Police Discretion Policy In Handling Middle/Minor Crimes (Tipiring) Based On Justice Value

Q2 Social Sciences
Saptanti Lastari, S. Kusriyah
{"title":"Police Discretion Policy In Handling Middle/Minor Crimes (Tipiring) Based On Justice Value","authors":"Saptanti Lastari, S. Kusriyah","doi":"10.30659/ldj.3.3.579-586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to analyze the police discretionary policy in handling minor crimes (Tipiring) not based on the value of justice, analyze the constraints of the police discretionary policy in handling minor crimes (Tipiring) at this time and analyze the police discretionary policy in handling criminal acts (Tipiring) in the future. This study uses a sociological juridical approach, with analytical descriptive research methods. The data used are primary and secondary data which will be analyzed qualitatively. The research problem was analyzed using the theory of justice and the theory of the operation of law. The results of the study conclude that discretion is a police action that must be accounted for based on applicable laws and norms, police discretion is very vulnerable to irregularities and abuse so it needs to be given limits and supervision, so it can be said that it is not fair. Constraints on police discretionary policy in handling minor crimes consist of internal constraints and external constraints on the part of the police. The ideal policy of the Police's discretion in handling minor crimes (Tipiring) is: a) Not against a rule of law. b) In line with legal obligations that require an official action to be taken. c) The action must be appropriate and reasonable and included in the environment of his office, on appropriate considerations based on compelling circumstances, respecting human rights","PeriodicalId":55646,"journal":{"name":"Law Environment and Development Journal","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law Environment and Development Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30659/ldj.3.3.579-586","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the police discretionary policy in handling minor crimes (Tipiring) not based on the value of justice, analyze the constraints of the police discretionary policy in handling minor crimes (Tipiring) at this time and analyze the police discretionary policy in handling criminal acts (Tipiring) in the future. This study uses a sociological juridical approach, with analytical descriptive research methods. The data used are primary and secondary data which will be analyzed qualitatively. The research problem was analyzed using the theory of justice and the theory of the operation of law. The results of the study conclude that discretion is a police action that must be accounted for based on applicable laws and norms, police discretion is very vulnerable to irregularities and abuse so it needs to be given limits and supervision, so it can be said that it is not fair. Constraints on police discretionary policy in handling minor crimes consist of internal constraints and external constraints on the part of the police. The ideal policy of the Police's discretion in handling minor crimes (Tipiring) is: a) Not against a rule of law. b) In line with legal obligations that require an official action to be taken. c) The action must be appropriate and reasonable and included in the environment of his office, on appropriate considerations based on compelling circumstances, respecting human rights
基于司法价值的警察处理中小犯罪的自由裁量权政策
本研究的目的是分析警察在处理未成年人犯罪(Tipiring)时的自由裁量政策,分析当前警察在处理未成年人犯罪(Tipiring)时的自由裁量政策的制约因素,并分析未来警察在处理犯罪行为(Tipiring)时的自由裁量政策。本研究采用社会学、法学的研究方法,辅以分析性、描述性的研究方法。所使用的数据是主要和次要数据,将进行定性分析。运用正义理论和法律运行理论对研究问题进行了分析。研究结果表明,自由裁量权是一种警察行为,必须根据适用的法律和规范进行解释,警察自由裁量权非常容易出现违规和滥用现象,因此需要对其进行限制和监督,因此可以说是不公平的。对警察处理未成年人犯罪自由裁量权政策的制约包括警察自身的内部制约和外部制约。警方酌情处理轻微罪行的理想政策是:a)不违反法治。b)符合需要采取官方行动的法律义务。c)行动必须是适当和合理的,并包括在其办公室的环境中,基于强制性情况的适当考虑,尊重人权
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信