Insegnanti inclusivi: un’indagine empirica sulla formazione specialistica degli insegnanti di sostegno

IF 0.3 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
A. Ciraci, Maria Vittoria Isidori
{"title":"Insegnanti inclusivi: un’indagine empirica sulla formazione specialistica degli insegnanti di sostegno","authors":"A. Ciraci, Maria Vittoria Isidori","doi":"10.7358/ecps-2017-016-cira","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The essay concerns the outcomes of an empirical-experimental research conducted in the annual teacher specialization for special educational needs, at the University of L’Aquila in the academic year 2014/15. The survey is included in the research on the effectiveness of the training courses for teachers. It involved 115 teachers and aimed to investigate whether there has been an actual increase in specific professional skills, school enrollment, among those who followed the specialization course. The data was obtained from the comparison between the control group, consisting of teachers who haven’t begun yet the formation, and the experimental group, constituted by the same teachers at the end of the specialization course. Even if data shows, at different levels of significance, a positive general effect of the course, they do not show appreciable differences in some important didactic-evaluative and communicative-relational dimensions, fundamental to the inclusion process, such as the individualization of didactic intervention, the sharing of training objectives and teaching and evaluation methods with class teachers, the collaboration with families and with operators of social and health services. Teachers, also, claim to have gained more confidence in their professionalism and more security in dealing with the problems encountered in the class. However not all the teachers feel able to apply the educational and didactic strategies learned and to offer their support «to the class». Finally, it appears necessary to review some aspects related to the content of the course and the didactic-training methods used.","PeriodicalId":41872,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational Cultural and Psychological Studies","volume":"9 1","pages":"207-234"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Educational Cultural and Psychological Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7358/ecps-2017-016-cira","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The essay concerns the outcomes of an empirical-experimental research conducted in the annual teacher specialization for special educational needs, at the University of L’Aquila in the academic year 2014/15. The survey is included in the research on the effectiveness of the training courses for teachers. It involved 115 teachers and aimed to investigate whether there has been an actual increase in specific professional skills, school enrollment, among those who followed the specialization course. The data was obtained from the comparison between the control group, consisting of teachers who haven’t begun yet the formation, and the experimental group, constituted by the same teachers at the end of the specialization course. Even if data shows, at different levels of significance, a positive general effect of the course, they do not show appreciable differences in some important didactic-evaluative and communicative-relational dimensions, fundamental to the inclusion process, such as the individualization of didactic intervention, the sharing of training objectives and teaching and evaluation methods with class teachers, the collaboration with families and with operators of social and health services. Teachers, also, claim to have gained more confidence in their professionalism and more security in dealing with the problems encountered in the class. However not all the teachers feel able to apply the educational and didactic strategies learned and to offer their support «to the class». Finally, it appears necessary to review some aspects related to the content of the course and the didactic-training methods used.
包容性教师:对支持教师专业培训的实证调查
本文涉及2014/15学年在拉奎拉大学进行的年度特殊教育需求教师专业化经验实验研究的结果。该调查是教师培训课程有效性研究的一部分。该研究涉及115名教师,目的是调查参加专业课程的教师在特定专业技能和入学率方面是否有实际提高。数据来自于尚未开始形成的对照组和在专业课结束时由同一组教师组成的实验组的比较。即使数据在不同程度上显示了课程的积极总体效果,但它们在一些重要的教学-评估和交流-关系维度上并没有显示出明显的差异,这些维度是包容过程的基础,例如教学干预的个性化,与班主任分享培训目标和教学与评估方法,与家庭以及与社会和卫生服务经营者的合作。教师们也声称,他们对自己的专业能力更有信心,在处理课堂上遇到的问题时也更有安全感。然而,并不是所有的老师都觉得能够运用所学的教育和教学策略,并为“课堂”提供支持。最后,似乎有必要审查与课程内容和所使用的教学训练方法有关的某些方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信