The Impact of Socioeconomic Factors on Cancer Survival Rate

Rajabali Daroudi, Nasrin Sargazi, Arya Sakhidel-Hovasin, M. Sheikhy-Chaman
{"title":"The Impact of Socioeconomic Factors on Cancer Survival Rate","authors":"Rajabali Daroudi, Nasrin Sargazi, Arya Sakhidel-Hovasin, M. Sheikhy-Chaman","doi":"10.18502/BCCR.V12I1.5728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The socioeconomic status as a major determinant of health status has a considerable impact on the cancer survival rate. The present study aimed to investigate the impact of socioeconomic factors on the 5-year survival rate for the most common cancer types in 56 countries. Methods: In this ecological study, 5-year survival data for gastric cancer, colon cancer, lung cancer, breast cancer, cervical cancer, ovarian cancer, prostate cancer, and leukemia during the period of 2005-2009 and socioeconomic factors including gross domestic product (GDP), life expectancy, literacy rate, urbanization and healthcare expenditure were extracted from the CONCORD-2 study and the World Bank database, respectively. Multivariable regression analysis was used to estimate the model with the ordinary least-squares (OLS) method using Stata 14 software. Results: The GDP coefficient for breast cancer, cervical cancer, and leukemia was positive and significant. No correlation was identified between gastric, colon, lung, ovarian, and prostate cancers with GDP. Gastric, colon, breast, and prostate cancers had a positive and significant correlation with life expectancy, while no significant correlation was found between lung cancer, cervical cancer, ovarian cancer, and leukemia with life expectancy. There was no correlation between cancer survival rate and literacy rate, or urbanization. There was only a positive correlation between prostate cancer with healthcare expenditure. Furthermore, there was no statistically significant relationship between gastric and ovarian cancers with socioeconomic variables. Finally, GDP and life expectancy had the most significant impact on cancer survival rates. Conclusion: Different countries can play a key role in increasing cancer survival rates by implementing policies to improve economic and social factors.","PeriodicalId":8706,"journal":{"name":"Basic & Clinical Cancer Research","volume":"43 1","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Basic & Clinical Cancer Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/BCCR.V12I1.5728","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The socioeconomic status as a major determinant of health status has a considerable impact on the cancer survival rate. The present study aimed to investigate the impact of socioeconomic factors on the 5-year survival rate for the most common cancer types in 56 countries. Methods: In this ecological study, 5-year survival data for gastric cancer, colon cancer, lung cancer, breast cancer, cervical cancer, ovarian cancer, prostate cancer, and leukemia during the period of 2005-2009 and socioeconomic factors including gross domestic product (GDP), life expectancy, literacy rate, urbanization and healthcare expenditure were extracted from the CONCORD-2 study and the World Bank database, respectively. Multivariable regression analysis was used to estimate the model with the ordinary least-squares (OLS) method using Stata 14 software. Results: The GDP coefficient for breast cancer, cervical cancer, and leukemia was positive and significant. No correlation was identified between gastric, colon, lung, ovarian, and prostate cancers with GDP. Gastric, colon, breast, and prostate cancers had a positive and significant correlation with life expectancy, while no significant correlation was found between lung cancer, cervical cancer, ovarian cancer, and leukemia with life expectancy. There was no correlation between cancer survival rate and literacy rate, or urbanization. There was only a positive correlation between prostate cancer with healthcare expenditure. Furthermore, there was no statistically significant relationship between gastric and ovarian cancers with socioeconomic variables. Finally, GDP and life expectancy had the most significant impact on cancer survival rates. Conclusion: Different countries can play a key role in increasing cancer survival rates by implementing policies to improve economic and social factors.
社会经济因素对癌症存活率的影响
背景:社会经济地位作为健康状况的主要决定因素对癌症存活率有相当大的影响。本研究旨在调查社会经济因素对56个国家最常见癌症类型5年生存率的影响。方法:在本生态研究中,分别从CONCORD-2研究和世界银行数据库中提取2005-2009年胃癌、结肠癌、肺癌、乳腺癌、宫颈癌、卵巢癌、前列腺癌和白血病的5年生存数据以及国内生产总值(GDP)、预期寿命、识字率、城市化和医疗保健支出等社会经济因素。采用多变量回归分析,利用Stata 14软件,采用普通最小二乘(OLS)方法对模型进行估计。结果:乳腺癌、宫颈癌和白血病的GDP系数均为显著正相关。胃癌、结肠癌、肺癌、卵巢癌和前列腺癌与GDP没有相关性。胃癌、结肠癌、乳腺癌、前列腺癌与预期寿命呈显著正相关,肺癌、宫颈癌、卵巢癌、白血病与预期寿命无显著相关。癌症存活率与识字率或城市化之间没有相关性。前列腺癌与医疗支出之间只有正相关。此外,胃癌和卵巢癌与社会经济变量之间没有统计学上的显著关系。最后,GDP和预期寿命对癌症存活率的影响最为显著。结论:不同国家可以通过实施改善经济和社会因素的政策,在提高癌症生存率方面发挥关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信