Simple method for measuring phase transfer functions of transducers

P. van Neer, H. Vos, M. Danilouchkine, N. de Jong
{"title":"Simple method for measuring phase transfer functions of transducers","authors":"P. van Neer, H. Vos, M. Danilouchkine, N. de Jong","doi":"10.1109/ULTSYM.2010.5935890","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The impulse response of a transducer can be represented in the frequency domain by its complex analog, the transfer function. The amplitude transfer function is measured regularly in contrast to the phase transfer function (PTF). Applications for the PTF range from adjusting the emitted pulse shape for coding based imaging to the optimization of ultrasound contrast imaging methods based on destructive interference. A number of acoustic methods to measure a transducer's PTF exists, but they usually require accurate distance and acoustic wave speed measurements. Small discrepancies in these cause large phase errors. We present a pulse-echo method to measure a transducer's PTF without needing a measurement of the wave travel distance and speed. We generalize it to rectangular transducers. In our method the transducer is excited by a monofrequency sine burst with a rectangular envelope. The transducer initially vibrates at resonance (transient regime) prior to the forcing frequency (steady state regime). The PTF value of the system is the difference between the phases deduced from the transient and the steady state regimes at different forcing frequencies. As the PTF is calculated from a relative difference measuring the wave travel distance or speed is unnecessary. The approach assumes linear wave propagation and uses a pulse-echo setup. The method was tested on a custom built single element transducer (square: 13 × 13 mm, center frequency 4 MHz, no backing or matching layers). The results were compared with KLM model simulations. Also, we phase calibrated a hydrophone, which was then used to measure the PTF of the square transducer. The simulated and measured resonance frequencies differed by 0.17 MHz. The mean PTF difference between simulation and measurements was 7°–14°. The method's reproducibility was ±15°. The PTF of the transducer was measured with good reproducibility, without measuring the wave travel distance or speed of sound in the medium. Our simple setup requires basic laboratory ultrasound equipment.","PeriodicalId":6437,"journal":{"name":"2010 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ULTSYM.2010.5935890","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The impulse response of a transducer can be represented in the frequency domain by its complex analog, the transfer function. The amplitude transfer function is measured regularly in contrast to the phase transfer function (PTF). Applications for the PTF range from adjusting the emitted pulse shape for coding based imaging to the optimization of ultrasound contrast imaging methods based on destructive interference. A number of acoustic methods to measure a transducer's PTF exists, but they usually require accurate distance and acoustic wave speed measurements. Small discrepancies in these cause large phase errors. We present a pulse-echo method to measure a transducer's PTF without needing a measurement of the wave travel distance and speed. We generalize it to rectangular transducers. In our method the transducer is excited by a monofrequency sine burst with a rectangular envelope. The transducer initially vibrates at resonance (transient regime) prior to the forcing frequency (steady state regime). The PTF value of the system is the difference between the phases deduced from the transient and the steady state regimes at different forcing frequencies. As the PTF is calculated from a relative difference measuring the wave travel distance or speed is unnecessary. The approach assumes linear wave propagation and uses a pulse-echo setup. The method was tested on a custom built single element transducer (square: 13 × 13 mm, center frequency 4 MHz, no backing or matching layers). The results were compared with KLM model simulations. Also, we phase calibrated a hydrophone, which was then used to measure the PTF of the square transducer. The simulated and measured resonance frequencies differed by 0.17 MHz. The mean PTF difference between simulation and measurements was 7°–14°. The method's reproducibility was ±15°. The PTF of the transducer was measured with good reproducibility, without measuring the wave travel distance or speed of sound in the medium. Our simple setup requires basic laboratory ultrasound equipment.
测量换能器相传递函数的简单方法
换能器的脉冲响应可以在频域用它的复杂模拟物——传递函数来表示。与相传递函数(PTF)相比,振幅传递函数是定期测量的。PTF的应用范围从调整基于编码成像的发射脉冲形状到基于相消干涉的超声对比成像方法的优化。存在许多测量换能器PTF的声学方法,但它们通常需要精确的距离和声波速度测量。这些小的差异会导致大的相位误差。我们提出了一种脉冲回波法来测量换能器的PTF,而不需要测量波的传播距离和速度。我们把它推广到矩形换能器。在我们的方法中,换能器是由矩形包络的单频正弦脉冲激发的。换能器在强制频率(稳态频率)之前以共振(瞬态状态)振动。系统的PTF值是在不同的强迫频率下由瞬态和稳态状态推导出的相位之差。由于PTF是由相对差来计算的,所以不需要测量波的传播距离或速度。该方法假设线性波传播并使用脉冲回波设置。该方法在定制的单元件传感器(方形:13 × 13 mm,中心频率4 MHz,无衬底或匹配层)上进行了测试。结果与荷航模型模拟结果进行了比较。此外,我们还对水听器进行了相位校准,然后将其用于测量方形换能器的PTF。模拟谐振频率与实测谐振频率相差0.17 MHz。模拟和测量的平均PTF差为7°-14°。方法重现性为±15°。该传感器的PTF测量具有良好的再现性,无需测量介质中的波传播距离或声速。我们的简单设置需要基本的实验室超声设备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信