Influence of Dentin Surface Roughness, Drying Time, and Primer Application on Self-adhesive Composite-Cement Bond Strength.

Sung-Ae Son, Bit-Na Kim, Jae-Hoon Kim, Deog-Gyu Seo, Jeong-Kil Park
{"title":"Influence of Dentin Surface Roughness, Drying Time, and Primer Application on Self-adhesive Composite-Cement Bond Strength.","authors":"Sung-Ae Son, Bit-Na Kim, Jae-Hoon Kim, Deog-Gyu Seo, Jeong-Kil Park","doi":"10.3290/j.jad.b2916387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the effect of roughness and drying time of dentin as well as the number of coats of a self-adhesive composite-cement primer on the bond strength of self-adhesive composite cement.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Sixty human teeth were prepared and assigned to 12 groups (n = 5), according to three experimental factors: 1) dentin surface roughness, rough or fine, as achieved by 250- and 600-grit silicon carbide papers, respectively; 2) dentin wetness based on air-drying time (5 or 10 s); and 3) the self-adhesive composite-cement primer applications (no-coat, 1-coat, and 2-coat). Composite resin blocks were made with hybrid composite resin (M1 GraceFil) and cemented with G-CEM ONE (both GC). Cement-dentin sticks (12) were prepared, and the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) test was performed. Failure modes were observed with a stereomicroscope (40X), and bonding interfaces were evaluated with confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). Statistical analysis was performed using three-way ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc comparisons test (α = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Dentin roughness (250-grit > 600-grit, p = 0.000), drying time (5-s drying > 10-s drying, p = 0.000), and primer application (no-coat < 1-coat = 2-coat, p = 0.000) had significant effects on bond strength. These factors also showed significant interactions with each other (p = 0.003). The highest μTBS (31.8 ± 3.1 MPa) was observed in the 1-coat/fine roughness/10-s drying group and the lowest μTBS (13.4 ± 2.7 MPa) in the no-coat/coarse roughness/5-s drying group. CLSM showed higher penetration of cement in the primer-coated groups compared to that in the no-coat groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Bond strength between the self-adhesive composite cement and dentin was higher in the fine-roughness dentin group than in the coarse-roughness dentin group, and in the 5-s drying group compared to the 10-s drying group. Applying a primer to dentin improved bond strength of the self-adhesive composite cement.</p>","PeriodicalId":94234,"journal":{"name":"The journal of adhesive dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of adhesive dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.b2916387","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the effect of roughness and drying time of dentin as well as the number of coats of a self-adhesive composite-cement primer on the bond strength of self-adhesive composite cement.

Material and methods: Sixty human teeth were prepared and assigned to 12 groups (n = 5), according to three experimental factors: 1) dentin surface roughness, rough or fine, as achieved by 250- and 600-grit silicon carbide papers, respectively; 2) dentin wetness based on air-drying time (5 or 10 s); and 3) the self-adhesive composite-cement primer applications (no-coat, 1-coat, and 2-coat). Composite resin blocks were made with hybrid composite resin (M1 GraceFil) and cemented with G-CEM ONE (both GC). Cement-dentin sticks (12) were prepared, and the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) test was performed. Failure modes were observed with a stereomicroscope (40X), and bonding interfaces were evaluated with confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). Statistical analysis was performed using three-way ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc comparisons test (α = 0.05).

Results: Dentin roughness (250-grit > 600-grit, p = 0.000), drying time (5-s drying > 10-s drying, p = 0.000), and primer application (no-coat < 1-coat = 2-coat, p = 0.000) had significant effects on bond strength. These factors also showed significant interactions with each other (p = 0.003). The highest μTBS (31.8 ± 3.1 MPa) was observed in the 1-coat/fine roughness/10-s drying group and the lowest μTBS (13.4 ± 2.7 MPa) in the no-coat/coarse roughness/5-s drying group. CLSM showed higher penetration of cement in the primer-coated groups compared to that in the no-coat groups.

Conclusion: Bond strength between the self-adhesive composite cement and dentin was higher in the fine-roughness dentin group than in the coarse-roughness dentin group, and in the 5-s drying group compared to the 10-s drying group. Applying a primer to dentin improved bond strength of the self-adhesive composite cement.

牙本质表面粗糙度、干燥时间和底涂对自粘复合材料-水泥粘接强度的影响
目的:研究牙本质的粗糙度、干燥时间以及自粘复合水泥底漆的涂敷次数对自粘复合水泥粘接强度的影响:制备 60 颗人类牙齿,并根据三个实验因素将其分为 12 组(n = 5):1) 牙本质表面粗糙度(粗糙或细腻,分别由 250 和 600 粒度的碳化硅纸实现);2) 基于风干时间(5 或 10 秒)的牙本质湿度;3) 自粘复合水泥底漆的应用(无涂层、1 涂层和 2 涂层)。复合树脂块由混合复合树脂(M1 GraceFil)制成,并用 G-CEM ONE(均为 GC)粘结。制备了水泥牙签(12 根),并进行了微拉伸粘接强度(μTBS)测试。用体视显微镜(40 倍)观察破坏模式,并用共焦激光扫描显微镜(CLSM)评估粘接界面。统计分析采用三方方差分析和 Tukey 事后比较检验(α = 0.05):结果:牙本质粗糙度(250 磨 > 600 磨,p = 0.000)、干燥时间(5 秒干燥 > 10 秒干燥,p = 0.000)和底涂(无涂层 < 1 涂层 = 2 涂层,p = 0.000)对粘接强度有显著影响。这些因素之间的相互作用也很明显(p = 0.003)。1 层/细粗糙度/10 秒干燥组的 μTBS 最高(31.8 ± 3.1 兆帕),无涂层/粗粗糙度/5 秒干燥组的 μTBS 最低(13.4 ± 2.7 兆帕)。CLSM 显示,与无涂层组相比,涂底漆组的水泥渗透率更高:结论:与粗粗糙度牙本质组相比,细粗糙度牙本质组的自粘复合树脂与牙本质之间的粘结强度更高;与 10 秒干燥组相比,5 秒干燥组的自粘复合树脂与牙本质之间的粘结强度更高。在牙本质上涂一层底漆可提高自粘复合树脂的粘接强度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信