{"title":"Performance Analysis of Novel Iris Monitoring System Based on Canny Detection Algorithm in comparison with Prewitt Algorithm","authors":"D. R. D. Varma, R. Priyanka","doi":"10.1109/iciptm54933.2022.9754088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The objective of the research is to develop the novel iris monitoring system by reducing the noise of the image in the dataset using the canny edge detection techniques in comparison with the prewitt algorithm. Materials and Methods: The total of 30 eye samples were taken to form a dataset. Group 1 represents the canny edge detection algorithm and group 2 represents the prewitt algorithm. The G power calculator was done with 80% of power and alpha of 0.05. Results: Canny algorithm has achieved the significance accuracy of 95.0% when compared to 89.95% of Prewitt algorithm. The Canny algorithm has achieved the significance of ($p < 0.05$) when compared to the prewitt algorithm. Conclusion: In this work it is consolidated that the Canny algorithm has significantly better accuracy when compared with the Prewitt algorithm using Novel Iris Monitoring techniques.","PeriodicalId":6810,"journal":{"name":"2022 2nd International Conference on Innovative Practices in Technology and Management (ICIPTM)","volume":"59 1","pages":"523-527"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 2nd International Conference on Innovative Practices in Technology and Management (ICIPTM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/iciptm54933.2022.9754088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Aim: The objective of the research is to develop the novel iris monitoring system by reducing the noise of the image in the dataset using the canny edge detection techniques in comparison with the prewitt algorithm. Materials and Methods: The total of 30 eye samples were taken to form a dataset. Group 1 represents the canny edge detection algorithm and group 2 represents the prewitt algorithm. The G power calculator was done with 80% of power and alpha of 0.05. Results: Canny algorithm has achieved the significance accuracy of 95.0% when compared to 89.95% of Prewitt algorithm. The Canny algorithm has achieved the significance of ($p < 0.05$) when compared to the prewitt algorithm. Conclusion: In this work it is consolidated that the Canny algorithm has significantly better accuracy when compared with the Prewitt algorithm using Novel Iris Monitoring techniques.