Does Spotify Create Attachment?

Q2 Social Sciences
Culture Unbound Pub Date : 2022-07-24 DOI:10.3384/cu.3384
Adrian Leisewitz, G. Musgrave
{"title":"Does Spotify Create Attachment?","authors":"Adrian Leisewitz, G. Musgrave","doi":"10.3384/cu.3384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper seeks to measure the extent to which algorithmically generated playlists, conceptualised herein as cultural intermediaries (Bourdieu 1984), create ‘attachment’ between consumers of music and producers of music. This was undertaken following debates in the professional music press problematising the ability of streaming platforms to create relationships between artists and listeners and, in a wider discussion, to generate sustainable income for musicians (Chartmetric 2018, Mulligan 2019 in Griffiths 2019, Music Ally 2019). We develop the idea from cultural and economic scholars that intermediation results in ‘attachment’ on behalf of consumers (Callon et.al 2002, Smith Maguire & Matthews 2012) by formulating a definition of the term informed by insights from consumer psychology and applying this framework to a 115-question survey completed by listeners to Spotify’s ‘Discover Weekly’ Playlist for a one-week period. The findings suggest that the playlist was able to generate close to no attachment for those considered poorly-involved new music consumers, and only minor to mid-levels of attachment for those participants considered heavily-involved new music consumers. We therefore propose that algorithmically curated playlists can influence low-cost audience attachment behaviours while their overall impact on the economic success of artists may be limited. This paper contributes towards academic debates concerning the role and impact of cultural intermediaries and lends early empirical support to discussions within the professional music industries and wider public policy (GOV 2020) concerning the uncertain ability of playlists to influence the artist-fan relationship. In addition, by developing a methodologically precise definition of ‘attachment’, it is hoped that the framework provided by this modest study can act as a guide for other researchers to explore the concept of intermediation and attachment with larger sample sizes on alternative playlist types and on other digital platforms. ","PeriodicalId":52133,"journal":{"name":"Culture Unbound","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Culture Unbound","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3384/cu.3384","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper seeks to measure the extent to which algorithmically generated playlists, conceptualised herein as cultural intermediaries (Bourdieu 1984), create ‘attachment’ between consumers of music and producers of music. This was undertaken following debates in the professional music press problematising the ability of streaming platforms to create relationships between artists and listeners and, in a wider discussion, to generate sustainable income for musicians (Chartmetric 2018, Mulligan 2019 in Griffiths 2019, Music Ally 2019). We develop the idea from cultural and economic scholars that intermediation results in ‘attachment’ on behalf of consumers (Callon et.al 2002, Smith Maguire & Matthews 2012) by formulating a definition of the term informed by insights from consumer psychology and applying this framework to a 115-question survey completed by listeners to Spotify’s ‘Discover Weekly’ Playlist for a one-week period. The findings suggest that the playlist was able to generate close to no attachment for those considered poorly-involved new music consumers, and only minor to mid-levels of attachment for those participants considered heavily-involved new music consumers. We therefore propose that algorithmically curated playlists can influence low-cost audience attachment behaviours while their overall impact on the economic success of artists may be limited. This paper contributes towards academic debates concerning the role and impact of cultural intermediaries and lends early empirical support to discussions within the professional music industries and wider public policy (GOV 2020) concerning the uncertain ability of playlists to influence the artist-fan relationship. In addition, by developing a methodologically precise definition of ‘attachment’, it is hoped that the framework provided by this modest study can act as a guide for other researchers to explore the concept of intermediation and attachment with larger sample sizes on alternative playlist types and on other digital platforms. 
Spotify会创建附件吗?
本文试图衡量算法生成的播放列表在多大程度上创造了音乐消费者和音乐制作人之间的“依恋”,本文将其概念定义为文化中介(Bourdieu 1984)。在此之前,专业音乐媒体就流媒体平台在艺术家和听众之间建立关系的能力进行了辩论,并在更广泛的讨论中为音乐家创造可持续收入的能力提出了质疑(Chartmetric 2018年、Mulligan 2019年in Griffiths 2019年、music Ally 2019年)。我们发展了文化和经济学者的观点,即中介会导致代表消费者的“依恋”(Callon et.al 2002, Smith Maguire & Matthews 2012),通过从消费者心理学的见解出发,制定了一个术语的定义,并将这个框架应用于一项由听众完成的115个问题的调查,该调查由Spotify的“发现每周”播放列表进行为期一周的调查。研究结果表明,对于那些被认为不太投入的新音乐消费者来说,播放列表几乎没有产生依恋,而对于那些被认为高度投入的新音乐消费者来说,播放列表只有轻微到中等程度的依恋。因此,我们提出,算法策划的播放列表可以影响低成本的观众依恋行为,但它们对艺术家经济成功的总体影响可能有限。本文有助于关于文化中介的作用和影响的学术辩论,并为专业音乐行业和更广泛的公共政策(GOV 2020)中关于播放列表影响艺术家-粉丝关系的不确定能力的讨论提供早期经验支持。此外,通过开发“依恋”的方法论精确定义,希望这项适度研究提供的框架可以作为其他研究人员在其他播放列表类型和其他数字平台上探索更大样本量的中介和依恋概念的指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Culture Unbound
Culture Unbound Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Culture Unbound: Journal of Current Cultural Research is a journal for border-crossing cultural research, globally open to articles from all areas in this large field, including cultural studies as well as other interdisciplinary and transnational currents for exploring cultural perspectives, issues and phenomena. It is peer-reviewed and easily accessible for downloading as open access. Culture Unbound is hosted by Linköping University Electronic Press (LiU E-Press, www.ep.liu.se). It is based on a co-operation between three Linköping University units that provide a unique profile to the journal, bridging regional and global research traditions: -The Advanced Cultural Studies Institute of Sweden (ACSIS), with interdisciplinary transnational exchange. -The Department of Culture Studies (Tema Q), with interdisciplinary research and PhD education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信