Effect of herbicides on weeds, yield and economics of chickpea

Ajaya Kashyap, H. Kushwaha, H. Mishra
{"title":"Effect of herbicides on weeds, yield and economics of chickpea","authors":"Ajaya Kashyap, H. Kushwaha, H. Mishra","doi":"10.5958/0974-8164.2022.00033.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A filed experiment was conducted at Mahatma Gandhi Chitrakoot Gramodaya Vishwavidyalaya, Chitrakoot, Satna, Madhya Pradesh during winter ( Rabi ) season of 2019-20 and 2020-21 to assess the efficacy of herbicides on production and profitability of chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.). The experiment was laid out in a randomized block design with ten treatments and three replications. The crop was sown as per the package of practices recommended for zone Kymore Plateau of Madhya Pradesh. The major monocot weed was Cynodon dactylon and dominant dicot weed was Chenopodium album at 30 days after sowing (DAS). At 30 DAS, significantly lower weed density (7.75/m 2 ) and biomass (2.70 g/m 2 ) were recorded with post-emergence application (PoE) of fomesafen (11.1% W/W) 220 g + fluazifop-p-butyl (11.1% W/W) 220 g/ha PoE at 20 DAS, followed by imazethapyr (35%) + imazamox (35%) 100 g/ha PoE at 20 DAS. The lowest weed index was noted with imazethapyr 55 g/ha PoE followed by pre-emergence application (PE) of pendimethalin 0.75 kg/ha and fomesafen 220 g + fluazifop-p-butyl 220 g/ha PoE at 30 DAS. Higher weed control efficiency (WCE) at 30 DAS was recorded with fomesafen 220 g + fluazifop-p-butyl 220 g/ha (70.6%) followed by hand weeding at 20 and 40 DAS (57.1%). However, fomesafen 220 g + fluazifop-p-butyl 220 g/ha PoE at 20 DAS and imazethapyr + imazamox 100 g/ha PoE at 20 DAS caused severe injury to chickpea plants and even mortality of a few plants. Significantly higher 1000 seed weight (183.0 g) and grain yield (1.79 t/ha) were observed with imazethapyr 55 g/ha PoE which was statistically at par with weed free check. Significantly higher net returns ( 70746/ha) and B:C ratio (3.97) were recorded with imazethapyr 55 g/ha PoE ( 70746/ha), followed by pendimethalin 0.75 kg/ha PE. The monetary efficiency ( 589.5/ha/day) of imazethapyr 55 g/ha PoE was statistically at par with weed free ( 541.3/ha/day) and was significantly higher than all other treatments.","PeriodicalId":13467,"journal":{"name":"INDIAN JOURNAL OF WEED SCIENCE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INDIAN JOURNAL OF WEED SCIENCE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-8164.2022.00033.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

A filed experiment was conducted at Mahatma Gandhi Chitrakoot Gramodaya Vishwavidyalaya, Chitrakoot, Satna, Madhya Pradesh during winter ( Rabi ) season of 2019-20 and 2020-21 to assess the efficacy of herbicides on production and profitability of chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.). The experiment was laid out in a randomized block design with ten treatments and three replications. The crop was sown as per the package of practices recommended for zone Kymore Plateau of Madhya Pradesh. The major monocot weed was Cynodon dactylon and dominant dicot weed was Chenopodium album at 30 days after sowing (DAS). At 30 DAS, significantly lower weed density (7.75/m 2 ) and biomass (2.70 g/m 2 ) were recorded with post-emergence application (PoE) of fomesafen (11.1% W/W) 220 g + fluazifop-p-butyl (11.1% W/W) 220 g/ha PoE at 20 DAS, followed by imazethapyr (35%) + imazamox (35%) 100 g/ha PoE at 20 DAS. The lowest weed index was noted with imazethapyr 55 g/ha PoE followed by pre-emergence application (PE) of pendimethalin 0.75 kg/ha and fomesafen 220 g + fluazifop-p-butyl 220 g/ha PoE at 30 DAS. Higher weed control efficiency (WCE) at 30 DAS was recorded with fomesafen 220 g + fluazifop-p-butyl 220 g/ha (70.6%) followed by hand weeding at 20 and 40 DAS (57.1%). However, fomesafen 220 g + fluazifop-p-butyl 220 g/ha PoE at 20 DAS and imazethapyr + imazamox 100 g/ha PoE at 20 DAS caused severe injury to chickpea plants and even mortality of a few plants. Significantly higher 1000 seed weight (183.0 g) and grain yield (1.79 t/ha) were observed with imazethapyr 55 g/ha PoE which was statistically at par with weed free check. Significantly higher net returns ( 70746/ha) and B:C ratio (3.97) were recorded with imazethapyr 55 g/ha PoE ( 70746/ha), followed by pendimethalin 0.75 kg/ha PE. The monetary efficiency ( 589.5/ha/day) of imazethapyr 55 g/ha PoE was statistically at par with weed free ( 541.3/ha/day) and was significantly higher than all other treatments.
除草剂对鹰嘴豆杂草、产量和经济的影响
在2019-20和2020-21冬季(Rabi)季节,在印度中邦萨特纳邦Chitrakoot的Mahatma Gandhi Chitrakoot Gramodaya Vishwavidyalaya进行了田间试验,以评估除草剂对鹰嘴豆(Cicer arietinum L.)产量和盈利能力的影响。试验采用随机区组设计,设10个处理,3个重复。作物是按照中央邦Kymore高原地区推荐的一揽子做法播种的。播后30 d单子叶杂草以Cynodon dactylon为主,双子叶杂草以Chenopodium album为主。30 DAS时,出苗后施用(PoE) 20 DAS时,喷施(11.1% W/W) 220 g +氟唑磷-对丁基(11.1% W/W) 220 g/ha PoE,显著降低了杂草密度(7.75 g/ m2)和生物量(2.70 g/ m2),其次是20 DAS时喷施(35%)+咪唑莫(35%)100 g/ha PoE。以咪唑吡喃55 g/ha PoE处理的杂草指数最低,其次为羽化前喷施0.75 kg/ha的二甲醚,30 DAS时喷施220 g +氟唑磷-对丁基220 g/ha PoE。在30 DAS时,采用氟硝芬220 g +氟硝磷-对丁基220 g/ha(70.6%),其次是20和40 DAS时的手动除草(57.1%)。而氟美沙芬220 g +氟唑磷-对丁基220 g/ha PoE在20 DAS和imazethapyr + imazamox 100 g/ha PoE在20 DAS对鹰嘴豆植株造成严重伤害,甚至少数植株死亡。施用55 g/ hm2的吡嗪噻虫啉可显著提高1000粒重(183.0 g)和籽粒产量(1.79 t/ hm2),与无杂草处理相当。imazethapyr 55 g/ha PoE (70746/ha)和pendimethalin 0.75 kg/ha PE的净收益(70746/ha)和B:C比(3.97)显著高于对照。55 g/ha PoE的经济效率(589.5/ha/day)与无杂草处理(541.3/ha/day)相当,显著高于其他所有处理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信