¿Prono en ventilación espontánea? Un problema de inducción: una revisión panorámica

Aurio Fajardo , Vicent Modesto i Alapont , Alberto Medina , Alejandro González-Castro , Enrique Monares , Aurio Fajardo Siguenza
{"title":"¿Prono en ventilación espontánea? Un problema de inducción: una revisión panorámica","authors":"Aurio Fajardo ,&nbsp;Vicent Modesto i Alapont ,&nbsp;Alberto Medina ,&nbsp;Alejandro González-Castro ,&nbsp;Enrique Monares ,&nbsp;Aurio Fajardo Siguenza","doi":"10.1016/j.acci.2023.04.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Intoduction</h3><p>Prone position in spontaneous ventilation is not a recent strategy, and despite the many years it has been trying to consolidate, it has not been able to prove to be of real utility. During the recent pandemic, prone spontaneous ventilation re-emerged as a practical and simple alternative, although it was highly questioned due to its weak level of evidence. With time and experience, it was gradually relegated to become only an attractive hypothesis.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study aims to analyze the potential benefits of prone position in spontaneous ventilation in patients with hypoxemia caused by SARS-CoV-2.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A panoramic review of the most relevant studies published in the MEDLINE, Embase and Scopus databases up to December 20, 2021 was performed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>After screening, 4 observational studies, 1 randomized clinical trial, and 3 systematic reviews were selected for analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>By statistical analysis we concluded that prone position in spontaneous ventilation, although it could delay intubation, did not improve survival in hypoxemic subjects with viral pneumonia caused by coronavirus type 2.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100016,"journal":{"name":"Acta Colombiana de Cuidado Intensivo","volume":"23 4","pages":"Pages 353-362"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Colombiana de Cuidado Intensivo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S012272622300023X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intoduction

Prone position in spontaneous ventilation is not a recent strategy, and despite the many years it has been trying to consolidate, it has not been able to prove to be of real utility. During the recent pandemic, prone spontaneous ventilation re-emerged as a practical and simple alternative, although it was highly questioned due to its weak level of evidence. With time and experience, it was gradually relegated to become only an attractive hypothesis.

Objective

This study aims to analyze the potential benefits of prone position in spontaneous ventilation in patients with hypoxemia caused by SARS-CoV-2.

Methods

A panoramic review of the most relevant studies published in the MEDLINE, Embase and Scopus databases up to December 20, 2021 was performed.

Results

After screening, 4 observational studies, 1 randomized clinical trial, and 3 systematic reviews were selected for analysis.

Conclusions

By statistical analysis we concluded that prone position in spontaneous ventilation, although it could delay intubation, did not improve survival in hypoxemic subjects with viral pneumonia caused by coronavirus type 2.

Prono在自发通风吗?归纳问题:全景回顾
自然通气中的俯卧位并不是最近才出现的策略,尽管多年来一直在努力巩固,但它尚未被证明具有真正的效用。在最近的大流行期间,倾向自发通气作为一种实用和简单的替代方案重新出现,尽管由于证据不足而受到高度质疑。随着时间的推移和经验的积累,它逐渐沦为一种吸引人的假设。目的分析SARS-CoV-2所致低氧血症患者采用俯卧位进行自主通气的潜在益处。方法对截至2021年12月20日在MEDLINE、Embase和Scopus数据库中发表的最相关研究进行全面回顾。结果筛选4项观察性研究、1项随机临床试验和3项系统综述进行分析。结论通过统计分析,我们得出俯卧位自动通气虽然可以延迟插管,但不能提高低氧血症合并2型冠状病毒感染的病毒性肺炎患者的生存率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信