Safety culture in surgical centers from the perspective of the multiprofessional team

IF 0.4 Q4 NURSING
Nery José de Oliveira Junior, D. Lourenção, V. B. Poveda, Caren de Oliveira Riboldi, Fabiana Zerbieri Martins, A. Magalhães
{"title":"Safety culture in surgical centers from the perspective of the multiprofessional team","authors":"Nery José de Oliveira Junior, D. Lourenção, V. B. Poveda, Caren de Oliveira Riboldi, Fabiana Zerbieri Martins, A. Magalhães","doi":"10.15253/2175-6783.20222378412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: to evaluate the safety culture through an observation of the safety climate of health workers from a Surgical Center. Methods: cross-sectional study in eight surgical centers from a hospital complex. A validated Brazilian version of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire/Operating Room was applied to a convenience sample of 172 health and support workers (physicians and nurses). The Chi-squared, Student's T, and Mann-Whitney's tests were used. Results: the general evaluation showed a positive safety climate. Only the nursing professionals reached the minimum score that indicates a positive result in the domain Quality of communication and collaboration. The domains Safety climate, Stress recognition, Communication in the surgical environment, and Perception of professional performance showed positive results, while Perception of management and Work conditions had the worst scores. Conclusion: the safety climate was positive. Nonetheless, communication showed shortcomings pointed out by the workers. Contributions to practice: identifying domains that need to be improved helps fomenting safety culture in surgical centers, leading to better care outcomes and work environments.","PeriodicalId":45440,"journal":{"name":"Rev Rene","volume":"105 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rev Rene","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15253/2175-6783.20222378412","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: to evaluate the safety culture through an observation of the safety climate of health workers from a Surgical Center. Methods: cross-sectional study in eight surgical centers from a hospital complex. A validated Brazilian version of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire/Operating Room was applied to a convenience sample of 172 health and support workers (physicians and nurses). The Chi-squared, Student's T, and Mann-Whitney's tests were used. Results: the general evaluation showed a positive safety climate. Only the nursing professionals reached the minimum score that indicates a positive result in the domain Quality of communication and collaboration. The domains Safety climate, Stress recognition, Communication in the surgical environment, and Perception of professional performance showed positive results, while Perception of management and Work conditions had the worst scores. Conclusion: the safety climate was positive. Nonetheless, communication showed shortcomings pointed out by the workers. Contributions to practice: identifying domains that need to be improved helps fomenting safety culture in surgical centers, leading to better care outcomes and work environments.
多专业团队视角下的外科中心安全文化
目的:通过对某外科中心医务人员安全氛围的观察,评价其安全文化。方法:对某医院8个外科中心进行横断面研究。对172名卫生和支助工作人员(医生和护士)的方便样本采用了巴西版的安全态度调查表/手术室。使用了卡方检验、学生T检验和曼-惠特尼检验。结果:总体评价安全气氛良好。只有护理专业人员在沟通和协作质量方面达到了最低分,表明取得了积极的结果。安全气候、压力识别、手术环境中的沟通和专业绩效感知领域表现出积极的结果,而管理和工作条件的感知得分最差。结论:安全气氛良好。然而,沟通显示了工人们指出的缺点。对实践的贡献:确定需要改进的领域有助于促进外科中心的安全文化,从而带来更好的护理结果和工作环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Rev Rene
Rev Rene NURSING-
自引率
20.00%
发文量
63
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信