“X” marks the transgressive gender: A qualitative exploration of legal gender-affirmation

IF 1.9 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Teddy G. Goetz, Amanda C. Arcomano
{"title":"“X” marks the transgressive gender: A qualitative exploration of legal gender-affirmation","authors":"Teddy G. Goetz, Amanda C. Arcomano","doi":"10.1080/19359705.2021.2008572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract \n Purpose:\n Gender affirmation for transgender, non-binary, and/or gender diverse (“trans”) persons can include legal name and/or gender marker changes. Gender marker choice has become more com plex with increasing availability of a gender-neutral “X” marker. Yet, little research has characterized trans persons’ perspectives on legal gender affirmation, and its mental health impacts. \n Methods:\n Here we present qualitative research exploring trans individuals’ goals for and barriers from seeking gender-affirming legal care and perspectives on the “X” gender marker. We conducted one-hour semi-structured interviews with 54 trans persons in the U.S. and Canada. \n Results:\n Almost all participants were interested in legal name (had: 54%, want: 33%) and gender marker (had: 46%, want: 46%) changes. Most common barriers included: logistics, fearing violence/discrimination, cost, and legality; 24% reported only updating some identification documents. While some sought an “X” gender marker (had: 11%, want: 19%), 32% considered the “X” harmful, fearing lack of compatibility with other documents and increasing risk of gender-based violence/discrimination. Most reported anxiety and isolation from concerns over mismatched or inaccurate identification documents. \n Conclusions:\n This work offers insight into how legal gender affirmation influences mental health for trans persons, highlighting the importance of mental health providers exploring legal gender affirmation when treating members of the trans community.","PeriodicalId":46675,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gay & Lesbian Mental Health","volume":"7 1","pages":"304 - 318"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gay & Lesbian Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19359705.2021.2008572","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Purpose: Gender affirmation for transgender, non-binary, and/or gender diverse (“trans”) persons can include legal name and/or gender marker changes. Gender marker choice has become more com plex with increasing availability of a gender-neutral “X” marker. Yet, little research has characterized trans persons’ perspectives on legal gender affirmation, and its mental health impacts. Methods: Here we present qualitative research exploring trans individuals’ goals for and barriers from seeking gender-affirming legal care and perspectives on the “X” gender marker. We conducted one-hour semi-structured interviews with 54 trans persons in the U.S. and Canada. Results: Almost all participants were interested in legal name (had: 54%, want: 33%) and gender marker (had: 46%, want: 46%) changes. Most common barriers included: logistics, fearing violence/discrimination, cost, and legality; 24% reported only updating some identification documents. While some sought an “X” gender marker (had: 11%, want: 19%), 32% considered the “X” harmful, fearing lack of compatibility with other documents and increasing risk of gender-based violence/discrimination. Most reported anxiety and isolation from concerns over mismatched or inaccurate identification documents. Conclusions: This work offers insight into how legal gender affirmation influences mental health for trans persons, highlighting the importance of mental health providers exploring legal gender affirmation when treating members of the trans community.
“X”标志着越界的性别:法律性别肯定的定性探索
目的:跨性别者、非二元性别者和/或性别多样化者(“trans”)的性别确认可以包括法定姓名和/或性别标记的改变。随着性别中立的“X”标记越来越多,性别标记的选择变得越来越复杂。然而,关于跨性别者对法律性别肯定的看法及其对心理健康的影响的研究却很少。方法:通过定性研究,探讨跨性别者寻求性别确认法律服务的目标和障碍,以及对“X”性别标记的看法。我们对美国和加拿大的54名跨性别者进行了一小时的半结构化访谈。结果:几乎所有的参与者都对法定名称(有:54%,想要:33%)和性别标记(有:46%,想要:46%)的变化感兴趣。最常见的障碍包括:后勤、害怕暴力/歧视、成本和合法性;24%的人表示只更新了一些身份证明文件。虽然有些人寻求“X”性别标记(有:11%,希望:19%),但32%的人认为“X”有害,担心与其他文件缺乏兼容性,并增加基于性别的暴力/歧视的风险。大多数人报告说,由于担心身份证件不匹配或不准确,他们感到焦虑和孤立。结论:这项工作提供了关于法律性别确认如何影响跨性别者心理健康的见解,强调了心理健康提供者在治疗跨性别群体成员时探索法律性别确认的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
43
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信