Farinograph Vs. Alveograph in Predictive Modelling of Wheat Flours Quality

R. Tamba-Berehoiu, C. Popa, L. Vişan, V. Simion, R. Dobrinoiu, S. Dănăilă-Guidea
{"title":"Farinograph Vs. Alveograph in Predictive Modelling of Wheat Flours Quality","authors":"R. Tamba-Berehoiu, C. Popa, L. Vişan, V. Simion, R. Dobrinoiu, S. Dănăilă-Guidea","doi":"10.2478/alife-2018-0092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The aim of the research was to determine to what extent the farinograph and alveograph parameters correlate with each other, and with the physical-chemical parameters, frequently used in the evaluation of wheat flours quality. Thus, 81 samples of wheat flours were analyzed. We found a better correlation of alveographic parameters, such as Extensibility and Mechanical Work (r2 varied between 0.48-0.51), with Protein content and Gluten content of flours, compared to farinographic parameters: Development time and Stability (r2 varied between 0.25-0.35). A poor correlation between farinographicand alveographic parameters was observed, the maximum value of the determination coefficient being r2=0.40, between Stability and Mechanical Work. The factorial analysis led to the highlight of four principal components. The first principal component was strongly correlated with the Protein content (including Gluten) of flours, with most farinographic (except for Water absorptin) and alveographic parameters (Mechanical work, W and Extensibility index, G). This component appears to express the tolerance of flours to the mechanical stress, exerted in the dough phase and their ability to preserve the own viscosity under mechanical stress conditions. The second principal component is related to the dough resistance to deformation, as expressed by the alveographic parameters Resistance and the P/L ratio. Principal components three and four were strongly correlated with flours ash (extraction degree) and amilolytic activity.","PeriodicalId":6413,"journal":{"name":"“Agriculture for Life, Life for Agriculture” Conference Proceedings","volume":"101 1","pages":"586 - 593"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"“Agriculture for Life, Life for Agriculture” Conference Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/alife-2018-0092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract The aim of the research was to determine to what extent the farinograph and alveograph parameters correlate with each other, and with the physical-chemical parameters, frequently used in the evaluation of wheat flours quality. Thus, 81 samples of wheat flours were analyzed. We found a better correlation of alveographic parameters, such as Extensibility and Mechanical Work (r2 varied between 0.48-0.51), with Protein content and Gluten content of flours, compared to farinographic parameters: Development time and Stability (r2 varied between 0.25-0.35). A poor correlation between farinographicand alveographic parameters was observed, the maximum value of the determination coefficient being r2=0.40, between Stability and Mechanical Work. The factorial analysis led to the highlight of four principal components. The first principal component was strongly correlated with the Protein content (including Gluten) of flours, with most farinographic (except for Water absorptin) and alveographic parameters (Mechanical work, W and Extensibility index, G). This component appears to express the tolerance of flours to the mechanical stress, exerted in the dough phase and their ability to preserve the own viscosity under mechanical stress conditions. The second principal component is related to the dough resistance to deformation, as expressed by the alveographic parameters Resistance and the P/L ratio. Principal components three and four were strongly correlated with flours ash (extraction degree) and amilolytic activity.
小麦面粉品质预测模型中的面粉造影与肺泡造影
摘要本研究的目的是确定在小麦面粉品质评价中常用的粉谱仪和肺泡仪参数之间以及与理化参数之间的关联程度。因此,对81个小麦面粉样本进行了分析。我们发现,与面粉参数、发育时间和稳定性(r2在0.25-0.35之间)相比,肺泡学参数(如可伸性和机械功)与面粉的蛋白质含量和麸质含量(r2在0.48-0.51之间)的相关性更好。在稳定性和机械功之间,测定系数的最大值为r2=0.40。析因分析得出四个主成分的重点。第一个主成分与面粉的蛋白质含量(包括面筋)密切相关,与大多数面粉学参数(吸水率除外)和肺泡学参数(机械功,W和拉伸指数,G)密切相关。该成分似乎表达了面粉对面团阶段施加的机械应力的耐受性以及在机械应力条件下保持自身粘度的能力。第二个主成分与面团抗变形能力有关,由泡形参数和P/L比表示。主成分3和主成分4与面粉灰分(萃取度)和溶淀粉活性密切相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信