使用了一个框架,该框架根据获得什么,为谁,基于谁的价值观以及为了什么目的的维度来检查公平,以分析这些访谈中出现的显性和隐性公平概念。在不同的组织中,本研究确定了引导者对公平概念的异同,这些概念受到不同背景的影响,并对每个组织的实践产生影响。这项研究突出了在实践中制定公平的复杂性,发现了公平维度以共振方式聚集在一起的时刻,而其他时刻则显示了维度如何相互紧张。实践意义辅导员在实践中必须驾驭公平的复杂性,这强调了专业发展和对辅导员的支持的必要性,以深化他们关于公平的概念和实践,而不仅仅是在制作和修补方面的技能培养。原创性/价值本研究认识到促进者在促进以公平为导向的参与创造和修补空间方面发挥的重要作用,并贡献了促进者的“实地”观点,以突出在实践中制定公平的复杂性和紧张关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Information and Learning Sciences
Information and Learning Sciences INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: Information and Learning Sciences advances inter-disciplinary research that explores scholarly intersections shared within 2 key fields: information science and the learning sciences / education sciences. The journal provides a publication venue for work that strengthens our scholarly understanding of human inquiry and learning phenomena, especially as they relate to design and uses of information and e-learning systems innovations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信