Mental Disorders Diagnosed by Psychiatrist’s Clinical Interviews and Results of the Thematic Apperception Test Conducted by Psychologists

B. Shahbazzadegan, M. Samadzadeh, M. Abbasi
{"title":"Mental Disorders Diagnosed by Psychiatrist’s Clinical Interviews and Results of the Thematic Apperception Test Conducted by Psychologists","authors":"B. Shahbazzadegan, M. Samadzadeh, M. Abbasi","doi":"10.17795/BHS-37479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: One of the most important issues to diagnose mental disorders is the use of independent tools with similar results. Documented history is an important tool to diagnose diseases at each stage. The first and fundamental step in diagnosis is a comprehensive \nclinical interview. \nObjectives: The current study aimed to investigate the concordance of mental disorders diagnosed by psychiatrist’s clinical interviews and results of thematic apperception test (TAT) conducted by psychologists. \nMethods: It was a cross sectional descriptive-analytical study. The study population included the patients (male and female) admitted in psychiatry section of Dr. Fatemi hospital in Ardabil, Iran, during 2009-2010. Data were collected from the archive of Ardebil Dr. Fatemi hospital and about 1200 patients were studied. Demographic data of participants including age, gender, marital status, \nadmission date, discharge date and type of insurance were gathered from the recorded documents. The initial diagnosis of psychologist using TAT test was compared with the final diagnosis recorded for the patient attended by physicians. Data were analyzed \nusing SPSS software, ver. 16. \nResults: Out of 1,200 participants, 660 (55%) were male and 540 (45%) female; 150 (12.5%) subjects were under 25 years old and 284(23.66%) were over 45 years old. Also, 650 subjects were illiterate and the rest were literate. The results of Chi-square test showed a significant difference between diagnoses of psychiatrist’s clinical interviews with TAT results conducted by psychologists (P <0.045). In spite of this difference, the results of TAT test were in relative concordance with psychiatrists’ diagnoses for schizophrenia, depression, bipolar depression and anxiety disease. \nConclusions: The findings showed a relative concordance between psychiatric interviews and psychological assessments in the clinical diagnosis of mental illness. \nKeywords: Mental Disorders, Psychological Interview, Thematic Apperception Test","PeriodicalId":8849,"journal":{"name":"Biotechnology and Health Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biotechnology and Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17795/BHS-37479","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: One of the most important issues to diagnose mental disorders is the use of independent tools with similar results. Documented history is an important tool to diagnose diseases at each stage. The first and fundamental step in diagnosis is a comprehensive clinical interview. Objectives: The current study aimed to investigate the concordance of mental disorders diagnosed by psychiatrist’s clinical interviews and results of thematic apperception test (TAT) conducted by psychologists. Methods: It was a cross sectional descriptive-analytical study. The study population included the patients (male and female) admitted in psychiatry section of Dr. Fatemi hospital in Ardabil, Iran, during 2009-2010. Data were collected from the archive of Ardebil Dr. Fatemi hospital and about 1200 patients were studied. Demographic data of participants including age, gender, marital status, admission date, discharge date and type of insurance were gathered from the recorded documents. The initial diagnosis of psychologist using TAT test was compared with the final diagnosis recorded for the patient attended by physicians. Data were analyzed using SPSS software, ver. 16. Results: Out of 1,200 participants, 660 (55%) were male and 540 (45%) female; 150 (12.5%) subjects were under 25 years old and 284(23.66%) were over 45 years old. Also, 650 subjects were illiterate and the rest were literate. The results of Chi-square test showed a significant difference between diagnoses of psychiatrist’s clinical interviews with TAT results conducted by psychologists (P <0.045). In spite of this difference, the results of TAT test were in relative concordance with psychiatrists’ diagnoses for schizophrenia, depression, bipolar depression and anxiety disease. Conclusions: The findings showed a relative concordance between psychiatric interviews and psychological assessments in the clinical diagnosis of mental illness. Keywords: Mental Disorders, Psychological Interview, Thematic Apperception Test
精神科医生临床访谈诊断精神障碍及心理学家主题统觉测验结果
背景:诊断精神障碍最重要的问题之一是使用具有相似结果的独立工具。有文献记载的病史是诊断疾病各个阶段的重要工具。诊断的第一步和基本步骤是全面的临床访谈。目的:探讨精神科医生临床访谈诊断的精神障碍与心理学家主题统觉测验(TAT)结果的一致性。方法:采用横断面描述性分析研究。研究人群包括2009-2010年在伊朗阿达比尔Dr. Fatemi医院精神科住院的患者(男性和女性)。数据收集自Ardebil Dr. Fatemi医院档案,研究了约1200名患者。从记录的文件中收集参与者的年龄、性别、婚姻状况、入院日期、出院日期和保险类型等人口统计数据。将心理学家使用TAT测试的初步诊断与医生对患者的最终诊断进行比较。数据采用SPSS软件进行分析。16. 结果:在1200名参与者中,660名(55%)为男性,540名(45%)为女性;25岁以下150例(12.5%),45岁以上284例(23.66%)。另外,650名受试者是文盲,其余是识字的。卡方检验结果显示,精神科医生的临床访谈诊断与心理医生的TAT结果有显著差异(P <0.045)。尽管存在这种差异,但TAT测试结果与精神科医生对精神分裂症、抑郁症、双相抑郁症和焦虑症的诊断结果相对一致。结论:精神病学访谈与心理评估在精神疾病的临床诊断中具有相对的一致性。关键词:精神障碍,心理访谈,主题统觉测验
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信