Research Responsibility Agreement: a tool to support ethical research

IF 2.1 Q2 ETHICS
M. Murdock, Stephanie Erickson
{"title":"Research Responsibility Agreement: a tool to support ethical research","authors":"M. Murdock, Stephanie Erickson","doi":"10.1177/17470161231166600","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When engaging in community-based research, it is important to consider ethical research practices throughout the project. While current research practices require many investigators to obtain approval from an ethics review board before starting a project, more is required to ensure that ethical principles are applied once the investigations begin and after the investigations are complete. In response to this concern, as expressed by workers at a feminist non-profit during a community placement, we developed a tool to foster both greater ethical and feminist research practice in community-based research. Using feminist theories, methodologies, and concepts such as epistemic justice, epistemic trust, and coauthorship, a tool was developed to support researchers and other collaborators in building relationships of reciprocity. This tool, called the Research Responsibility Agreement (RRA) invites all members of a research project to explicitly reflect on their role in the research, their relationships with other collaborators, their responsibility to contributing meaningfully in the project, and their plans to remain accountable to one another. In doing so, the RRA adds to existing tools that support ethical research by sharing explicit reflections from all collaborators on how to prevent harm and by asking them to reflect on ethical practices beyond the initial stages of the project. The RRA also encourages greater engagement from researchers and collaborators toward building meaningful relationships with each other, and with participants, to work together in advancing social change. As a practical tool that promotes reflection, that builds relationships, and that holds all parties accountable to ethical and feminist research practices, the RRA has the potential to generate impactful change in community-based research projects and beyond. While the RRA is tailored to community-based research, it can be applied widely to any research project and has the potential to revolutionize how research relationships are built across disciplines.","PeriodicalId":38096,"journal":{"name":"Research Ethics","volume":"12 1","pages":"288 - 311"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161231166600","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

When engaging in community-based research, it is important to consider ethical research practices throughout the project. While current research practices require many investigators to obtain approval from an ethics review board before starting a project, more is required to ensure that ethical principles are applied once the investigations begin and after the investigations are complete. In response to this concern, as expressed by workers at a feminist non-profit during a community placement, we developed a tool to foster both greater ethical and feminist research practice in community-based research. Using feminist theories, methodologies, and concepts such as epistemic justice, epistemic trust, and coauthorship, a tool was developed to support researchers and other collaborators in building relationships of reciprocity. This tool, called the Research Responsibility Agreement (RRA) invites all members of a research project to explicitly reflect on their role in the research, their relationships with other collaborators, their responsibility to contributing meaningfully in the project, and their plans to remain accountable to one another. In doing so, the RRA adds to existing tools that support ethical research by sharing explicit reflections from all collaborators on how to prevent harm and by asking them to reflect on ethical practices beyond the initial stages of the project. The RRA also encourages greater engagement from researchers and collaborators toward building meaningful relationships with each other, and with participants, to work together in advancing social change. As a practical tool that promotes reflection, that builds relationships, and that holds all parties accountable to ethical and feminist research practices, the RRA has the potential to generate impactful change in community-based research projects and beyond. While the RRA is tailored to community-based research, it can be applied widely to any research project and has the potential to revolutionize how research relationships are built across disciplines.
研究责任协议:支持伦理研究的工具
在从事基于社区的研究时,在整个项目中考虑伦理研究实践是很重要的。虽然目前的研究实践要求许多研究人员在开始一个项目之前获得伦理审查委员会的批准,但在调查开始和调查完成后,需要更多的伦理原则得到应用。作为对这一问题的回应,正如女权主义非营利组织的工作人员在社区实习期间所表达的那样,我们开发了一个工具,以促进社区研究中更大的伦理和女权主义研究实践。利用女权主义理论、方法和概念,如认知正义、认知信任和合著,开发了一个工具来支持研究人员和其他合作者建立互惠关系。这个工具,被称为研究责任协议(RRA),邀请研究项目的所有成员明确地反映他们在研究中的角色,他们与其他合作者的关系,他们在项目中做出有意义贡献的责任,以及他们对彼此负责的计划。通过这样做,RRA增加了现有的支持伦理研究的工具,通过分享所有合作者对如何防止伤害的明确反思,并要求他们在项目的初始阶段之后反思伦理实践。RRA还鼓励研究人员和合作者更多地参与其中,彼此之间以及与参与者之间建立有意义的关系,共同努力推动社会变革。作为一种促进反思、建立关系、使各方对伦理和女权主义研究实践负责的实用工具,RRA有可能在以社区为基础的研究项目及其他领域产生有影响力的变化。虽然RRA是为基于社区的研究量身定制的,但它可以广泛应用于任何研究项目,并有可能彻底改变跨学科研究关系的建立方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Research Ethics
Research Ethics Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
11.80%
发文量
17
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信