Consumption Pattern Score in Cancer Survivor with Chemotherapy Induced Nausea and Vomiting and Non-Cancer at Shelter Houses

Zanzabila Ayunda Puspita, C. Nissa, E. Probosari, D. Y. Fitranti
{"title":"Consumption Pattern Score in Cancer Survivor with Chemotherapy Induced Nausea and Vomiting and Non-Cancer at Shelter Houses","authors":"Zanzabila Ayunda Puspita, C. Nissa, E. Probosari, D. Y. Fitranti","doi":"10.14710/jgi.11.1.57-65","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: One of the most common effects of chemotherapy in cancer survivors is nausea and vomiting. This can affect the diversity of food consumed. Family support and assistance need to be done to increase food intake with one food provision.Objectives: This study aimed to find out the difference in the consumption pattern score among cancer survivors and non-cancers in shelter houses.Materials and Methods: This study was a cross-sectional study with a retrospective approach. The criteria of the case subject were undergoing chemotherapy, while the control subject criteria were included in one food supply. The total subject was 66 cancer survivors, with 33 subjects each. This research was conducted from August 2021 until October 2021 at Shelter Houses. The data included the subjects characteristic data, vomit nausea degree data using the Rhodes Index nausea vomiting and retching (RINVR), family support data, food intake data using the food frequency questionnaire (FFQ), and individual dietary diversity score (IDDS) questionnaires. Data collection is done by interviews in person and online. The data collected was analyzed using Chi-Square and bivariate test using Mann Whitney test.Results: The majority of cancer subjects were aged 40-59 years whereas non-cancer subjects were 20-39 years old. The subjects have special characteristics which are in low financial ability. Consumption of starchy foods (p<0.001) and green vegetables (p<0.006) in these two group subjects had significant differences. In addition, the consumption pattern score between cancer and non-cancer subjects made significant differences (p<0.001).Conclusion: Average consumption pattern scores showed cancer subjects were lower compared to non-cancer subjects. Thus, consumption patterns in cancer subjects did not variaty compared to non-cancer subjects. It is necessary to conduct further research by analyzing the diversity of food of each subject using a 1x24 hour for 3 days, food access questionnaire and food security.","PeriodicalId":32498,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Gizi Indonesia The Indonesian Journal of Nutrition","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Gizi Indonesia The Indonesian Journal of Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14710/jgi.11.1.57-65","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: One of the most common effects of chemotherapy in cancer survivors is nausea and vomiting. This can affect the diversity of food consumed. Family support and assistance need to be done to increase food intake with one food provision.Objectives: This study aimed to find out the difference in the consumption pattern score among cancer survivors and non-cancers in shelter houses.Materials and Methods: This study was a cross-sectional study with a retrospective approach. The criteria of the case subject were undergoing chemotherapy, while the control subject criteria were included in one food supply. The total subject was 66 cancer survivors, with 33 subjects each. This research was conducted from August 2021 until October 2021 at Shelter Houses. The data included the subjects characteristic data, vomit nausea degree data using the Rhodes Index nausea vomiting and retching (RINVR), family support data, food intake data using the food frequency questionnaire (FFQ), and individual dietary diversity score (IDDS) questionnaires. Data collection is done by interviews in person and online. The data collected was analyzed using Chi-Square and bivariate test using Mann Whitney test.Results: The majority of cancer subjects were aged 40-59 years whereas non-cancer subjects were 20-39 years old. The subjects have special characteristics which are in low financial ability. Consumption of starchy foods (p<0.001) and green vegetables (p<0.006) in these two group subjects had significant differences. In addition, the consumption pattern score between cancer and non-cancer subjects made significant differences (p<0.001).Conclusion: Average consumption pattern scores showed cancer subjects were lower compared to non-cancer subjects. Thus, consumption patterns in cancer subjects did not variaty compared to non-cancer subjects. It is necessary to conduct further research by analyzing the diversity of food of each subject using a 1x24 hour for 3 days, food access questionnaire and food security.
癌症幸存者化疗引起的恶心呕吐和非癌症患者在收容所的消费模式评分
背景:化疗对癌症幸存者最常见的影响之一是恶心和呕吐。这可能会影响所消费食物的多样性。需要提供家庭支持和援助,以增加一次粮食供应的食物摄入量。目的:本研究旨在了解癌症幸存者与非癌症患者在收容所的消费模式得分的差异。材料与方法:本研究为回顾性横断面研究。病例受试者的标准为化疗,对照组受试者的标准为一次食物供应。研究对象为66名癌症幸存者,每人33名。这项研究于2021年8月至2021年10月在庇护所进行。数据包括受试者特征数据、使用Rhodes指数恶心呕吐和干呕(RINVR)的呕吐恶心程度数据、家庭支持数据、使用食物频率问卷(FFQ)的食物摄入数据和个体饮食多样性评分(IDDS)问卷。数据收集是通过面对面和在线采访完成的。收集的资料采用卡方分析,双变量检验采用Mann Whitney检验。结果:癌症组以40 ~ 59岁为主,非癌症组以20 ~ 39岁为主。经济能力低下的主体具有自身的特点。淀粉类食物(p<0.001)和绿色蔬菜(p<0.006)的摄入量在两组受试者中有显著差异。此外,癌症和非癌症受试者之间的消费模式评分存在显著差异(p<0.001)。结论:癌症患者的平均消费模式得分低于非癌症患者。因此,与非癌症受试者相比,癌症受试者的消费模式没有变化。有必要通过1 × 24小时连续3天、食物获取问卷和食物安全分析每个受试者的食物多样性来进行进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信