Extending the Interdependence Theory to Local Public Service Provision: Evidence from Iowa

IF 2.2 Q2 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
Saman Shafiq, K. Albrecht, Kelly LeRoux
{"title":"Extending the Interdependence Theory to Local Public Service Provision: Evidence from Iowa","authors":"Saman Shafiq, K. Albrecht, Kelly LeRoux","doi":"10.1515/npf-2022-0036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Lester Salamon’s interdependence theory has held up over time and across dozens of national contexts. However, the theory has largely been developed through data on government partnerships with nonprofits for providing social services. While government-nonprofit partnerships exist in various service areas and policy contexts, the theory has rarely been applied in less “traditional” service settings. We apply a mixed-method sequential research design – empirical analysis followed by a comparative case analysis – to understand the descriptive and explanatory power of Salamon’s interdependence theory and to differentiate its applications from other theories of government-nonprofit partnerships. Our analysis shows that nonprofits are extensively engaged in public service delivery at the local level, partnering with county and municipal governments to carry out essential public services well beyond the scope of social welfare functions and human services. Expanding the concept of interdependence theory, our findings further show that in local service delivery settings, there is a unique balancing of aspects of both voluntary and government failure that can be achieved.","PeriodicalId":44152,"journal":{"name":"Nonprofit Policy Forum","volume":"23 1","pages":"255 - 278"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nonprofit Policy Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/npf-2022-0036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract Lester Salamon’s interdependence theory has held up over time and across dozens of national contexts. However, the theory has largely been developed through data on government partnerships with nonprofits for providing social services. While government-nonprofit partnerships exist in various service areas and policy contexts, the theory has rarely been applied in less “traditional” service settings. We apply a mixed-method sequential research design – empirical analysis followed by a comparative case analysis – to understand the descriptive and explanatory power of Salamon’s interdependence theory and to differentiate its applications from other theories of government-nonprofit partnerships. Our analysis shows that nonprofits are extensively engaged in public service delivery at the local level, partnering with county and municipal governments to carry out essential public services well beyond the scope of social welfare functions and human services. Expanding the concept of interdependence theory, our findings further show that in local service delivery settings, there is a unique balancing of aspects of both voluntary and government failure that can be achieved.
将相互依存理论扩展到地方公共服务提供:来自爱荷华州的证据
莱斯特·萨拉蒙(Lester Salamon)的相互依存理论在几十个国家的背景下都经得起时间的考验。然而,这一理论在很大程度上是通过政府与非营利组织合作提供社会服务的数据发展起来的。虽然政府与非营利组织的合作关系存在于各种服务领域和政策背景中,但这一理论很少应用于不那么“传统”的服务环境。我们采用混合方法的顺序研究设计——实证分析之后是比较案例分析——来理解萨拉蒙的相互依赖理论的描述和解释能力,并将其应用与其他政府-非营利伙伴关系理论区分开来。我们的分析表明,非营利组织在地方层面广泛参与公共服务的提供,与县政府和市政府合作,开展远远超出社会福利职能和人类服务范围的基本公共服务。扩展相互依赖理论的概念,我们的研究结果进一步表明,在地方服务提供环境中,可以实现自愿和政府失败方面的独特平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nonprofit Policy Forum
Nonprofit Policy Forum PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
18.80%
发文量
23
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信