Humans and their technologies play the infinite game

Q1 Social Sciences
J. Jouhki
{"title":"Humans and their technologies play the infinite game","authors":"J. Jouhki","doi":"10.17011/HT/URN.201902201605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors of the current Human Technology issue approach the relationship between humans and their technologies from quite different angles. Two articles focus on chat technology. In the first, by Khushnood Naqshbandi and her associates (Simon Hoermann, David Milne, Dorian Peters, Benjamin Davies, Sophie Potter, & Rafael A. Calvo), the authors focused on codesigning a chat tool for a voluntary-sector organization based on the experiences and needs of the volunteer workers. Meanwhile, in the second, Marita Skuvje and her colleagues (Ida Maria Haugstveit, Asbjørn Følstad, & Petter Bae Brandtzaeg) explored the differences between communicating with a chatbot and a chat human, particularly when the chatbot’s behavior approaches that of human interaction. Naveen Kumar and Jyoti Kumar, in their paper, discussed the next industrial revolution—Industry 4.0—and proposed a framework based on multiple formulae that address the various aspects of both the human and machine components in measuring the efficiency of future smart factories. However, the article by Subadra Panchanadeswaran and her coauthors (Ardra Manasi Unnithan, Shubha Chacko, Michael Brazda, Natalie Brooks Wilson, & Santushi Kuruppu) presents a very different perspective of smartness, that of smart phones used by sex workers in India and how this technology has transformed both the work and the workers. Finally, Patrick Lehane’s paper on software design explores a theme that is, in some form or another, present in all articles in this issue: the intuitive use of technology. Technological progress is not simply about inventing applications that automate activities previously conducted by humans. People still play key roles in operating a plethora of technological applications—to tell technologies what to do, where to go, what to produce, who to contact, and so on. No matter how complicated the automated machine, the human always is at some end to use, service, or manage it. However, that human must be trained—or she or he must otherwise feel confident enough in the skills needed—to operate the device. Intuitive use","PeriodicalId":37614,"journal":{"name":"Human Technology","volume":"58 1","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17011/HT/URN.201902201605","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The authors of the current Human Technology issue approach the relationship between humans and their technologies from quite different angles. Two articles focus on chat technology. In the first, by Khushnood Naqshbandi and her associates (Simon Hoermann, David Milne, Dorian Peters, Benjamin Davies, Sophie Potter, & Rafael A. Calvo), the authors focused on codesigning a chat tool for a voluntary-sector organization based on the experiences and needs of the volunteer workers. Meanwhile, in the second, Marita Skuvje and her colleagues (Ida Maria Haugstveit, Asbjørn Følstad, & Petter Bae Brandtzaeg) explored the differences between communicating with a chatbot and a chat human, particularly when the chatbot’s behavior approaches that of human interaction. Naveen Kumar and Jyoti Kumar, in their paper, discussed the next industrial revolution—Industry 4.0—and proposed a framework based on multiple formulae that address the various aspects of both the human and machine components in measuring the efficiency of future smart factories. However, the article by Subadra Panchanadeswaran and her coauthors (Ardra Manasi Unnithan, Shubha Chacko, Michael Brazda, Natalie Brooks Wilson, & Santushi Kuruppu) presents a very different perspective of smartness, that of smart phones used by sex workers in India and how this technology has transformed both the work and the workers. Finally, Patrick Lehane’s paper on software design explores a theme that is, in some form or another, present in all articles in this issue: the intuitive use of technology. Technological progress is not simply about inventing applications that automate activities previously conducted by humans. People still play key roles in operating a plethora of technological applications—to tell technologies what to do, where to go, what to produce, who to contact, and so on. No matter how complicated the automated machine, the human always is at some end to use, service, or manage it. However, that human must be trained—or she or he must otherwise feel confident enough in the skills needed—to operate the device. Intuitive use
人类和他们的科技玩着无限的游戏
本期《人类技术》的作者们从不同的角度探讨了人类与技术之间的关系。有两篇文章关注聊天技术。第一篇是由Khushnood Naqshbandi和她的同事(Simon Hoermann、David Milne、Dorian Peters、Benjamin Davies、Sophie Potter和Rafael a . Calvo)撰写的,作者主要根据志愿者的经验和需求为志愿部门组织共同设计了一个聊天工具。与此同时,在第二篇文章中,Marita Skuvje和她的同事(Ida Maria Haugstveit, Asbjørn Følstad, & Petter Bae Brandtzaeg)探讨了与聊天机器人和聊天人类交流的差异,特别是当聊天机器人的行为接近人类互动时。Naveen Kumar和Jyoti Kumar在他们的论文中讨论了下一次工业革命——工业4.0,并提出了一个基于多个公式的框架,该框架在衡量未来智能工厂的效率时解决了人类和机器组件的各个方面。然而,Subadra Panchanadeswaran和她的合著者(Ardra Manasi Unnithan, Shubha Chacko, Michael Brazda, Natalie Brooks Wilson和Santushi Kuruppu)的文章呈现了一个非常不同的智能视角,即印度性工作者使用的智能手机,以及这项技术如何改变了工作和工作者。最后,Patrick Lehane关于软件设计的论文探讨了一个主题,这个主题以某种形式出现在本期所有文章中:技术的直观使用。技术进步不仅仅是发明应用程序,使以前由人类进行的活动自动化。在操作大量的技术应用方面,人仍然扮演着关键的角色——告诉技术做什么、去哪里、生产什么、联系谁,等等。不管自动化机器有多复杂,人类总是在某些方面使用、服务或管理它。然而,这个人必须经过训练——或者她或他必须对所需的技能有足够的信心——才能操作设备。直观的使用
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human Technology
Human Technology Social Sciences-Communication
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
50 weeks
期刊介绍: Human Technology is an interdisciplinary, multiscientific journal focusing on the human aspects of our modern technological world. The journal provides a forum for innovative and original research on timely and relevant topics with the goal of exploring current issues regarding the human dimension of evolving technologies and, then, providing new ideas and effective solutions for addressing the challenges. Focusing on both everyday and professional life, the journal is equally interested in, for example, the social, psychological, educational, cultural, philosophical, cognitive scientific, and communication aspects of human-centered technology. Special attention shall be paid to information and communication technology themes that facilitate and support the holistic human dimension in the future information society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信