Deviation rectification of a high-rise building with piled raft foundation: a case study

IF 0.4 Q4 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Junhua Xiao, Dao-Tong Guo, Qingpeng Wang, X. Gao, Jian-Ping Sun
{"title":"Deviation rectification of a high-rise building with piled raft foundation: a case study","authors":"Junhua Xiao, Dao-Tong Guo, Qingpeng Wang, X. Gao, Jian-Ping Sun","doi":"10.1680/jfoen.21.00036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Deviation rectification of a high-rise building with a piled raft foundation was successfully carried out by vertically digging holes. Through site investigation and finite element analyses of pile foundation settlement, the building tilt was attributed to shortening of the pile length, large post-construction settlement and cancelling the setting of the post-cast strip of concrete between the main building and skirt of an underground garage. A comprehensive rectification scheme was conducted, including drilling settlement-resisting micropiles on the side with a greater subsidence, cutting off the raft between the main building and garage, vertically digging holes and disturbing soil on the side with less subsidence. When the rectified inclination reached the proposed value, the foundation was strengthened by the micopiles for settlement reduction and bearing capacity enhancement. During construction, close monitoring was carried out to dynamically guide the soil extraction operation and monitor building settlement. By analysing the monitoring data over time, the effectiveness of soil extraction for building rectification was verified, and the rectification mechanism of high-rise buildings supported on piled raft foundations was clarified. Finally, the rectification scheme was evaluated and discussed.","PeriodicalId":42902,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Forensic Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Forensic Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1680/jfoen.21.00036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Deviation rectification of a high-rise building with a piled raft foundation was successfully carried out by vertically digging holes. Through site investigation and finite element analyses of pile foundation settlement, the building tilt was attributed to shortening of the pile length, large post-construction settlement and cancelling the setting of the post-cast strip of concrete between the main building and skirt of an underground garage. A comprehensive rectification scheme was conducted, including drilling settlement-resisting micropiles on the side with a greater subsidence, cutting off the raft between the main building and garage, vertically digging holes and disturbing soil on the side with less subsidence. When the rectified inclination reached the proposed value, the foundation was strengthened by the micopiles for settlement reduction and bearing capacity enhancement. During construction, close monitoring was carried out to dynamically guide the soil extraction operation and monitor building settlement. By analysing the monitoring data over time, the effectiveness of soil extraction for building rectification was verified, and the rectification mechanism of high-rise buildings supported on piled raft foundations was clarified. Finally, the rectification scheme was evaluated and discussed.
某高层建筑桩筏基础纠偏实例研究
采用垂直挖孔法对某高层木筏桩基础进行纠偏,取得了成功。通过现场调查和桩基沉降有限元分析,认为桩长缩短、工后沉降大、取消设置主楼与地下车库裙边间的后浇混凝土条是导致建筑物倾斜的主要原因。采用综合整治方案,在沉降较大一侧钻孔抗沉降微桩,切断主楼与车库之间的筏板,在沉降较小一侧垂直挖洞,扰动土。当修正后的倾斜度达到建议值时,采用微桩加固地基,减少沉降,提高承载力。施工过程中密切监测,动态指导抽土作业,监测建筑沉降。通过对长期监测数据的分析,验证了抽土整治建筑的有效性,明确了桩筏基础支撑高层建筑的整治机理。最后对整改方案进行了评价和讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信